Cover not available

Article In: Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism: Online-First Articles

Realization of English past tense by Chinese–English heritage bilingual children

Evidence from longitudinal naturalistic data

ORCiD logo with link | Shenzhen University
ORCiD logo with link | The Chinese University of Hong Kong
ORCiD logo with link | The Chinese University of Hong Kong
ORCiD logo with link | The University of Hong Kong
ORCiD logo with link | The Chinese University of Hong Kong | The University of Hong Kong
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Previous research has shown that past-tense inflection is particularly difficult for child learners of English whose L1 is Chinese, with persistent omission often attributed to cross-linguistic influence (CLI). Building on this literature, this study investigates how Chinese–English bilingual children in the United States (US, n = 4) realize English past tense in naturalistic production between 2;8 and 6;11, focusing on CLI from their heritage language. We examined 11,682 utterances and identified 1,052 lexical, copular, and auxiliary verb tokens in obligatory contexts for past-tense marking. All four children displayed optional past-tense inflection in some or all observational periods, along with overregularization and a previously unreported pattern of overmarking. The production patterns suggest that the persistent difficulty of the Chinese-L1 learners in an English-dominant context is a result of the lack of tense marking in Chinese and the overall isolating typology of the language, rather than transfer from specific phonological, morphosyntactic, or lexical elements. Our findings show that heritage bilingual acquisition is a manifestation of language contact at the individual level, and shed new light on how language contact may drive language change at the communal level.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Past tense in English and Chinese
  • 3.Past-tense inflection in monolingual and bilingual children’s English
  • 4.Methods
    • 4.1Research questions and predictions
    • 4.2The data
    • 4.3Data extraction and coding
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Emergence, frequency and telicity
    • 5.2Development
    • 5.3Omission, overregularization and overmarking
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Optional past-tense inflection
    • 6.2Cross-linguistic influence at phonological, morphosyntactic, or lexical levels?
    • 6.3A synchronic window into the mechanisms of language change
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Data availability statement
  • CRediT author statement
  • Acknowledgments
  • Note
  • References
References (55)
References
Aalberse, S., & Hulk, A. (2018). Introduction to the special issue — Heritage language studies and early child bilingualism research: Understanding the connection. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22(5), 491–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aalberse, S., Backus, A., & Muysken, P. (2019). Heritage Languages: A Language Contact Approach. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ambridge, B., Kidd, E., Rowland, C. F., & Theakston, A. L. (2015). The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 42(2), 239–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ansaldo, U. (2009). Contact Languages: Ecology and Evolution in Asia. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ansaldo, U., Bisang, W., & Szeto, P. Y. (2018). Grammaticalization in isolating languages and the notion of complexity. In H. Narrog & B. Heine (Eds.), Grammaticalization From a Typological Perspective (pp. 219–234). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14(2–31), 150–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brebner, C., McCormack, P., & Liow, S. R. (2016). Marking of verb tense in the English of preschool English–Mandarin bilingual children: Evidence from language development profiles within subgroups on the Singapore English Action Picture Test. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 51(1), 31–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A First Language: The Early Stages. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buschfeld, S., & Schneider, G. (2024). Investigating child language acquisition from a joint perspective: A comparison of traditional and new L1 speakers of English. In M. Schmalz, M. Vida-Mannl, S. Buschfeld, & T. Brato (Eds.), Acquisition and Variation in World Englishes: Bridging Paradigms and Rethinking Approaches (pp. 133–158). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, J., & Shirai, Y. (2010). The development of aspectual marking in child Mandarin Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(1), 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1985). Tense. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö., & Velupillai, V. (2013). The past tense. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
Deng, X., & Mai, Z. (2025). Input effects and unidirectional transfer in Mandarin–English heritage bilingual children: The case of spatial prepositional zai-phrases. International Journal of Bilingualism, 29(3), 651–666. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elsness, J. (2009). The present perfect and the preterite. In G. Rohdenburg & J. Schlüter (Eds.), One Language, Two Grammars? Differences Between British and American English (pp. 228–245). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fong, V. (2004). The verbal cluster. In L. Lim (Ed.), Singapore English: A Grammatical Description (pp. 75–104). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K. (2011). The grammaticalization of tense and aspect. In H. Narrog & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, (pp. 580–594). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, H., Qian, L., & Chen, Y. (2024). Language transfer in tense acquisition: New evidence from English learning Chinese adolescents. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 63(31), 2101–2121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, S., & Kan, P. F. (2022). Cross-linguistic transfer between aspect in Cantonese and past tense in English in Cantonese–English bilingual preschool children. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(4), 385–394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hulk, A., & Müller, N. (2000). Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 227–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. A. (1976). -ing, -s, and -ed: A Study of the Acquisition of Certain Verb Inflections [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Minnesota.
Kupisch, T., & Polinsky, M. (2022). Language history on fast forward: Innovations in heritage languages and diachronic change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(1), 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakshmanan, U. (1991). Morphological uniformity and null subjects in child second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (Ed.), Point Counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the Second Language (pp. 389–410). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. (1998). Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady-state. Second Language Research, 14(1), 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, C., & Thompson, S. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mai, Z., & Yip, V. (2022). Caretaker input and trilingual development of Mandarin, Cantonese and English in early childhood (1;6–2;11). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(9), 3389–3403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mai, Z., Shang, M., Liu, J., Yan, S., Matthews, S., & Yip, V. (2024, July 15–19) Acquiring Chinese in US, Hong Kong and Beijing: Three new corpora and three verbal structures [Paper presentation]. XVIth International Congress for the Study of Child Language (IASCL-2024), Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, J. T., & Xu, F. (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57(4), 1–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2016). The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montrul, S., & Sánchez-Walker, N. (2013). Differential object marking in child and adult Spanish heritage speakers. Language Acquisition, 20(2), 109–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muysken, P. (2013). Language contact outcomes as the result of bilingual optimization strategies. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(4), 709–730. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicoladis, E., Song, J., & Marentette, P. (2012). Do young bilinguals acquire past tense morphology like monolinguals, only later? Evidence from French–English and Chinese–English bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(3), 457–479. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicoladis, E., Yang, Y. & Jiang, Z. (2020). Why jumped is so difficult: Tense/aspect marking in Mandarin–English bilingual children. Journal of Child Language, 47(5), 1073–1083. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2023). Sources of individual differences in the dual language development of heritage bilinguals. Journal of Child Language, 50(4), 793–817. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, J., & Genesee, F. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or interdependent? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, J., Tulpar, Y., & Arppe, A. (2016). Chinese L1 children’s English L2 verb morphology over time: Individual variation in long-term outcomes. Journal of Child Language, 43(3), 553–580. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253(5019), 530–535. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Place, S., & Hoff, E. (2011). Properties of dual language exposure that influence 2-year-olds’ bilingual proficiency. Child Development, 82(6), 1834–1849. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2011). Reanalysis in adult heritage language: A case for attrition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 305–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radford, A. (1988). Small children’s small clauses. Transactions of the Philological Society, 86(1), 1–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). What can syntactic priming tell us about crosslinguistic influence? In K. Messenger (Ed.), Syntactic Priming in Language Acquisition: Representations, Mechanisms and Applications (pp. 129–156). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sybesma, R. P. (2007). Whether we tense–agree overtly or not. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(3), 580–587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szeto, P. Y., & Yurayong, C. (2021). Sinitic as a typological sandwich: Revisiting the notions of Altaicization and Taicization. Linguistic Typology, 25(3), 551–599. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szeto, P. Y., Matthews, S., & Yip, V. (2017). Multiple correspondence and typological convergence in contact-induced grammaticalization: Evidence from Cantonese–English bilingual development. Journal of Language Contact, 10(3), 485–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Bilingual children as “laboratories” for studying contact outcomes: Development of perfective aspect. Linguistics, 57(3), 693–723. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2013). Current issues in multilingual first language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 21–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, C., Van Wonderen, E., Koutamanis, E., Kootstra, G. J., Dijkstra, T., & Unsworth, S. (2022). Cross-linguistic influence in simultaneous and early sequential bilingual children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Child Language, 49(5), 897–929. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yip, V., & Matthews, S. (2007). The Bilingual Child: Early Development and Language Contact. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue