Commentary published In: Epistemological issue with keynote article “Prosodic effects on L2 grammars”
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6] 2019
► pp. 872–877
Commentary
The Prosodic Transfer Hypothesis in the grammar and its treatment of clitics
Published online: 8 October 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19077.nas
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19077.nas
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A general question on the model of prosodic representation
- 3.Questions on some specific issues
- 3.1The representation of affixal clitics and free clitics
- 3.2Strong forms of affixal clitics and free clitics
- Acknowledgements
References
References (18)
Cinque, G. (1996). The ‘antisymmetric’ programme: Theoretical and typological implications. Journal of Linguistics, 32(2), 447–464.
Kaye, J. D. (1995). Derivations and interfaces. In J. Durand & F. Katamba (Eds.), Frontiers of phonology: Atoms, structures, derivations (pp. 289–332). Harlow, Essex: Longman.
Kiparsky, P. (1982). From cyclic to Lexical Phonology. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations, vol. I1 (pp. 131–175). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Lowenstamm, J. (1996). CV as the only syllable type. In J. Durand & B. Laks (Eds.), Current trends in phonology: Models and methods (pp. 419–442). Salford: European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford Publications.
Onuma, H. & K. Nasukawa (2020). Velar softening without precedence relations. In K. Nasukawa (Ed.), Morpheme-internal recursion in phonology (pp. 201–229). Boston and Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Scheer, T. (2004). A lateral theory of phonology: What is CVCV and why should it be? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2008). Why the prosodic hierarchy is a diacritic and why the interface must be direct. In J. Hartmann, V. Hegedüs & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Sounds of silence: Empty elements in syntax and phonology (pp. 145–192). Oxford: Elsevier.
Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
