Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 12:5 (2022) ► pp.571–597

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals

Evidence from the constituent-structure-independent passive priming between Cantonese and English

ORCiD logo with link | University of Hong Kong
ORCiD logo with link | University of California, Santa Barbara
Published online: 18 January 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.20046.son
Abstract
The current study explores the nature of constituent-structure-independent structural priming across the two languages of bilinguals. Specifically, this study tests whether such cross-linguistic priming involves the priming of functional-level syntactic representations shared between the languages, which can be distinguished from the priming of mainly non-syntactic information (e.g., information structure, thematic-role order). Critical prime sentences consisted of Cantonese actives in the Object-Subject-Verb (OSV) order and passives where the patient was grammatically topicalized with the same topic particle. Target responses were produced in English actives or passives. The results show that robust priming from Cantonese Topic-Passives to English passives occurred, but no cross-linguistic priming was observed for Cantonese Topic-OSV active primes. The Topic-OSV active and Topic-Passive constructions share information structure, and are formed in different constituent structures from English actives and passives. Therefore, the robust cross-linguistic passive priming by Topic-Passive primes should in large part be ascribed to functional-level syntactic representations of passive constructions shared by Cantonese and English.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Cross-linguistic structural priming and the shared-syntax account
    • 1.2Alternative interpretations of cross-linguistic structural priming
    • 1.3Present study
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Materials
    • 2.3Procedure
    • 2.4Scoring
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
References (36)
References
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4, Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(5), 931–949. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Persistence of emphasis in language production: A cross-linguistic approach. Cognition, 112(2), 300–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive psychology, 18(3), 355–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, J. K., & Levelt, W. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, H. P., & Pickering, M. J. (2017). An experimental approach to linguistic representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 401, e282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cai, Z. G., Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (2012). Mapping concepts to syntax: Evidence from structural priming in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 833–849. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, B., Jia, Y., Wang, Z., Dunlap, S., & Shin, J.-A. (2013). Is word-order similarity necessary for cross-linguistic structural priming? Second Language Research, 29(4), 375–389. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smedt, K. (1990). IPF: An incremental parallel formulator. In R. Dale, C. Mellish, & M. M. Zock (Eds.), Current research in natural language generation (pp. 167–192). Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleischer, Z., Pickering, M. J., & McLean, J. F. (2012). Shared information structure: Evidence from cross-linguistic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 568–579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. (2001). Syntax: An introduction (Vol. 11). John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Bernolet, S. (2017). Syntactic levels, lexicalism, and ellipsis: The jury is still out. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 401, e294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is Syntax Separate or Shared Between Languages? Cross-Linguistic Syntactic Priming in Spanish-English Bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15(6), 409–414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, J., Pickering, M. J., Chen, X., Cai, Z., Wang, S., & Branigan, H. P. (2019). Does language similarity affect representational integration? Cognition, 1851, 83–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hwang, H., Shin, J.-A., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2018). Late bilinguals share syntax unsparingly between L1 and L2: Evidence from crosslinguistically similar and different constructions. Language Learning, 68(1), 177–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacob, G., Katsika, K., Family, N., & Allen, S. E. M. (2017). The role of constituent order and level of embedding in cross-linguistic structural priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(2), 269–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. (2016). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loebell, H., & Bock, K. (2003). Structural priming across languages. Linguistics, 411, 791–824. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahowald, K., James, A., Futrell, R., & Gibson, E. (2016). A meta-analysis of syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 911, 5–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, S., & Yip, V. (2011). Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar (Second Edition). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muylle, M., Bernolet, S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2020). The role of case marking and word order in cross-linguistic structural priming in late L2 acquisition. Language Learning. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muylle, M., Bernolet, S., & Hartsuiker, R. (in prep). On the limits of shared syntactic representations: When word order variation blocks priming between an artificial language and Dutch. (Manuscript submitted for publication).
Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., … Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior research methods, 51(1), 195–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2002). Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(3), 586–605. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological bulletin, 134(3), 427–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prat-Sala, M., & Branigan, H. P. (2000). Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production: A cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(2), 168–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riemsdijk, H. C. V., & Williams, E. (1986). Introduction to the theory of grammar (No. 12). MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(2), 153–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shin, J.-A., & Christianson, K. (2009). Syntactic processing in Korean–English bilingual production: Evidence from cross-linguistic structural priming. Cognition, 112(1), 175–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, Y., & Do, Y. (2018). Cross-linguistic structural priming in bilinguals: priming of the subject-to-object raising construction between English and Korean. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(1), 47–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, Y., & Lai, R. K. Y. (in prep.). Syntactic representations encode grammatical functions: evidence from priming of mapping between grammatical functions and thematic roles in Cantonese. (Manuscript submitted for publication).
van Gompel, R. P. G., & Arai, M. (2018). Structural priming in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(3), 448–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vernice, M., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2019). Mapping thematic roles onto grammatical functions in sentence production: evidence from structural priming in Italian. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 3(1), 39–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vernice, M., Pickering, M. J., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2012). Thematic emphasis in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(5), 631–664. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, K., & Indefrey, P. (2009). Syntactic priming in German–English bilinguals during sentence comprehension. NeuroImage, 46(4), 1164–1172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Serratrice, Ludovica, Marta Wesierska, Vanessa Cieplinska & Katherine Messenger
2025. Teenage kicks: Exploring shared syntax through bidirectional crosslinguistic priming. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism DOI logo
Sze, Samuel Sui Lung, Xiaoyu Yu, Thomas Van Hoey, Bingzi Yu & Youngah Do
2025. Bilinguals’ advantages in executive function: Learning phonotactics and alternation. Second Language Research DOI logo
Hao, Jiuzhou & Vasiliki Chondrogianni
2023. Comprehension and production of non-canonical word orders in Mandarin-speaking child heritage speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 13:4 ► pp. 468 ff. DOI logo
Jiang, Nan
2023. The Study of Bilingual Language Processing, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue