Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 12:5 (2022) ► pp.657–686

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Prosodic transfer across constructions and domains in L2 inflectional morphology

ORCiD logo with link | University of Southern Queensland
 | University of Southern Queensland
ORCiD logo with link | Korea Polytechnics
 | Pai Chai University
Published online: 1 March 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19076.aus
Abstract
Second language (L2) learners are known to have difficulty producing inflection in obligatory contexts reliably. According to the Prosodic Transfer Hypothesis (PTH), the prosodic organisation of L2 inflection is constrained by the inventory of representations available in the L1. At the same time, this hypothesis does not explicitly limit how freely prosodic representations can be transferred, so that transfer across constructions within the same domain (e.g., verbal domain: L1 tense → L2 agreement) and across domains (e.g., verbal domain: L1 tense → nominal domain: L2 plurals) are both possible in principle. The goal of this study was to determine if the current formulation of the PTH is valid, or must be reined in to exclude transfer across domains in particular. Forty-four Korean learners of English did a spoken sentence-construction task in which they had to produce subject-verb agreement and regular plural inflection. Bayesian hierarchical regression was used to analyse the results. By examining asymmetries in the suppliance of short- vs. long-stemmed inflection, we show that there are no grounds for attaching any stipulations to the PTH along the above lines, as prosodic representations are transferrable not only across constructions but also across domains.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Prosodic Transfer Hypothesis
    • 2.1Statement of the hypothesis
    • 2.2How freely can prosodic representations be transferred?
  • 3.Relevant morphosyntactic and prosodic-structural characteristics of Korean
    • 3.1Morphosyntax
    • 3.2Prosodic structure
  • 4.Predictions
  • 5.Methodology
    • 5.1Participants
    • 5.2Task
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Native speakers of English
    • 6.2Korean learners of English
  • 7.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • The following abbreviations are used in the glosses
  • References
References (44)
References
Audacity Team. (2017). Audacity: Free audio editor and recorder [Computer software]. [URL]
Austin, G. (2014). Asymmetries in L2 functional morphology: The Korean learner of English [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of New England (Australia).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, G., Pongpairoj, N., & Trenkic, D. (2015). Structural competition in second language production: Towards a constraint-satisfaction model. Language Learning, 65(3), 689–722. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Avery, P., & Radisić, M. (2007). Accounting for variability in the acquisition of English articles. In A. Belikova, L. Meroni, & M. Umeda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America (GALANA) (pp. 1–11). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, M. C. (2003). Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bürkner, P.-C. (2018). Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. The R Journal, 10(1), 395–411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, J., Campos-Dintrans, G., & Rothman, J. (2017). The role of L1 phonology in L2 morphological production: L2 English past tense production by L1 Spanish, Chinese, and Japanese speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 503–527. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., Brubaker, M., Guo, J., Li, P., & Riddell, A. (2017). Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software, 76(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corpus of Contemporary American English. (n.d.). [URL]
Garcia, G. D. (2020). Language transfer and positional bias in English stress. Second Language Research, 36(1), 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gelman, A., Carlin, J., Stern, H., Dunson, D., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. (2014). Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goad, H., & White, L. (2004). Ultimate attainment of L2 inflection: Effects of L1 prosodic structure. In S. Foster-Cohen, M. Sharwood Smith, A. Sorace, & M. Ota (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 41 (pp. 119–145). John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodic approach. Second Language Research, 22(3), 243–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Prosodic effects on L2 grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(6), 769–808. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goad, H., White, L., & Steele, J. (2003). Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations? Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 48(3/4), 243–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Casillas, G. (2008). Explaining frequency of verb morphology in early L2 speech. Lingua, 118(4), 595–612. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
IELTS. (n.d.). IELTS speaking band descriptors [PDF file]. [URL]
Jin, F., Åfarli, T. A., & van Dommelen, W. A. (2009). Variability in L2 acquisition of Norwegian DPs: An evaluation of some current SLA models. In M. Del Pilar, G. Mayo, & R. Hawkins (Eds.), Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications (pp. 175–199). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kabak, B., & Idsardi, W. (2007). Perceptual distortions in the adaptation of English consonant clusters: Syllable structure or consonantal contact constraints? Language and Speech, 50(1), 23–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ko, H. (2006). Base-output correspondence in Korean nominal inflection. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 15(3), 195–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kruschke, J. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. (1998). Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 14(4), 359–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Second language knowledge of [+/–Past] vs. [+/–Finite]. In J. M. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2002) (pp. 176–189). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlewood, W. T. (1981). Language variation and second language acquisition theory. Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 150–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mellow, J. D., & Cumming, A. (1994). Concord in interlanguage: Efficiency or priming? Applied Linguistics, 15(4), 442–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, M., & Colantoni, L. (2014). L2 English intonation: Relations between form-meaning associations, access to meaning, and L1 transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(2), 331–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Özçelik, Ö. (2016). The Prosodic Acquisition Path Hypothesis: Towards explaining variability in L2 acquisition of phonology. Glossa, 1(1), 28. 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Universal Grammar and second language phonology: Full Transfer / Prevalent Access in the L2 acquisition of Turkish “stress” by English and French speakers. Language Acquisition, 25(3), 231–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prevost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16(2), 103–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Selkirk, E. (1996). The prosodic structure of function words. In J. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 187–213). Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, J.-J. (1997). The so-called plural copy in Korean as a marker of distribution and focus. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(2), 203–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). The Korean language: Structure, use and context. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, Y. (2015). L2 processing of plural inflection in English. Language Learning, 65(2), 233–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Su, J. (2019). Reassembly of plural and human features in the L2 acquisition of Chinese by adult Korean speakers. Second Language Research, 35(4), 529–555. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Hulst, H., & van de Weijer, J. (1995). Vowel harmony. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 495–534). Blackwells.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vehtari, A. (2020, August 27). More limitations of cross-validation and actionable recommendations [Blog post]. [URL]
Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., & Gabry, J. (2017). Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Statistical Computing, 27(5), 1413–1432. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watanabe, S. (2010). Asymptotic equivalence of Bayes cross validation and widely applicable information criterion in singular learning theory. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 111, 3571–3594. [URL]
Yoon, J. (2005). Non-morphological determination of nominal particle ordering in Korean. In L. Heggie & F. Ordonez (Eds.), Clitic and affix combinations: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 239–282). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwicky, A., & Pullum, G. (1983). Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t . Language, 59(3), 502–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

White, Lydia, Heather Goad, Guilherme Duarte Garcia, Natália Brambatti Guzzo, Liz Smeets & Jiajia Su
2025. Pronoun interpretation in Italian. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 15:3 ► pp. 311 ff. DOI logo
Saito, Kazuya, Konstantinos Macmillan, Sascha Kroeger, Viktoria Magne, Kotaro Takizawa, Magdalena Kachlicka & Adam Tierney
2022. Roles of domain-general auditory processing in spoken second-language vocabulary attainment in adulthood. Applied Psycholinguistics 43:3 ► pp. 581 ff. DOI logo
Goad, Heather & Lydia White
2019. Prosodic effects on L2 grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6 ► pp. 769 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue