Commentary published In: Epistemological issue with keynote article “The role of language processing in language acquisition” by Colin Phillips and Lara Ehrenhofer
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4] 2015
► pp. 454–458
Commentary
Why less is eventually more in second language acquisition
Published online: 31 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.5.4.02dek
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.5.4.02dek
References (21)
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 481–509.
. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59(2), 249–306.
Asher, J.J., & García, R. (1969). The optimal age to learn a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 531, 334–341.
Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language, 631, 544–573.
DeKeyser, R.M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499–533.
. (2012). Age effects in second language learning. In S. Gass, & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 442–460). London: Routledge.
DeKeyser, R.M., Alfi-Shabtay, I., & Ravid, D. (2010). Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(3), 413–438.
Ferman, S., & Karni, A. (2010). No childhood advantage in the acquisition of skill in using an artificial language rule. PLOS One, 5(10), 1–10.
Gathercole, S.E. (1999). Cognitive approaches to the development of short-term memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(11), 410–418.
Gathercole, S.E., Pickering, S.J., Ambridge, B., & Wearing, H. (2004). The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 177–190.
Hyltenstam, K. (1988). Lexical characteristics of near-native second-language learners of Swedish. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 91, 67–84.
Johnson, J.S., & Newport, E.L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 211, 60–99.
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1995). Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), 483–516.
McDonald, J.L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 551, 381–401.
Monner, D., Vatz, K., Morini, G., Hwang, S.-O., & DeKeyser, R. (2013). A neural network model of the effects of entrenchment and memory development on grammatical gender learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 246–265.
Patkowski, M.S. (1980). The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning, 301, 449–472.
Phillips, C., & Ehrenhofer, L. (2015). The role of language processing in language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 51.
Snow, C.E., & Hoefnagel-Höhle, M. (1978). The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development, 491, 1114–1128.
Vatz, K. (2009). Grammatical gender representation and processing in advanced second language learners of French. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.