Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 15:3 (2025) ► pp.404–423

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

More evidence on the unergative–unaccusative distinction in second language grammars

ORCiD logo with link | Utsunomiya University
ORCiD logo with link | University of Fukui
Published online: 8 April 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.24058.kim
Abstract
This study presents new evidence for the structural unergative–unaccusative distinction, in second language (L2) grammars, focusing on elementary-level Japanese-speaking learners of English (JLEs). The underlying distinction of unergatives–unaccusatives is often obscured on the surface strings due to independent syntactic properties such as feature-driven subject movement (in English) or headedness (in Japanese). Nevertheless, based on previous findings, elementary-level JLEs are expected to have reset headedness but have not acquired subject movement. Then, the resulting representation would not involve the properties obscuring the underlying unergative–unaccusative distinction and potentially exhibit it on the surface strings in L2 English. Following these observations, we carefully designed test sentences with un/grammatical word orders that elementary-level JLEs would generate and conducted an acceptability judgment task with native speakers of English and elementary-/intermediate-level JLEs. The results showed that, in contrast to native controls and intermediate learners, who exhibited target-like patterns, elementary-level JLEs incorrectly accepted ungrammatical word orders only with unaccusatives (e.g., *When did arrive the train?) but not those with unergatives (e.g., *Where did dance the man?). This discrepancy can be attributed to the sensitivity to the structural distinction of unergative–unaccusative verbs, and our data provide evidence for the creative construction of an interlanguage in L2 acquisition.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Unergative–unaccusative distinctions in L2 English
  • 3.Syntax of subjects and unaccusativity in Japanese
  • 4.Japanese–English interlanguage as potential evidence for underlying structures
  • 5.Present Study
    • 5.1Research Question and Predictions
    • 5.2Methodology
      • 5.2.1Participants
      • 5.2.2Task and materials
  • 6.Results
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Competing Interests Declaration
  • Data availability statement
  • Notes
  • References
References (61)
References
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Schäfer, F. (2015). External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, M., Johnson, K., & Roberts, I. (1989). Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(2), 219–251.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balcom, P. (1997). Why is this happened? Passive morphology and unaccusativity. Second Language Research, 13(1), 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R., Singmann, H., Dai, B., Scheipl, F., Grothendieck, G., & Green, P. (2020). Package ‘lme4’ (Version 1.1–26).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (1994). Locative inversion and the architecture of Universal Grammar. Language, 70(1), 72–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carrier, J., & Randall, J. H. (1992). The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 23(2), 173–234.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Minimalism: Where are we now, and where can we hope to go. Gengo Kenkyu, 1601, 1–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., Gallego, Á., & Ott, D. (2019). Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 2019. 229–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, C. (2005). A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax, 8(2), 81–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Epstein, S. D., Kitahara, H., & Seely, T. D. (2016). Phase cancellation by external pairmerge of heads. The Linguistic Review, 331, 87–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fukui, N. (1995). Theory of projection in syntax. CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Hattori, H. (2006). Interpretation of English multiple wh-question by Japanese speakers: a missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research, 22(3), 269–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Liszka, S. (2003). Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken, & R. Towell (Eds.), The interface between syntax and lexicon in second language acquisition (pp. 21–44). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haznedar, B. (1997). Child second language acquisition of English: A longitudinal case study of a Turkish-speaking child [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Durham.
Hirakawa, M. (2001). L2 acquisition of Japanese unaccusative verbs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(2), 221–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Unaccusativity in second language Japanese and English. Hituzi Syobo Publishing LTD.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). ‘Passive’ unaccusative errors in L2 English revisited. In R. Slabakova, S. A. Montrul, & P. Prevost (Eds.) Inquiries in linguistic development (pp.17–39). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoekstra, T. (1988). Small clause results. Lingua, 74(2–3), 101–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ionin, T. (2012). Formal theory-based methodologies. In A. Mackey, & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 30–52). Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaeggli, O. (1986). Passive. Linguistic Inquiry, 17(4), 587–622.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ju, M. K. (2000). Overpassivization errors by second language learners: The effect of conceptualizable agents in discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(1), 85–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kageyama, T. (1993). Bunpoo to gokeisei [Grammar and word formation]. Hitsuji Shobo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Dooshi imi-ron [Semantics of verbs]. Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kimura, T. (2022a). Feature selection, feature reassembly, and the role of Universal Grammar: The acquisition of wh-questions by Japanese and Chinese learners of English. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Chuo University.
(2022b). ‘Control’-ed raising: Misanalyses of infinitival clause structures by L2 learners. Journal of the Institute of Cultural Science, 1031, 37–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(to appear). ‘Strong’ weak-island effects in Interlanguage: Arguments from D-linking. Proceedings of BUCLD 491.
Kimura, T., & Wakabayashi, S. (2024). UG–as–guide in selection and reassembly of an uninterpretable feature in L2 acquisition of wh-questions: Evidence from islands and scope. In M. Velnić, A. Dahl, & K. Listhaug (Eds.), Current perspectives on generative SLA — Representations, Processing and Development (pp. 318–350). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kishimoto, H. (1996). Split intransitivity in Japanese and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Language, 72(2), 248–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1997). The Basic Variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13(4), 301–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. (1996). Serving the external argument from its verb. In J. Rooryck, & L. Zarling (Eds.) Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp. 109–137). Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuribara, C. (2004). Misanalysis of subjects in Japanese–English interlanguage. Second Language, 31, 69–95.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. A., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on a contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2), 173–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leal, T., & Shimanskaya, E. (2024). The power of paradox in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 14(1), 85–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport-Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax–lexical semantics interface. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lohndal, T., & Putnam, M. (2024). The importance of features and exponents. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 14(1), 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meisel, J. (1991). Principles of Universal Grammar and strategies of language learning: some similarities and differences between first and second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (Ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 231–276). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: contrasting first and second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 13(3), 227–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miyamoto, Y., & Iijima, Y. (2003). On the existence of scrambling in the grammar of Japanese elementary EFL learners. In S. Foster-Cohen, & S. P. Doehler (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook, 3(1), 7–27. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myles, F. (2004). From data to theory: the over-representation of linguistic knowledge in SLA. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102(2). 139–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakayama, M., & Yoshimura, N. (2019, July 5). On the intervention effects and subjects in the interpretation of raising constructions by Japanese learners of English [Conference presentation]. Tohoku University, Sendai.
Oshita, H. (2000). What is happened may not be what appears to be happening: A corpus study of ‘passive’ unaccusatives in L2 English. Second Language Research, 16(4), 293–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, K.-S., & Lakshmanan, U. (2007). The unaccusative–unergative distinction in resultatives: Evidence from Korean L2 learners of English. In A. Belikova, L. Meroni, & Umeda, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of GALANA 21 (pp. 328–338). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. (1978). Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 157–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Progovac, L. (2015). The absolutive basis of middles and the status of vP and UTAH. FASL, 231, 242–261.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B. (2001). An event structure account of English resultatives. Language, 771, 766–797. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, M. (2003). A derivational approach to the interpretation of scrambling chains. Lingua, 1131, 481–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sprouse, J. (2011). A validation of Amazon Mechanical Turk for the collection of acceptability judgments in linguistic theory. Behavior Research Methods, 43(1), 155–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M., & Dimitrakopoulou, M. (2007). The Interpretability Hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 23(2), 215–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate. (2001). Quick Placement Test. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wakabayashi, S., & Negishi, R. (2003). Asymmetry of subjects and objects in Japanese speakers’ L2 English. Second Language, 21, 53–73.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wechsler, S. (1997). Resultative predicates and control. In R. C. Blight, & M. J. Moosally (Eds.), Proceedings of the Texas Linguistic Forum 381 (pp. 307–321), Department of Linguistics, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yatsushiro, K. (1999). Case licensing and VP structure. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Connecticut.
Yusa, N. (2003). ‘Passive’ unaccusatives in L2 acquisition. In P. Clancy (Ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 111 (pp. 246–259). CLSI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zobl, H. (1989). Canonical typological structures and ergativity in English L2 acquisition. In S. Gass, & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 203–221). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kimura, Takayuki
2025. Revisiting Universal Grammar in L2 acquisition: Weak conformity and linguistic dissonance resolution. Second Language Research DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue