References (20)
References
Avrutin, S. (2001). Linguistics and agrammatism. GLOT International, 5(3), 1䂿11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Weak Syntax. In K. Amundt & Y. Grodzinsky (Eds.), Broca’s region. Oxford: Oxford Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caha, P. (2009). Classical Armenian declension. In P. Svenonius, G. Ramchand, M. Starke, & T. Taraldsen (Eds.), Nordlyd (Vol. 361, special issue on Nanosyntax, pp. 77–112). CASTL, Tromsø. Available from [URL]
Chipere, N. (2001). Native speaker variations in syntactic competence: Implications for first language teaching. Language Awareness, 101, 107–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gold, E. M. (1967). Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 161, 447–474. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y., & Reinhart, T. (1993). The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry, 241, 69–102.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1997). Impoverishment and fission. In B. Bruening, Y. Kang, & M. McGinnis (Eds.), Papers at the Interface: MITWPL (Vol. 301, pp. 425–449). Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1962). Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. In Selected writings (Vol. 21, pp. 23–71). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kolk, H. (2004). Agrammatism. In Raymond Kent (Ed.), The MIT encyclopedia of communication disorders (pp. 231–233). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koornneef, A. (2008). Eye-catching anaphora. LOT International Dissertation Series, Utrecht University.
Koornneef, A., Avrutin, S., Wijnen, F., & Reuland, E. (2011). Tracking the preference for boundvariable dependencies in ambiguous ellipses and only-structures. In J. Runner (Ed.), Experiments at the interfaces (Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 371). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quine, W. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (2006). Interface strategies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reuland, E. (2011). Anaphora and language design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Townsend, D., & Bever,T. (2001). Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vasić, N. (2006). Pronoun comprehension in agrammatic aphasia: The structure and use of linguistic knowledge. Doctoral dissertation, LOT, Utrecht University.
Vasić, N., Avrutin, S., & Ruigendijk, E. (2006). Interpretation of pronouns in VP-ellipsis constructions in Dutch Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 96(2), 191–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wexler, K., & Culicover, P. (1980). Formal Principles of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Koornneef, Arnout & Eric Reuland
2016. On the Shallow Processing (Dis)Advantage: Grammar and Economy. Frontiers in Psychology 7 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue