Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 14:2 (2024) ► pp.147–177

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

L2 tolerance of pragmatic violations of informativeness

Evidence from ad hoc implicatures and contrastive inference

ORCiD logo with link | Peking University
Published online: 9 June 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.21064.fen
Abstract
This study sets out to investigate second language (L2) speakers’ derivation of pragmatic inferences and tolerance of violations of informativeness in two types of inferences, i.e., ad hoc implicatures and contrastive inference. The results of a graded judgment task revealed that pragmatic tolerance is inference-specific: L2 speakers were overly tolerant of underinformative statements in ad hoc implicatures than in contrastive inference. In addition, L2 speakers were found to be more relaxed with overinformativeness than underinformativeness in contrastive inference. The fact that L2 speakers tend to be redundant (overinformative) than ambiguous (underinformative) is further discussed with the Pragmatic Principles Violation Hypothesis ( (2016). Pragmatic principles in anaphora resolution at the syntax-discourse interface: Advanced English learners of Spanish in the CEDEL2 corpus. In M. Alonso-Ramos (Ed.), Studies in corpus linguistics (Vol. 781, pp. 235–265). John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar). This study hopes to contribute to a more find-grained understanding of L2 speakers’ abilities of deriving pragmatic inferences.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Native speakers’ processing of ad hoc implicatures and contrastive inference
  • 3.L2 acquisition of implicatures and referential expressions
  • 4.The present study
    • 4.1Research questions
    • 4.2Test design and materials
    • 4.3Participants and procedures
    • 4.4Data analysis
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (78)
References
Alonso-Ovalle, L., Fernandez-Solera, S., Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (2002). Null vs. overt pronouns and the topic-focus articulation in Spanish. Journal of Italian Linguistics, 14(2), 151–169.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antoniou, K., & Katsos, N. (2017). The effect of childhood multilingualism and bilectalism on implicature understand. Applied Psycholinguistics, 381, 787–833. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antoniou, K., Veenstra, A., Kissine, M., & Katsos, N. (2019). How does childhood bilingualism and bi-dialectalism affect the interpretation and processing of pragmatic meanings? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 186–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arts, A. (2004). Overspecification in instructive texts. Doctoral dissertation, Tillburg University.
Barner, D., Brooks, N., & Bale, A. (2011). Accessing the unsaid: the role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference. Cognition, 118(1), 84–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism Development Disorder, 311, 5–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barr, D., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 681, 255–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bel, A., & Garcia-Alcaraz, E. (2015). Subject pronouns in the L2 Spanish of Moroccan Arabic speakers. In T. Judy and S. Perpinan (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish in understudied language pairings (pp. 201–232). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bel, A., Sagarra, N., Cominguez, J. P., & Garcia-Alcaraz, E. (2016). Transfer and proficiency effects in L2 processing of subject anaphora. Lingua, 1841, 134–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belke, E. (2006). Visual determinants of preferred adjective order. Visual Cognition, 141, 261–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bott, L., Bailey, T. M., & Grodner, D. (2012). Distinguishing speed from accuracy in scalar implicatures. Journal of Memory and Language, 661, 123–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bott, L. & Noveck, I. A. (2004). Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course o scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 511, 437–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breheny, R., Ferguson, H. J., & Katsos, N. (2013). Investigating the timecourse of accessing conversational implicatures during incremental sentence interpretation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(4), 443–467. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breheny, R., Katsos, N., & Williams, J. N. (2006). Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. Cognition, 100(3), 434–463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, R. (1998). Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance theory: Applications and implications (pp. 179–236). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. (2006). Broaden your views: Implicatures of domain widening and the “logicality” of language. Linguistic Inquiry, 371, 535–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, G., Fox, D., & Spector, B. (2012). Scalar implicature as a grammatical phenomenon. In P. Portner, C. Maienborn, & K. von Heusinger (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning (pp. 2297–2331). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christensen, R. H. B. (2019). Ordinal: Regression Models for Ordinal Data. R package version 2019, 12–10.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Contemori, C., & Dussias, P. E. (2016). Referential choice in a second language: Evidence for a listener-oriented approach. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(10), 1257–1272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crosthwaite, P. (2014). Definite discourse-new reference in L1 and L2: A study of bridging in Mandarin, Korean, and English. Language Learning, 64(3), 456–492. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cunnings, I., Fotiadou, G., & Tsimpli, I. M. (2017). Anaphora resolution and reanalysis during L2 sentence processing: Evidence from the visual world paradigm. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 391, 621–652. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, C., & Katsos, N. (2010). Over-informative children: Production/comprehension asymmetry or tolerance to pragmatic violations? Lingua, 1201, 1956–1972. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degen, J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2011). Making inference: The case of scalar implicature processing. In L. A. Carlson, C. Holscher & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 3299–3304.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Processing scalar implicature: A constraint-based approach. Cognitive science, 39(4), 667–710. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donaldson, B. (2012). Syntax and discourse in near-native French: clefts and focus. Language Learning 621, 902–930. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekiert, M. (2010). Linguistic effects on thinking for writing: The case of articles in L2 English. In Z. Han & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking (pp. 125–153). Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engelhardt, P. E., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferreira, F. (2006). Do speakers and listeners observe the Gricean maxim of quantity? Journal of Memory and Language, 541, 554–573. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engelhardt, P. E., Demiral, S. B., & Ferreira, F. (2011). Over-specified referring expressions impair comprehension: An ERP study. Brain and Cognition, 771, 304–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feeney, A., Scrafton, S., Duckworth, A., & Handley, S. J. (2004). The story of some: Everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 121–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feng, S. (under review). L2 speakers’ tolerance of pragmatic violations in interpreting scalar implicatures.
Foppolo, F., Mazzaggio, G., Panzeri, F., & Surian, L. (2020). Scalar and ad hoc pragmatic inferences in children: guess which one is easier. Journal of Child Language, 48(2), 350–372. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In: Davidson, D. and Harman, G. (Eds.), The logic of grammar (pp. 64–75). Encino, CA: Dickenson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guasti, M. T., Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Foppolo, F., Gualmini, A., & Meroni, L. (2005). Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 201, 667–696. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, L. (1972). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Bloomington, USA.
Horowitz, A. C., Schneider, R. M., & Frank, M. C. (2018). The trouble with quantifiers: Exploring children’s deficits in scalar implicature. Children Development, 89(6), e572–e593. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C. -T James. (1987). Existential sentences in Chinese and (in)definiteness. In E. Reuland (Ed.), Between syntax and semantics (pp. 63–85). Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J. (2009). Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantics–pragmatics interface. Cognitive Psychology, 581, 376–415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jegerski, J., Van Patten, B., & Keating, G. D. (2011). Cross-linguistic variation and the acquisition of pronominal reference in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research, 27(4), 481–507. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Judy, T. (2015). Knowledge and processing of subject-related discourse properties in L2 near-native speakers of Spanish, L1 Farsi. In T. Judy & S. Perpinan (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish in understudied language pairings (pp. 169–199). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katsos, N., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2011). Pragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature. Cognition, 120(1), 67–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kronmuller, E., Morisseau, T., & Noveck, I. (2014). Show me the pragmatic contribution: A developmental investigation of contrastive inference. Journal of Child Language, 411, 985–1014. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (2000). Presumptive Meanings. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, T. M., & Kruschke, J. K. (2018). Analyzing ordinal data with metric models: What could possibly go wrong? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 791, 328–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lozano, C. (2009). Selective deficits at the syntax-discourse interface: Evidence from the CEDEL2 corpus. In Y.-I. Leung, N. Snape & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), Representational deficits in second language acquisition (pp. 127–166). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Pragmatic principles in anaphora resolution at the syntax-discourse interface: Advanced English learners of Spanish in the CEDEL2 corpus. In M. Alonso-Ramos (Ed.), Studies in corpus linguistics (Vol. 781, pp. 235–265). John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). The development of anaphora resolution at the syntax-discourse interface: Pronominal subjects in Greek learners of Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47(2), 411–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maes, A., Arts, A., & Noordman, L. (2004). Reference management in instructive discourse. Discourse Processes, 371, 117–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, D., Giancaspro, D., Iverson, M., Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R. (2016). Not just algunos, but indeed unos L2ers can acquire scalar implicatures in L2 Spanish. Language Acquisition Beyond Parameters, 511, 125–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitkovska, L., & Bužarovska, E. (2018). Subject pronoun (non)realization in the English learner language of Macedonian speakers. Second Language Research, 341, 463–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
National College English Syllabus for Non-English Majors. (1999). Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nieuwland, M. S., Ditman, T., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2010). On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities. Journal of Memory and Language, 631, 324–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noveck, I. A. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicatures. Cognition, 781, 165–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noveck, I. A., & Posada, A. (2003). Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language, 85(2), 203–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papafragou, A., & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface. Cognition, 861, 253–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, W., Lu, Y., & Lee, T. H. (2019). Existential and locative constructions in mandarin Chinese. Linguistic Review, 37(2), 231–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pechman, T. (1989). Incremental speech production and referential overspecification. Linguistics, 271, 89–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quesada, T., & Lozano, C. (2020). Which factors determine the choice of referential expressions in L2 English discourse? New evidence from the COREFL corpus. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(5), 959–986. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, J. (2009). Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences?: L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax-pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics, 411, 951–973. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryan, J. (2015). Overexplicit referent tracking in L2 English: Strategy, avoidance, or myth? Language Learning, 65(4), 824–859. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sedivy, J. C. (2007). Implicature during real time conversation: A view from language processing research. Philosophy Compass, 21, 475–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sedivy, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., Chambers, C. G., & Carlson, G. N. (1999). Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition, 701, 19–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skordos, D., & Papafragou, A. (2016). Children’s derivation of scalar implicatures: Alternatives and relevance. Cognition, 1531, 6–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2010). Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition. Lingua, 1201, 2444–2462. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sonnenschein, S. (1982). The effects of redundant communications on listeners: When more is less. Child Development, 53(3), 717–729. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986/1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.) Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stiller, A., Goodman, N. D., & Frank, M. C. (2015). Ad-hoc implicature in preschool children. Language Learning and Development, 111, 176–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Su, Y. E. (2013). Scalar implicatures and downward entailment in child mandarin. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 22(2), 167–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tieu, L., Romoli, J., Zhou, P., & Crain, S. (2016). Children’s knowledge of free choice inferences and scalar implicatures. Journal of Semantics, 33(2), 269–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, E., & Katsos, N. (2021). Pragmatic, linguistic and cognitive factors in young children’s development of quantity, relevance and word learning inferences. Journal of Child Language, 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, X., Minai, U., & Fiorentino, R. (2018). Context-sensitivity and individual differences in the derivation of scalar implicature. Frontiers in Psychology, 91, Article 1720. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoon, E. J., & Frank, M. C. (2019). The role of salience in young children’s processing of ad hoc implicatures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1861, 99–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yuan, B. (1995). Acquisition of base-generated topics by English-speaking learners of Chinese. Language Learning, 45(4), 567–603. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Destruel, Emilie & Glenn Starr
2025. Scalar diversity in L2 French speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 15:6 ► pp. 843 ff. DOI logo
Martín-Villena, Fernando, Cristóbal Lozano & Antonella Sorace
2025. L1 morphosyntactic attrition in instructed and immersed bilinguals: modulators of redundancy in oral production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Quesada, Teresa & Cristóbal Lozano
2025. Bidirectionality in bilingualism? Asymmetry in L1 Spanish-L2 English vs. L1 English-L2 Spanish bilinguals. Lingua 317 ► pp. 103898 ff. DOI logo
Khaled Yasseen, Maha & Kamal Hazim Hussein Ali
2024. EFL Learners' Pragmatic Tolerance of Quantity Maxim Violation. Al-Noor Journal for Humanities 2:3 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Lozano, Cristóbal & Teresa Quesada
2023. What corpus data reveal about the Position of Antecedent Strategy: anaphora resolution in Spanish monolinguals and L1 English-L2 Spanish bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue