Commentary published In: Epistemological issue with keynote article “Prosodic effects on L2 grammars”
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6] 2019
► pp. 883–887
Commentary
Evidence for syntactic feature transfer between two languages
Published online: 7 October 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19058.sch
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19058.sch
References (16)
Finocchiaro, C., Alario, F.-X., Schiller, N. O., Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2011). Gender congruency goes Europe: A cross-linguistic study of the gender congruency effect in Romance and Germanic languages. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 231, 161–198.
Ganushchak, L. Y., Verdonschot, R. G., & Schiller, N. O. (2011). When leaf becomes neuter: event-related potential evidence for grammatical gender transfer in bilingualism. Neuro Report, 221, 106–110.
Goad, H. & White, L. (2019). Prosodic Effects on L2 Grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.
Goad, H., White, L., & Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2011). Prosodic transfer at different levels of structure: The L2 acquisition of Spanish plurals. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development: Online Proceedings Supplement.
Hawkins, R. (2000). Persistent selective fossilisation in second language acquisition and the optimal design of the language faculty. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 341, 75–90.
Hawkins, R., & Franceschina, F. (2004). Explaining the acquisition and non-acquisition of determiner-noun gender concord in French and Spanish. In P. Prévost & J. Paradis (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts (pp. 175–205). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hawkins, R., & Liszka, S. (2003). Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken, & R. Towell (Eds.), The interface between syntax and lexicon in second language acquisition (pp. 21–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
La Heij, W., Mak, P., Sander, J., & Willeboordse, E. (1998). The gender-congruency effect in picture-word tasks. Psychological Research, 611, 209–219.
Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 251, 907–922.
Rothman, J. (2015). Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 181, 179–190.
Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Grammatical gender selection and the representation of morphemes: The production of Dutch diminutives. Language and Cognitive Processes, 211, 945–973.
Schiller, N. O., & Costa, A. (2006). Different selection principles of free-standing and bound morphemes in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 321, 1201–1207.
Schiller, N. O. (2013). Psycholinguistic approaches to the investigation of grammatical gender in speech production: An overview and new data. In G.C. Corbett, (ed.), The Expression of Gender (161–190). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
