Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 14:2 (2024) ► pp.115–146

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Naïve English-speaking learners’ use of indirect positive evidence

The case of Mandarin plural marking

ORCiD logo with link | Qinghai University
ORCiD logo with link | McGill University
Published online: 29 July 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.21024.li
Abstract
When second language learners are faced with acquiring a grammar that is a subset of their native language grammar, direct positive evidence is unavailable. We question whether learners can instead use indirect positive evidence: evidence drawn from errors in the learner’s L1 made by native speakers of the learner’s L2. We examine if naïve English-speaking learners of Mandarin can determine from plural omission errors in Mandarin speakers’ English productions that Mandarin marks plural in a subset of conditions under which English does. Participants were exposed to indirect positive evidence via an English-medium dialogue where a native Mandarin-speaking interlocutor produced all contextually plural nouns as singulars. Subsequently, participants learnt 12 Mandarin-like nouns in singular contexts, after which their word learning was tested using both singular and plural pictures as prompts. Forty percent of participants correctly deduced that strings to which they had assigned singular interpretations were also appropriate in plural contexts. Follow-up questions revealed that they noticed the errors in the dialogue and used these to inform their understanding of plural marking in Mandarin. This result suggests that indirect positive evidence may be an effective tool for real language learners to acquire a grammar that is a subset of their native grammar.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Types of evidence for learning a subset grammar
  • 3.Mandarin plural marking
    • 3.1The learning challenge
    • 3.2Indirect positive evidence?
  • 4.Research questions
  • 5.Methods
    • 5.1Participants
    • 5.2Materials
    • 5.3Procedure
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Results by group
    • 6.2Results by individual
  • 7.Discussion
    • 7.1Research questions revisited
    • 7.2Individual variation
    • 7.3Probing participants’ high rate of success
    • 7.4Indirect positive evidence and real language learning
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (39)
References
Alcina Franch, J., & Blecua, J. M. (1975). Gramática española. Ariel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, G. (2014). Asymmetries in L2 functional morphology: The Korean speaker of English. PhD dissertation, University of New England, Australia.
Brooks, P. J., & Kempe, V. (2013). Individual differences in adult foreign language learning: The mediating effect of metalinguistic awareness. Memory & Cognition, 41(2), 281–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, J., Campos-Dintrans, G., & Rothman, J. (2018). The role of L1 phonology in L2 morphological production: L2 English past tense production by L1 Spanish, Mandarin, and Japanese speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 401, 503–527. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, L. L.-S., & Sybesma, R. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry, 301, 509–542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 61, 339–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cole, R. A., & Jakimik, J. (1979). How are syllables used to recognize words? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67(3), 965–970. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goad, H. & White, L. (2019). Prosodic effects on L2 grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 91, 769–808. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goad, H., White, L., & Steele, J. (2003). Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations? Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 481, 243–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hwang, S. H., & Lardiere, D. (2013). Plural-marking in L2 Korean: A feature-based approach. Second Language Research, 29(1), 57–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iljic, R. (1994). Quantification in Mandarin Chinese: Two markers of plurality. Linguistics, 321, 91–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Izumi, S., & Lakshmanan, U. (1998). Learnability, negative evidence and the L2 acquisition of the English passive. Second Language Research, 141, 62–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jia, G. (2003). The acquisition of the English plural morpheme by native Mandarin Chinese-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(6), 1297–1311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. (1998). Case and Tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research, 14(1), 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition: A case study. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2), 173–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Y.-H. A. (1999). Plurality in a classifier language. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 81, 75–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lipski, J. (1994). Latin American Spanish. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1984). Function and process in spoken word recognition. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 125–150). Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 576–585. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, S. (1975). A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McIlwain, J., & Peterson, P. (2005). Signaling plurality in learner English. In I. Mushin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. University of Sydney. [URL]
Mellow, J. D., & Cumming, A. (1994). Concord in interlanguage: Efficiency or priming? Applied Linguistics, 151, 442–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, K. L., & Schmitt, C. (2012). Variable input and the acquisition of plural morphology. Language Acquisition, 19(3), 223–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Po-Ching, Y., & Rimmington, D. (2016). Chinese: A comprehensive grammar. 2nd edition. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 161, 103–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saleemi, A. (1992). Universal Grammar and language learnability. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 151, 147–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz, M., & Goad, H. (2017). Indirect positive evidence in the acquisition of a subset grammar. Language Acquisition, 24(3), 234–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2019). The Bottleneck Hypothesis updated. In T. Ionin & M. Rispoli (Eds.), Three streams of generative language acquisition research: Selected papers from the 7th meeting of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (pp. 319–345). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, J.-J. (2005). The Korean language: Structure, use and context. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trapman, M., & Kager, R. (2009). The acquisition of subset and superset phonotactic knowledge in a second language. Language Acquisition, 16(3), 178–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7(2), 133–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wightman, C. W., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Ostendorf, M., & Price, P. J. (1992). Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. The Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 91(3), 1707–1717. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Y., & Wang, B. (2002). Acoustic correlates of hierarchical prosodic boundary in Mandarin. Proceedings of Speech Prosody, 2002, 707–710. [URL]
Young, R. (1991). Variation in interlanguage morphology. Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue