Cover not available

Article published In: Structural similarity across domains in third language acquisition
Edited by Nadine Kolb, Natalia Mitrofanova and Marit Westergaard
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 13:5] 2023
► pp. 693–716

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Verb placement in L3 French and L3 German

The role of language-internal factors in determining cross-linguistic influence from prior languages

ORCiD logo with link | University of Oslo
ORCiD logo with link | NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
ORCiD logo with link | University of Toronto
ORCiD logo with link | NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Published online: 17 October 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.22058.bus
Abstract
This article explores cross-linguistic influence and the relationship between surface structure and underlying syntactic structure in L3 acquisition of verb placement in L1 Norwegian L2 English learners of L3 German or French, respectively. In these languages, verb placement varies systematically. Previous research has found transfer from both L1 and L2 in similar language combinations. Using an acceptability judgment task, we tested verb placement in non-subject-initial and subject-initial sentences. Findings indicate that L3 French learners performed better on non-subject-initial sentences compared to subject-initial sentences, whereas the opposite was the case in L3 German.
We argue that our findings can be explained by a generative account of verb movement and are compatible with an analysis where verbs do not move, or do not move far enough, in the L3 learners’ underlying syntactic representation. Following the assumption that verb movement is a costly operation, we argue that the syntactic operation verb movement is constrained by principles of economy in L3 acquisition, and that economy plays a role in determining cross-linguistic influence in multilingual acquisition. Our account is compatible with a uniform analysis of the acquisition of verb movement in L1, L2 and L3, and underlines the qualitative similarities in different acquisition processes.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Verb placement in English, French, German and Norwegian
    • 1.2Acquisition of verb placement in L1, L2, and L3
  • 2.The present study
    • 2.1Methods
      • 2.1.1Participants
      • 2.1.2Materials and procedure
      • 2.1.3Analysis
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1L2 English
    • 3.2L3 French and German
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Surface word order, underlying syntactic structure, and economy of movement
    • 4.2Limitations
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Data availability
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (54)
References
Anderssen, M., Bentzen, K., Busterud, G., Dahl, A., Lundquist, B., & Westergaard, M. (2018). The acquisition of word order in L2 Norwegian: The case of subject and object shift. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 41(3), 247–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ayoun, D. (1999). Verb movement in French L2 acquisition. Bilingualism, 2(2), 103–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459–484. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). The L2 status factor and the declarative/procedural distinction. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, S. Flynn, & J. Rothman (Eds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 61–78). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bohnacker, U. (2006). When Swedes begin to learn German: From V2 to V2. Second Language Research, 22(4), 443–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosch, J. E., & Unsworth, S. (2021). Cross-linguistic influence in word order: Effects of age, dominance and surface overlap. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(6), 783–816. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christensen, R. H. B. (2022). Ordinal – Regression models for ordinal data. R package version 2022.11-16 [URL]
Clahsen, H., & Muysken, P. (1986). The availability of Universal Grammar to adult and child learners – a study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research, 2(2), 119 – 193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion Volume. Council of Europe Publishing. [URL]
Dahl, A., Listhaug, K. F., & Busterud, G. (2022). The role of L1 Norwegian and L2 English in the acquisition of verb placement in L3 German. In E. Shimanskaya, T. L. Leal, & C. Isabelli (Eds.), Generative SLA in the age of Minimalism: Features, interfaces, and beyond (Selected proceedings of the 15th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haider, H. (2012). The Syntax of German. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., Towell, R., & Bazergui, N. (1993). Universal Grammar and the Acquisition of French Verb Movement by Native Speakers of English. Second Language Research, 9(3), 189–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmberg, A., & Platzack, C. (1995). The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Håkansson, G., Pienemann, M., & Sayehli, S. (2002). Transfer and typological proximity in the context of second language processing. Second Language Research, 18(3), 250–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johansen, H. (2008). Inversjon i norsk innlærerspråk: En undersøkelse av variasjonsmønstre i skrevne tekster. NOA norsk som andrespråk, 24(2), 50–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jordens, P. (1990). The acquisition of verb placement in Dutch and German. Linguistics, 28(6), 1407–1448. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1 – 26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Language Council. (2017). Språkstatus 2017 – Språkpolitisk tilstandsrapport frå Språkrådet [Language policy report from the Norwegian Language Council]. [URL]
. (2021). Språkstatus 2021 – Media and culture [Report on language in media and culture from the Norwegian Language Council]. [URL]
Lenth, R. V. (2023). Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.8.4–1 [URL]
Listhaug, K. F., Busterud, G., & Dahl, A. (2021). French as a third language in Norway: The influence of the prior languages in the acquisition of word order. Oslo Studies in Language (OSLa), 12(1), 125–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Håkansson, G. (2007). Response article Full transfer vs. developmentally moderated transfer: a reply to Bohnacker. Second Language Research, 23(4), 485–493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., Marsden, E., Crowther, D., Gass, S. M., & Spinner, P. (2020). A methodological synthesis of judgment tasks in second language research. Second Language Research, 36(4), 583–621. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poeppel, D., & Wexler, K. (1993). The Full Competence Hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language, 69(1), 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(3), 365–424. [URL]
Puig-Mayenco, E., González Alonso, J., & Rothman, J. (2020). A systematic review of transfer studies in third language acquisition. Second Language Research, 36(1), 31–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rankin, T. (2011). The transfer of V2: inversion and negation in German and Dutch learners of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(1), 139–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1996). Residual Verb Second and the Wh-Criterion. In A. Belleti & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads : Essays in Comparative Syntax. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, I. (2001). Head movement. In M. R. Baltin & C. Collins (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (pp. 112–147). Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roeper, T. (1999). Universal bilingualism. Bilingualism, 2(3), 169–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, J. (2015). Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism, 18(2), 179–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2017). The scalpel model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 651–665. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snyder, W. (2007). Child language: the parametric approach. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stadt, R., Hulk, A., & Sleeman, P. (2016). The influence of L2 English and immersion education on L3 French in the Netherlands. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 33(1), 152 – 165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). The influence of L1 Dutch and L2 English on L3 French: A longitudinal study. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 2(1), 63–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020a). L1 Dutch vs L2 English and the initial stages of L3 French acquisition. In C. Bardel & L. Sánchez (Eds.), Third language acquisition: Age, proficiency and multilingualism. (pp. 237–261). Language Science Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020b). L2 Influence in L3 Acquisition: The Role of the L3. In A. Trotzke & T. Kupisch (Eds.), Formal Linguistics and Language Education: New Empirical Perspectives (pp. 203–221). Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trahey, M., & White, L. (1993). Positive Evidence and Preemption in the Second Language Classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 181–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Travis, L. (1991). Parameters of phrase structure and verb-second phenomena. In R. Freidin (Ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar (pp. 339–364). MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waldmann, C. (2012). Moving in small steps towards verb secons: A case study. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 34(3), 331–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009b). Usage-based vs. rule-based learning: the acquisition of word order in wh-questions in English and Norwegian. Journal of Child Language, 36(5), 1023–1051. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition. Second Language Research, 37(3), 379–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westergaard, M., Lohndal, T., & Alexiadou, A. (2019). The asymmetric nature of V2: Evidence from learner languages. In K. R. Christensen, H. Jørgensen, & J. L. Wood (Eds.), The Sign of the V – Papers in Honour of Sten Vikner (pp. 709–733). Dept. of English, School of Communication & Culture, Aarhus University. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westergaard, M., Lohndal, T., & Lundquist, B. (2023). Variable V2 in Norwegian heritage language: An effect of crosslinguistic influence? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 13(2), 133–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y. (2017). Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 666–682. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Rodina, Y., & Slabakova, R. (2023). Full Transfer Potential in L3/Ln acquisition: Crosslinguistic influence as a property-by-property process. In J. Cabrelli, A. Chaouch-Orozco, J. González Alonso, S. M. P. S. Soares, E. Puig-Mayenco, & J. Rothman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of third language acquisition and processing. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, L. (1990/91). The Verb-Movement Parameter in Second Language Acquisition. Language Acquisition, 1(4), 337–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, C. D. (2002). Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwart, C. J.-W. (1997). Morphosyntax of Verb Movement. A Minimalist Approach to the Syntax of Dutch. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Rankin, Tom & Thomas Wagner
2025. Effects of input frequency and microvariation on knowledge of negative inversion in L2 English. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 15:5 ► pp. 718 ff. DOI logo
Kolb, Nadine, Natalia Mitrofanova & Marit Westergaard
2023. Structural similarity in third language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 13:5 ► pp. 607 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue