Commentary published In: Epistemological issue with keynote article “The illusion of language acquisition” by William O’Grady
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3:3] 2013
► pp. 350–356
Commentary
Individual differences and streams of processing
Published online: 16 September 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.3.3.14tan
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.3.3.14tan
References (30)
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Clahsen, H., Lück, M., & Hahne, A. (2007). How children process over-regularizations: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Child Language, 341, 601–622.
Van Herten, M., Chwilla, D.J., & Kolk, H.H.J. (2006). When heuristics clash with parsing routines: ERP evidence for conflict monitoring in sentence perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 181, 1181–1197.
Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 991, 122–149.
Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P.J. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 151, 159–201.
Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 521, 205–225.
King, J.W., & Just, M.A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 301, 580–602.
King, J.W., Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 71, 376–395.
Kuperberg, G.R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 11461, 23–49.
Kuperberg, G.R., Kreher, D.A., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., & Holcomb, P.J. (2007). The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 1001, 223–237.
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K.D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 41, 463–470.
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S.A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic anomaly. Science, 2071, 203–205.
. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 3071, 161–163.
McLaughlin, J., Tanner, D., Pitkänen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C., Inoue, K., Valentine, G., & Osterhout, L. (2010). Brain potentials reveal discrete stages of L2 grammatical learning. Language Learning, 60(Suppl. 2), 123–150.
Van de Meerendonk, N., Kolk, H.H.J., Vissers, C.T.W.M., & Chwilla, D.J. (2010). Monitoring in language perception: Mild and strong conflicts elicit different ERP patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 221, 67–82.
Miyake, A., Carpenter, P.A., & Just, M.A. (1994). A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: Making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 111, 671–717.
Molinaro, N., Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions. Cortex, 471, 908–930.
Nakano, H., Saron, C., & Swaab, T.Y. (2010). Speech and span: Working memory capacity impacts the use of animacy but not of world knowledge during spoken sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 221, 2886–2898.
Oines, L., Miyake, A., & Kim, A. (2012). Individual differences in verbal working memory predict reanalysis vs. integration in syntax-semantics conflict scenarios.
Poster presented at the Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference. Riva del Garda, Italy.
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P.J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 311, 785–806.
Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P.J., & Swinney, D.A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence for the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 281, 786–803.
Osterhout, L., McLaughlin, J., Pitkänen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C., & Molinaro, N. (2006). Novice learners, longitudinal designs, and event-related potentials: A means for exploring the neurocognition of second language processing. Language Learning, 56(Suppl. 1), 199–230.
Van Petten, C.K., Weckerly, J., McIsaac, H.K., & Kutas, M. (1997). Working memory capacity dissociates lexical and sentential context effects. Psychological Science, 81, 238–242.
Rugg, M.D., & Coles, M.G.H. (1995). The ERP and cognitive psychology: Conceptual issues. In M.D. Rugg, & M.G.H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (pp. 27–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tanner, D. (2011). Agreement mechanisms in native and nonnative language processing: Electrophysiological correlates of complexity and interference. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
Tanner, D., & Van Hell, J.G. (2012). ERPs reveal individual differences in syntactic processing strategies.
Poster presented at the Psychonomics Society Conference. Minneapolis, MN.
Tanner, D., & Van Hell, J. G. (2013). ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Tanner, D., McLaughlin, J., Herschensohn, J., & Osterhout, L. (in press). Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
Tanner, D., Inoue, K., & Osterhout, L. (in press). Brain-based individual differences in on-line L2 grammatical comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Rastelli, Stefano
Roberts, Leah, Jorge González Alonso, Christos Pliatsikas & Jason Rothman
Mehravari, Alison S., Karen Emmorey, Chantel S. Prat, Lindsay Klarman & Lee Osterhout
Rothman, Jason, José Alemán Bañón & Jorge González Alonso
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
