Article published In: Epistemological issue with keynote article “Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment” by Ewa Dabrowska
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2:3] 2012
► pp. 219–253
keynote-epistemological-article
Different speakers, different grammars
Individual differences in native language attainment
Published online: 7 September 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab
This article reviews several recent studies suggesting that — contrary to a widespread belief — adult monolingual native speakers of the same language do not share the same mental grammar. The studies examined various aspects of linguistic knowledge, including inflectional morphology, passives, quantifiers, and more complex constructions with subordinate clauses. The findings suggest that, in some cases, language learners attend to different cues in the input and end up with different grammars; in others, some speakers extract only fairly specific, ‘local’ generalizations which apply to particular subclasses of items while others acquire more abstract rules which apply ‘across the board’. At least some of these differences are education-related: more educated speakers appear to acquire more general rules, possibly as a result of more varied linguistic experience. These findings have interesting consequences for research on bilingualism, particularly for research on ultimate attainment in second language acquisition, as well as important methodological implications for all language sciences.
Article outline
- Polish genitive singular masculine inflection
- Polish dative singular inflection
- Four complex English constructions
- Passives
- Quantifiers, and passives again
- Competence or performance?
- Reasons for individual differences
- Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (73)
Ambridge, B., Theakston. A.L., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2006). The distributed learning effect for children’s acquisition of an abstract grammatical construction. Cognitive Development, 211, p. 74–193.
Bever, T.G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279–362). New York, NY: Wiley.
(2004). Second language acquisition and ultimate attainment. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), Handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 82–105). London: Blackwell.
(2006). Age and second language acquisition and processing. A selective overview. Language Learning, 561, p. 9–46.
Birdsong, D., & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 441, p. 235–249.
Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 201, p. 3–49.
(2009). The evolving context of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 311, p. 175–198.
Brooks. P.J., & Sekerina. I.A. (2005/2006). Shortcuts to quantifier interpretation in children and adults. Language Acquisition, 131, p. 177–206.
Brooks, P.J., & Sekerina, I.A. (2006). Shallow processing of universal quantification: A comparison of monolingual and bilingual adults. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2450).
Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 101, p. 425–455.
Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., & Kao, C.F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 481, p. 306–307.
Cattell, R.B., & Cattell, H.E. P. (1973). Measuring intelligence with the culture-fair tests. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
Chipere, N. (2001). Native speaker variations in syntactic competence: Implications for first language teaching. Language Awareness, 101, p. 107–124.
Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language, 631, p. 544–573.
Cowart, W. (1997). Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Crain, S., & Lillo-Martin, D. (1999). An introduction to linguistic theory and language acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Crain, S., Thornton, R., Boster, C., Conway, L., Lillo-Martin, D., & Woodams, E. (1996). Quantification without qualification. Language Acquisition, 51, p. 83–153.
Dąbrowska, E. (1997). The LAD goes to school: A cautionary tale for nativists. Linguistics, 351, p. 735–766.
(2001). Learning a morphological system without a default: The Polish genitive. Journal of Child Language, 281, p. 545–574.
(2004). Language, mind and brain: Some psychological and neurological constraints on theories of grammar. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
(2008a). The later development of an early-emerging system: The curious case of the Polish genitive. Linguistics, 461, p. 629–650.
(2008b). The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers’ productivity with Polish case inflections: An empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 581, p. 931–951.
(2009). Constructing a second language: Some final thoughts. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 71, p. 277–290.
Dąbrowska, E., & Street, J. (2006). Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences, 281, p. 604–615.
Dąbrowska, E., Farmer, T. A., & Street, J. (in progress). (Non)Convergence in L1 and L2 acquisition.
Dąbrowska, E., & Szczerbiñski, M. (2006). Polish children’s productivity with case marking: the role of regularity, type frequency, and phonological coherence. Journal of Child Language, 331, p. 559–597.
Farmer, T.A., Misyak, J.B., & Christiansen, M.H. (in press). Individual differences in sentence processing. In M. Spivey, M. Joannisse, & K. McRae (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 471, p. 164–203.
Ferreira, F., Bailey. K.G.D., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 111, p. 11–15.
Ferreira, F., & Patson. N.D. (2007). The ‘good enough’ approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 11, p. 71–83.
Flege, J.E., Yeni-Komshian, G.H., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 411, p. 78–104.
Gathercole, S., Pickering, S., Knight, C., & Stegmann, Z. (2004). Working memory skills and educational attainment: Evidence from national curriculum assessments at 7 and 14 years of age. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 181, p. 1–16.
Ginsborg, J. (2006). The effects of socio-economic status on children’s language acquisition and use. In J. Clegg & J. Ginsborg (Eds.), Language and social disadvantage (pp. 9–27). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Gordon, P., & Chafetz, J. (1990). Verb-based versus class-based accounts of actionality effects in children’s comprehension of passives. Cognition, 361, p. 227–254.
Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 91, p. 97–129.
Hart, B., & Risley, R.R. (1999). The social world of children learning to talk. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
Hart, B., & Risley,T.R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brooks.
Herschensohn, J. (2009). Fundamental and gradient differences in language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 311, p. 259–289.
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 451, p. 337–374.
Johnson, J., & Newport, E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 211, p. 60–99.
Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 991, p. 122–149.
King, J., & Just, M.A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 301, p. 580–602.
Locke, A., & Ginsborg, J. (2003). Spoken language in the early years: the cognitive and linguistic development of three- to five-year-old children from socio-economically deprived backgrounds. Educational and Child Psychology, 201, p. 68–79.
MacDonald, M.C., & Christiansen, M.H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 1091, p. 35–54.
Maratsos, M., Fox, D.E.C., Becker, J.A., & Chalkley, M.A. (1985). Some restrictions on children’s passives. Cognition, 191, p. 167–191.
Montrul, S. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nowak, M.A., Komarova, N.L., & Niyogi, P. (2001). Evolution of Universal Grammar. Science, 2911, p. 114–118.
O’Grady, W., Lee, O.-S., & Lee, J.-H. (2011). Practical and theoretical issues in the study of language acquisition. Heritage Language Journal, 81, p. 23–40.
Orzechowska, A. (1998). Rzeczownik. In R. Grzegorczykowa, R. Laskowski, & H. Wróbel (Eds.), Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego: Morfologia (2nd ed., Vol. 11, pp. 270–332). Warszawa: PWN.
Otwinowska-Kaszelanic, A. (2000). Korpus języka mówionege młodego pokolenia Polaków. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie DIALOG.
Pakulak, E., & Neville, H. (2011). Maturational constraints on the recruitment of early processes for syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 231, p. 2752–2765.
Pearlmutter, N.J., & MacDonald, M.C. (1995.) Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 341, p. 521–542.
Perfetti, C.A., & McCutchen, D. (1987). Schooled language competence: Linguistic abilities in reading and writing. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Reading, writing, and language learning (Vol. 21, pp. 105–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pinker, S., Lebeaux. D.S., & Frost, L.A. (1987). Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive. Cognition, 261, p. 195–267.
Ross, J.R. (1979). Where’s English? In C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler, & W. S.-Y. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 127–163). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Schmidt, R.W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 111, p. 129–158.
Schütze, C.T. (1996). The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Seidenberg, M.S. (1997). Language acquisition and use: learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science, 2751, p. 1599–1603.
Smoczyñska, M. (1985). The acquisition of Polish. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: The data (Vol. 11, pp. 595–683). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sorace, A. (1993). Incomplete vs divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research, 91, p. 22–47.
Street, J., & Dąbrowska, E., 2010. More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers? Lingua 1201, p. 2080–2094.
(in press). Lexically specific knowledge and individual differences in adult native speakers’ processing of the English passive. Applied Psycholinguistics.
Swets, B., Desmet, T., Hambrick. D.Z., & Ferreira, F. (2007). The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1361, p. 64–81.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of child language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Townsend, D.J., & Bever, T.G. (2001). Sentence comprehension: Theintegration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cited by (202)
Cited by 202 other publications
Alhroot, Mohammad
Barking, Marie, Maria Mos & Ad Backus
Barking, Marie, Maria Mos & Ad Backus
2025. Individual variation in contact effects – stability, convergence, and divergence. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 15:3 ► pp. 370 ff.
Bloom, Barthe
Delaby, Gauthier & Timothy Colleman
2025. Constructional contamination between two constructions with krijgen ‘to get’ in Dutch. Constructions and Frames
Delaby, Gauthier, Timothy Colleman & Marithé Buysse
Elosua, Paula & David Lasagabaster
Fang, Shaohua, Hongchen Wu & Yang Zhao
Fokashchuk, Iryna
Hervé, Coralie & Laurel Lawyer
Hotta, Hikaru
Kligge, Hendrik A., Ewa Dąbrowska & Thorsten Piske
Mañas Navarrete, I., E. Rosado Villegas, S. Mujcinovic & N. Fullana Rivera
Namboodiripad, Savithry
Plaut-Forckosh, Dana & Natalia Meir
Quick, Antje Endesfelder
Quick, Antje Endesfelder, Marvin Zurek & Rachel Hatchard
Rothman, Jason, Fatih Bayram, Jiuzhou Hao & Patrick Rebuschat
Sommerer, Lotte & Freek Van de Velde
Treffers-Daller, Jeanine
Cheng, Lauretta S.P. & Savithry Namboodiripad
Doreleijers, Kristel & Jos Swanenberg
Gedik, Tan Arda
Gedik, Tan Arda
Gedik, Tan Arda
Gharibi, Khadij, Fatih Bayram & Gustavo Guajardo
2024. Lexical and morphosyntactic variation in Persian heritage language outcomes. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:6 ► pp. 886 ff.
Haim, Orly
Heeren, Jordi
2024. Academic and general language proficiency in post-entry language assessment. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 175:2 ► pp. 271 ff.
Ibbotson, Paul & William J. Browne
McConnell, Kyla, Florian Hintz & Antje S. Meyer
Montrul, Silvina & Andrew Armstrong
2024. The Literacy Enhancement Hypothesis in bilingual language development. In Multilingual Acquisition and Learning [Studies in Bilingualism, 67], ► pp. 60 ff.
Patterson, Kinga, James A. Street & Andriy Myachykov
Prela, Leonarda, Ewa Dąbrowska & Miquel Llompart
Rampinini, Alessandra, Irene Balboni, Narly Golestani & Raphael Berthele
Swan, Michael
Winckel, Elodie & Ewa Dąbrowska
Wright, Richenda, Salomé Geertsema, Mia le Roux, Elodie Winckel & Ewa Dąbrowska
Zar, Tamires, Sylvia Domingos Barrera, José Morais & Régine Kolinsky
Chernova, Daria, Artem Novozhilov & Natalia Slioussar
Coventry, Kenny R., Harmen B. Gudde, Holger Diessel, Jacqueline Collier, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes, Mila Vulchanova, Valentin Vulchanov, Emanuela Todisco, Maria Reile, Merlijn Breunesse, Helen Plado, Juergen Bohnemeyer, Raed Bsili, Michela Caldano, Rositsa Dekova, Katharine Donelson, Diana Forker, Yesol Park, Lekhnath Sharma Pathak, David Peeters, Gabriella Pizzuto, Baris Serhan, Linda Apse, Florian Hesse, Linh Hoang, Phuong Hoang, Yoko Igari, Keerthana Kapiley, Tamar Haupt-Khutsishvili, Sara Kolding, Katri Priiki, Ieva Mačiukaitytė, Vaisnavi Mohite, Tiina Nahkola, Sum Yi Tsoi, Stefan Williams, Shunei Yasuda, Angelo Cangelosi, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia, Ramesh Kumar Mishra, Roberta Rocca, Jurģis Šķilters, Mikkel Wallentin, Eglė Žilinskaitė-Šinkūnienė & Ozlem Durmaz Incel
De Houwer, Annick
de Jong, Nivja H.
DÍAZ‐CAMPOS, MANUEL & MATTHEW POLLOCK
Dąbrowska, Ewa, Esther Pascual, Beatriz Macías-Gómez-Estern & Miquel Llompart
Houghton, Zachary N. & Vsevolod Kapatsinski
HSIAO, Yaling, Nicola J. DAWSON, Nilanjana BANERJI & Kate NATION
Kim, Kathy MinHye, Ryo Maie, Kiyo Suga, Zachary F. Miller & Bronson Hui
Klassen, Rachel, Björn Lundquist & Marit Westergaard
Kozachenko, Oleksiy, Vitaliia Tozhyieva & Liudmyla Yakovenko
Llompart, Miquel & Ewa Dąbrowska
Munro, Murray J.
2023. Listening to the “noise” in the data. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 9:2 ► pp. 192 ff.
Navarro-Torres, Christian A., Paola E. Dussias & Judith F. Kroll
PEREK, FLORENT
Peristeri, Eleni, Maria Katsiperi, Eleni Fleva & Ianthi Tsimpli
2023. On the interaction of age, cognitive abilities, print exposure
and pronoun type in pronoun resolution. In Individual Differences in Anaphora Resolution [Language Faculty and Beyond, 18], ► pp. 68 ff.
Piepers, Joske, Ad Backus & Jos Swanenberg
Piepers, Joske, Ad Backus & Jos Swanenberg
Pleyer, Michael
Si, Aung & T. Mark Ellison
Stoops, Anastasia & Jessica L. Montag
Zhang, Yuhan, Rachel Ryskin & Edward Gibson
Ayoun, Dalila
Barking, Marie, Ad Backus & Maria Mos
Brown, James Dean & Theres Grüter
Desagulier, Guillaume
Dąbrowska, Ewa, Esther Pascual & Beatriz Macías Gómez-Estern
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
Hartmann, Stefan, Nikolas Koch & Antje Endesfelder Quick
Jiang, Canzhong & Xu Wen
Kirsch, Simon, Carolin Elser, Elena Barbieri, Dorothee Kümmerer, Cornelius Weiller & Mariacristina Musso
Mompean, Jose A.
Perez-Cortes, Silvia
Quick, Antje Endesfelder & Ad Backus
Ramsey, Rachel E.
Sanches de Oliveira, Guilherme & Maggie Bullock Oliveira
Vulchanova, Mila, Valentin Vulchanov, Antonella Sorace, Cristina Suarez-Gomez & Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes
Bayram, Fatih, Maki Kubota, Alicia Luque, Diego Pascual y Cabo & Jason Rothman
Beatty‐Martínez, Anne L., Michelle R. Bruni, María Teresa Bajo & Paola E. Dussias
Birdsong, David
2021. Analyzing variability in L2 ultimate attainment. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 12:1 ► pp. 133 ff.
Ditges, Ruth, Elena Barbieri, Cynthia K. Thompson, Sandra Weintraub, Cornelius Weiller, Marek-Marsel Mesulam, Dorothee Kümmerer, Nils Schröter & Mariacristina Musso
Favier, Saoradh & Falk Huettig
Favier, Saoradh & Falk Huettig
Fischer, Kerstin & Morgan Aarestrup
Gudmestad, Aarnes, Amanda Edmonds & Thomas Metzger
Hartmann, Stefan & Michael Pleyer
Menke, Mandy R. & Paul A. Malovrh
2021. The (limited) contributions of proficiency assessments in
defining advancedness. In Advancedness in Second Language Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 31], ► pp. 17 ff.
Montero-Melis, Guillermo
Quick, Antje Endesfelder, Ad Backus & Elena Lieven
Shadrova, Anna, Pia Linscheid, Julia Lukassek, Anke Lüdeling & Sarah Schneider
Singleton, David & Justyna Leśniewska
Sommerer, Lotte & Andreas Baumann
Wulff, Stefanie
Behrens, Heike
2020. From grammatical categories to processes of categorization. In Current perspectives on child language acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 27], ► pp. 91 ff.
BEHRENS, Heike
De Smet, Isabeau & Freek Van de Velde
Fonteyn, Lauren & Andrea Nini
Frank, Joshua
Geeraert, Kristina , John Newman & R. Harald Baayen
Grant, Angela, Kristina Coulter & Natalie Phillips
Kidd, Evan & Seamus Donnelly
Koch, Nikolas, Antje Endesfelder Quick & Stefan Hartmann
Krause, Elif, Tanja Rinker & Carsten Eulitz
2020. Investigating the effects of L1 proficiency and CLI. In Studies in Turkish as a heritage language [Studies in Bilingualism, 60], ► pp. 127 ff.
Lloyd-Smith, Anika, Fatih Bayram & Mike Iverson
2020. The effects of heritage language experience
on lexical and morphosyntactic outcomes. In Studies in Turkish as a heritage language [Studies in Bilingualism, 60], ► pp. 63 ff.
López-Beltrán, Priscila & Matthew T. Carlson
Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer
2020. Introduction. In Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 1 ff.
Ströbel, Marcus, Elma Kerz & Daniel Wiechmann
SUN, He, Siew Chin NG, Beth Ann O'BRIEN & Tom FRITZSCHE
Uhrig, Peter
Vanhove, Jan
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana & Turo Hiltunen
Andringa, Sible & Ewa Dąbrowska
Curcic, Maja, Sible Andringa & Folkert Kuiken
DeLuca, Vincent, David Miller, Christos Pliatsikas & Jason Rothman
Garibyan, Armine, Evelin Balog & Thomas Herbst
Janda, Laura A.
2019. Quantitative perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Janda, Laura A.
2021. Quantitative perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics. In Corpus Approaches to Language, Thought and Communication [Benjamins Current Topics, 119], ► pp. 7 ff.
Janda, Laura A. & Robert J. Reynolds
Johns, Michael A, Jorge R Valdés Kroff & Paola E Dussias
Mäkilähde, Aleksi
2019. Norms of correctness and rationality in research on code-switching. In Normativity in language and linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 209], ► pp. 235 ff.
Navarro-Torres, Christian A., Dalia L. Garcia, Vrinda Chidambaram & Judith F. Kroll
Pajunen, Anneli & Esa Itkonen
2019. Intuition and beyond. In Normativity in language and linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 209], ► pp. 213 ff.
Perez-Cortes, Silvia, Michael T. Putnam & Liliana Sánchez
Rothman, Jason, Fatih Bayram, Ian Cunnings & Jorge González Alonso
Aalberse, Suzanne & Aafke Hulk
Allen, Shanley E. M.
Azaz, Mahmoud & Joshua Frank
2018. Bidirectional cross-linguistic influence in late bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8:4 ► pp. 411 ff.
Dunn, Jonathan
Gonzales, Kalim, LouAnn Gerken & Rebecca L. Gómez
Hoffmann, Thomas
Hoffmann, Thomas
Ibbotson, Paul, Diana G. López & Alan J. McKane
Kapatsinski, Vsevolod
Kupisch, Tanja & Jason Rothman
Plath, Jennifer & Dominik Leiss
SUN, HE, BIN YIN, NUR FARINA BEGUM BINTE AMSAH & BETH ANN O'BRIEN
Tyler, Andrea E. & Lourdes Ortega
2018. Usage-inspired L2 instruction. In Usage-inspired L2 Instruction [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 49], ► pp. 3 ff.
Yang, Xiao, Utako Minai & Robert Fiorentino
Gablasova, Dana, Vaclav Brezina & Tony McEnery
Hall, Christopher J., Jack Joyce & Chris Robson
Linkov, Václav
Madlener, Karin, Katrin Skoruppa & Heike Behrens
Meisel, Jürgen M.
Street, James A.
Street, James A.
van Hell, Janet G. & Fatemeh Abdollahi
2017. Individual variation in syntactic processing in the second language. In Developmental Perspectives in Written Language and Literacy,
Zyzik, Eve
Divjak, Dagmar, Ewa Dąbrowska & Antti Arppe
Dyson, Bronwen Patricia
2016. Variation, individual differences and second language processing. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:4 ► pp. 341 ff.
Dąbrowska, Ewa
Dąbrowska, Ewa
2016. Looking into introspection. In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54], ► pp. 55 ff.
Dąbrowska, Ewa
Dąbrowska, Ewa
Flores, Cristina, Tanja Kupisch & Esther Rinke
Flores, Cristina, Tanja Kupisch & Esther Rinke
Hall, Joan Kelly
Koornneef, Arnout & Eric Reuland
Lahmann, Cornelia, Rasmus Steinkrauss & Monika S. Schmid
Matusevych, Yevgen, Afra Alishahi & Ad Backus
Noël, Dirk
2016. For a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 39 ff.
Noël, Dirk
Noël, Dirk
2019. The author and the text in radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar, or why historical linguists have started analysing text again. Functions of Language 26:1 ► pp. 56 ff.
Noël, Dirk
2019. The decline of the Deontic nci construction in Late Modern English. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1 ► pp. 22 ff.
Noël, Dirk
2022. Individual differences in the decline of the Deontic nci construction. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 9:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Pijpops, Dirk & Freek Van de Velde
Rothman, Jason, Ianthi Maria Tsimpli & Diego Pascual y Cabo
2016. Formal linguistic approaches to heritage language acquisition. In Advances in Spanish as a Heritage Language [Studies in Bilingualism, 49], ► pp. 13 ff.
Schmid, Monika S.
Verhagen, Véronique & Maria Mos
Zenner, Eline, Gitte Kristiansen & Dirk Geeraerts
2016. Individual differences and in situ identity marking. In Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 262], ► pp. 39 ff.
Cacoullos, Rena Torres & Catherine E. Travis
Cuza, Alejandro & Joshua Frank
Foucart, Alice
2015.
Prediction is a question of experience
. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4 ► pp. 465 ff.
Hager, Malin & Natascha Müller
Hautasaari, Ari & Naomi Yamashita
Hulstijn, Jan H.
2015. Explaining phenomena of first and second language acquisition with the constructs of implicit and explicit learning. In Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages [Studies in Bilingualism, 48], ► pp. 25 ff.
Hulstijn, Jan H.
Karczewski, Daniel & Olga Buivolova
Sullivan, Karen
Andringa, Sible
Andrén, Mats
Rothman, J. & J. Treffers-Daller
DeKeyser, Robert M.
Grüter, Theres
2013.
Individual differences and the nature of the processor. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3:3 ► pp. 312 ff.
Young-Scholten, Martha
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2019. Conclusion. In Sensory Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 20], ► pp. 235 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
