Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 13:2 (2023) ► pp.218–237

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Native language, L2 experience, and pitch processing in music

 | Beijing Language and Culture University | Utrecht University
 | University of Amsterdam | Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
 | Tilburg University
 | University of Amsterdam
Published online: 16 July 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.20030.che
Abstract
The current study investigated how the role of pitch in one’s native language and L2 experience influenced musical melodic processing by testing Turkish and Mandarin Chinese advanced and beginning learners of English as an L2. Pitch has a lower functional load and shows a simpler pattern in Turkish than in Chinese as the former only contrasts between presence and the absence of pitch elevation, while the latter makes use of four different pitch contours lexically. Using the Musical Ear Test as the tool, we found that the Chinese listeners outperformed the Turkish listeners, and the advanced L2 learners outperformed the beginning learners. The Turkish listeners were further tested on their discrimination of bisyllabic Chinese lexical tones, and again an L2 advantage was observed. No significant difference was found for working memory between the beginning and advanced L2 learners. These results suggest that richness of tonal inventory of the native language is essential for triggering a music processing advantage, and on top of the tone language advantage, the L2 experience yields a further enhancement. Yet, unlike the tone language advantage that seems to relate to pitch expertise, learning an L2 seems to improve sound discrimination in general, and such improvement exhibits in non-native lexical tone discrimination.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Materials and methods
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Materials and procedure
      • Musical Ear Test, the melodic aptitude test
      • Memory tests
      • Self-reported language skills and history questionnaire
      • Music background questionnaire
      • Lexical tone discrimination task
  • 3.Statistical analysis
  • 4.Results and discussion
  • 5.General discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (45)
References
Bauer, R. S., & Benedict, P. K. (1997). Modern Cantonese phonology. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatara, A., Yeung, H. H., & Nazzi, T. (2015). Foreign language learning in french speakers is associated with rhythm perception, but not with melody perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(2), 277–282.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Green, D. W., & Gollan, T. H. (2009). Bilingual minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10(3), 89–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bidelman, G., Gandour, J., & Krishnan, A. (2011). Cross-domain effects of music and language experience on the representation of pitch in the human auditory brainstem. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 231, 425–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bidelman, G., Hutka, S., & Moreno, S. (2013). Tone language speakers and musicians share enhanced perceptual and cognitive abilities for musical pitch: Evidence for bidirectionality between the domains of language and music. Plos One, 81, e60676. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bradley, E. D. (2016). Phonetic dimensions of tone language effects on musical melody perception. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 26(4), 337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D. B., & Tohkura, Y. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(5), 977–985. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Callan, A. M., Callan, D. E., Tajima, K., Kubo, R., Masaki, S., & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2003). Learning-induced neural plasticity associated with improved identification performance after training of a difficult second-language phonetic contrast. Neuroimage, 19(1), 113–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, A., Liu, L., & Kager, R. (2016). Cross-domain correlation in pitch perception, the influence of native language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(6), 751–760. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, A., Peter, V., Wijnen, F., Schnack, H., & Burnham, D. (2018). Are lexical tones musical? native language’s influence on neural response to pitch in different domains. Brain and Language, 180–1821, 31–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delogu, F., Lampis, G., & Belardinelli, M. O. (2006). Music-to-language transfer effect: May melodic ability improve learning of tonal languages by native nontonal speakers? Cognitive Processing, 7(3), 203–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deutsch, D., Henthorn, T., Marvin, E., & Xu, H. (2006). Absolute pitch among American and Chinese conservatory students: Prevalence differences, and evidence for a speech-related critical period. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 119(2), 719–722. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437–470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gandour, J., & Harshman, R. (1978). Cross-language difference in tone perception: A multidimensional scaling investigation. Language and Speech, 211, 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gandour, J. (1983). Tone perception in far eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics, 111, 149–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garbin, G., Costa, A., Sanjuan, A., Forn, C., Rodriguez-Pujadas, A., Ventura, N., … Ávila, C. (2011). Neural bases of language switching in high and early proficient bilinguals. Brain and Language, 119(3), 129–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kempe, V., Bublitz, D., & Brooks, P. J. (2015). Musical ability and non-native speech-sound processing are linked through sensitivity to pitch and spectral information. British Journal of Psychology, 106(2), 349–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kraus, N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010). Music training for the development of auditory skills. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(8), 599–605. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krizman, J., Marian, V., Shook, A., Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2012). Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages. Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA, 109(20), 7877. Retrieved from [URL].
Lee, C. Y., & Hung, T. H. (2008). Identification of mandarin tones by English-speaking musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1241, 3235–3248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levi, S. V. (2005). Acoustic correlates of lexical accent in Turkish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 35(1), 73–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, C., & Thompson, S. A. (1989). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., Yamada, R. A., Tohkura, Y., & Yamada, T. (1994). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. long-term retention of new phonetic categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96(4), 2076–2087. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Margarita, K. (2007). The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940–967. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marie, C., Delogu, F., Lampis, G., Belardinelli, M., & Besson, M. (2011). Influence of musical expertise on segmental and tonal processing in mandarin Chinese. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 231, 2701–2715. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mechelli, A., Crinion, J. T., Noppeney, U., O’Doherty, J., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S., & Price, C. J. (2004). Structural plasticity in the bilingual brain. Nature, 431(7010), 757. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milovanov, R., Huotilainen, M., Välimäki, V., Esquef, P. A. A., & Tervaniemi, M. (2008). Musical aptitude and second language pronunciation skills in school-aged children: Neural and behavioral evidence. Brain Research, 11941, 81–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mok, P. K. P., & Zuo, D. (2012). The separation between music and speech: Evidence from the perception of cantonese tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(4), 2711–2720. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, C. B., & Jongman, A. (1997). Speaker normalization in the perception of mandarin chinese tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102(3), 1864–1877. Retrieved from [URL].
Osterhout, L., Poliakov, A., Inoue, K., McLaughlin, J., Valentine, G., Pitkanen, I., … Hirschensohn, J. (2008). Second-language learning and changes in the brain. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21(6), 509–521. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paap, K. R., & Greenberg, Z. I. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66(2), 232–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paap, K. R., Johnson, H. A., & Sawi, O. (2015). Bilingual advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined circumstances. Cortex, 691, 265–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfordresher, P., & Brown, S. (2009). Enhanced production and perception of musical pitch in tone language speakers. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 71(-6), 1385–1398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. [Doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roncaglia-Denissen, M., Bouwer, F. L., & Honing, H. (2018). Decision making strategy and the simultaneous processing of syntactic dependencies in language and music. Frontiers in Psychology, 91, 38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roncaglia-Denissen, M., Roor, D., Chen, A., & Sadakata, M. (2016). The enhanced musical rhythmic perception in second language learners. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 101, 288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roncaglia-Denissen, M., Schmidt-Kassow, M., Heine, A., Vuust, P., & Kotz, S. A. (2013). Enhanced musical rhythmic perception in turkish early and late learners of german. Frontiers in Psychology, 41, 645. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roncaglia-Denissen, M., Schmidt-Kassow, M., & Kotz, S. A. (2013). Speech rhythm facilitates syntactic ambiguity resolution: ERP evidence. Plos One, 8(2), e56000. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. (2009). When does age-related cognitive decline begin? Neurobiology of Aging, 30(4), 507–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schellenberg, E. G. (2015). Music training and speech perception: A gene-environment interaction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 13371, 170–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlegel, A. A., Rudelson, J. J., & Tse, P. U. (2012). White matter structure changes as adults learn a second language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(8), 1664–1670. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaefer, V., & Darcy, I. (2014). Lexical function of pitch in the first language shapes cross-linguistic perception of Thai tones. Laboratory Phonology, 51, 489–522. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slevc, L. R., & Miyake, A. (2006). Individual differences in second-language proficiency: Does musical ability matter? Psychological Science, 17(8), 675–681. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wallentin, M., Nielsen, A. H., Friis-Olivarius, M., Vuust, C., & Vuust, P. (2010). The musical ear test, a new reliable test for measuring musical competence. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 188–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wong, C. M. P., Skoe, E., Russo, N. M., Dees, T., & Kraus, N. (2007). Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 101, 420–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Jabeen, Farhat & Bettina Braun
2025. How cross–linguistic influence affects the use of duration in the production and perception of corrective and non–corrective focus types. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 15:2 ► pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Bo, Juan Yang & Zhijie Liang
2025. How music facilitates second language (L2) learning: a systematic review from 2002 to 2022. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 19:2 ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Chalikia, Magdalene H., Jyotsna Vaid & Natsuka Kobayashi
2024. Bilingual Language Experience May Alter Perception of the Tritone Paradox Evidence from Spanish/English Bilingual and English Monolingual Listeners in Texas. Auditory Perception & Cognition 7:4 ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue