Cover not available

Commentary published In: Epistemological issue with keynote article “The illusion of language acquisition” by William O’Grady
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3:3] 2013
► pp. 324–329

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Commentary

The emergence of quantifier scope

Published online: 16 September 2013
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.3.3.17yip
Article outline
  • Quantifier scope as the holy grail
  • Transfer in SLA
  • Is language acquisition an illusion?
  • Notes
  • References
References (7)
References
Aoun, J., & Li, A.Y.-H. (1993). The syntax of scope. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in Universal Grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, S. (2009). Interpreting scope ambiguity in first and second language processing: Universal quantifiers and negation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, T., Yip, V., & Wang, C. (1999). Inverse scope in Chinese-English interlanguage. Lingua Posnaniensis 411, 39–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, F-H. (1997). Scope and specificity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolino, J., & Lidz, J. (2006).Why children aren’t universally successful with quantification. Linguistics 441, 817–852. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yip, V., & Matthews, S. (2007). The bilingual child: Early development and language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue