Article published In: Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 2:1 (2012) ► pp.25–53
Modeling morphological variation and development
Person and number in L2 Spanish
Published online: 10 February 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.1.02mcc
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.1.02mcc
This paper proposes a model of morphological variation and development grounded in feature-geometric theory. It tests two hypotheses that follow from this model on a corpus of data from speakers of Spanish as a second language (L2). First, variation is systematic; default, underspecified feature values are adopted when errors occur. This hypothesis is supported for person, number, and finiteness, as 3rd, singular, and nonfinite defaults surface in place of 1st, plural, and finite verbs. Second, developmental trends are observed as nodes are added to the geometry; the unmarked/less specified feature value is successfully produced prior to the marked/more specified one. This hypothesis is partially supported, as accuracy in 3rd person emerges prior to 1st. However, no developmental pattern is found for number. Errors in finiteness are limited to lower-proficiency speakers, whereas intermediate speakers favor 3rd person, finite defaults. Together, these results suggest systematic variation and gradual development in the morphology.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Morphological variability from syntax to features
- 3.The linguistic domain
- 3.1Person, number, and finiteness in Spanish
- 3.2Verb agreement in L2 Spanish
- 3.3A model of variation and development
- 4.Hypotheses
- 5.Method
- 5.1Coding procedure
- 5.2Exclusions
- 6.Results
- 6.1Overview of substitutions
- 6.2Feature effects and the repeated measures
- 6.2.1Person
- 6.2.2Number
- 6.2.3Finiteness
- 6.3Group effects
- 6.3.1Person
- 6.3.2Number
- 6.3.3Finiteness
- 7.Discussion
- 8.The missing-r analysis
- 8.1Type 1: Missing -r
- 8.2Type 2: Past
- 8.3Type 3: Stem-changing
- 8.4Type 4: Suppletive
- 8.5Type 5: Plural agreement
- 8.6Type 6: Present indicative of -ir class
- 9.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (46)
Aguado-Orea, J.J. (2004). The Acquisition of Morpho-syntax in Spanish: Implications for Current Theories of Development. PhD dissertation, University of Nottingham.
Brown, C. (1997). The acquisition of segmental structure: Consequences for speech perception and second language acquisition. Unpublished PhD dissertation, McGill University.
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2003a). The (dis)association between morphology and syntax: The case of L2 Spanish. In S.A. Montrul & F. Ordóñez (Eds.), Linguistic Theory and Language Development in Hispanic Languages (pp. 398–417). Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
(2003b). Learners’ competence may be more accurate than we think: Spanish L2 and agreement morphology. In J.M. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (GASLA 2006) (pp. 17–23). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
CHILDES: Child Data Language Exchange System (n.d.) Electronic resource: [URL]
.
Clahsen, H., Penke, M., & Parodi, T. (1993/1994). Functional categories in early child German. Language Acquisition, 3(4), 395–429.
Cowper, E. (2005). The geometry of interpretable features: Infl in English and Spanish. Language, 81(1), 10–46.
Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24(1), 37–53.
Greenberg, J.H. (1966). Language Universals with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.
Grimshaw, J. (1994). Minimal projection and clause structure. In B. Lust, M. Suñer, & J. Whiteman, (Eds.), Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Cross-linguistic Perspectives, Volume 1 (pp. 75–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S.J. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20: Linguistics Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hanson, R., Harley, R., & Ritter, E. (2000). Underspecification and universal defaults for person and number features. In Proceedings of the 2000 Canadian Linguistics Association. University of Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics. Electronic resource: [URL] (3 December 2010).
Harley, H., & Ritter, E. (2002). Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language, 78(3), 482–526.
Hawkins, R., & Casillas, G. (2008). Explaining frequency of verb morphology in early L2 speech. Lingua, 118(4), 595–612.
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C.Y. (1997). The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘Failed Functional Features Hypothesis.’ Second Language Research, 13(3), 187–226.
Haznedar, B., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) (pp. 293–306). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Herschensohn, J. (2001).
Missing inflection in L2 French: Accidental infinitives and other verbal deficits. Second Language Research, 17(3), 273–305.
Lardiere, D. (1998a). Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research, 14(1), 1–26.
(1998b). Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 14(4), 359–375.
(2005). On morphological competence. In L. Dekydtspotter, R.A. Sprouse, & A. Liljestrand (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (GASLA 2004) (pp. 178–192). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
(2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2), 173–227.
Major, R.C. (2004). Gender and stylistic variation in second language phonology. Language Variation and Change, 16(3), 169–188.
McCarthy, C. (2007). Morphological variability in second language Spanish. Unpublished PhD dissertation, McGill University.
(2008). Morphological variability in the comprehension of agreement: An argument for representation over computation. Second Language Research, 24(4), 459–486.
Mezzano, G. (2003). The development of Spanish verbal inflection in early stages of L2 acquisition. Undergraduate honors thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Montrul, S.A. (2004). The Acquisition of Spanish: Morphosyntactic Development in Monolingual and Bilingual L1 Acquisition and Adult L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Müller, N. (1998). UG access without parameter setting: A longitudinal study of (L1 Italian) German as a second language. In M.L. Beck (Ed.), Morphology and its Interfaces in Second Language Knowledge (pp. 115–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nevins, A., & Parrott, J.K. (2010). Variable rules meet Impoverishment theory: Patterns of agreement leveling in English varieties. Lingua, 120(5), 1135–1159.
Oltra-Massuet, I., & Arregi, K. (2005). Stress-by-structure in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(1), 43–84.
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing Surface Inflection or Impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16(2),103–133.
Sauerland, U. (2008). On the semantic markedness of Phi-features. In D. Harbour, D. Adger, & S. Béjar (Eds.), Phi Theory: Phi- Features across Modules and Interfaces (pp. 57–82). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sauerland, U., Anderssen, J., & Yatsushiro, K. (2005). The plural is semantically unmarked. In S. Kesper & M. Reis (Eds.), Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives (pp. 413–434). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Slabakova, R. (2009). How is inflectional morphology learned? EuroSLA Yearbook, 9(1), 56–75.
Spanish Learner Language Oral Corpora (SPLLOC) (2010). SPLLOC2 Guided Interview task. Retrieved from <[URL]>,<[URL]> (9 July 2010).
Suda, K., & Wakabayashi, S. (2007). The acquisition of pronominal case-marking by Japanese learners of English. Second Language Research, 23(2), 179–214.
(1985). Variability in interlanguage use: A study of style-shifting in morphology and syntax. Language Learning, 35(3), 373–403.
Vainikka, A. (1993/1994). Case in the development of English syntax. Language Acquisition, 3(3), 257–325.
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M. (1994). Direct access to X’-theory: Evidence from Korean and Turkish adults learning German. In T. Hoekstra & B.D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar (pp. 265–316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Di Pisa, Grazia, Sergio Miguel Pereira Soares, Jason Rothman & Theodoros Marinis
Alarcón, Irma
2021. Adjectival and verbal agreement in the oral production of early and late bilinguals. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 371 ff.
Bañón, José Alemán, David Miller & Jason Rothman
Covey, Lauren, Alison Gabriele & Robert Fiorentino
Slabakova, Roumyana
Romano, Francesco Bryan
2017. Morphological variability in L2 Italian. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 168:2 ► pp. 203 ff.
Blom, Elma, Vasiliki Chondrogianni, Theodoros Marinis & Nada Vasić
Chondrogianni, Vasiliki & Nada Vasić
Hopp, Holger & Mayra E. León Arriaga
Prego, Beatriz López & Alison Gabriele
2014.
Examining the impact of task demands on morphological variability in native and non-native Spanish*. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4:2 ► pp. 192 ff.
Hwang, Sun Hee & Donna Lardiere
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
