Cover not available

Commentary published In: Epistemological issue: The importance of features and exponents: Dissolving Feature Reassembly
Edited by Cristina Flores and Neal Snape
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:1] 2024
► pp. 53–57

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
Commentary

Where are features?

ORCiD logo with link | University of Zurich
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with University of Zurich.

Published online: 1 February 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.23064.gar
References (25)
References
Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asudeh, A., & Siddiqi, D. (forthc.). Morphology in LFG. In M. Dalrymple (Ed.), The Handbook of Lexical Functional Grammar. Language Science Press.
Bauer, L. (2004). The function of word-formation and the inflection-derivation distinction. In H. Aertsen, M. Hannay, & R. Lyall (Eds.), Words in their places: A festschrift for J. Lachlan Mackenzie (pp. 283–292). Vrije Universiteit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beard, R. (1995). Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: A general theory of inflection and word formation. SUNY series in linguistics. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonami, O., & Stump, G. (2016). Paradigm Function Morphology. In A. Hippisley & G. Stump (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology (pp. 449–481). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G. E. (1993). Against split morphology. In G. E. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1993 (pp. 27–50). Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In G. E. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995 (pp. 1–16). Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, G. G. (2012). Features. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dokulil, M. (1962). Tvoření slov v c̆eštině, vol. 1: Teorie odvozování slov. Nakladatelství Československé Akademie Věd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardani, F. (2008). Borrowing of inflectional morphemes in language contact. Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Plural across inflection and derivation, fusion and agglutination. In L. Johanson & M. I. Robbeets (Eds.), Copies versus cognates in bound morphology (pp. 71–97). Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). On morphological borrowing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 12(10), e12302 [1–17]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Borrowing matter and pattern in morphology. An overview. Morphology, 30(4), 263–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). On how morphology spreads. Word Structure, 14(2), 129–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Contact and borrowing. In A. Ledgeway & M. Maiden (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Romance linguistics (pp. 845–869). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R., & Audring, J. (2020). The texture of the lexicon: Relational morphology and the parallel architecture. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. M. (1995). The formal architecture of Lexical-Functional Grammar. In M. Dalrymple, R. M. Kaplan, J. T. Maxwell III, & A. Zaenen (Eds.), Formal issues in lexical-functional grammar (pp. 7–27). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, J. (1936). Dérivation lexicale et dérivation syntaxique: Contribution à la théorie des parties du discours. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris, 371, 79–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2008). Feature-assembly in second language acquisition. In J. M. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 106–140). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lohndal, T. & Putnam, M. (2024). The importance of features and exponents: Dissolving Feature Reassembly. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 14(1).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sadock, J. M. (1991). Autolexical syntax: A theory of parallel grammatical representations. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). The modular architecture of grammar. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sproat, R. (1996). Review of Robert Beard. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme base morphology. Journal of Linguistics, 32(2), 497–504. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stump, G. T. (2001). Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue