Cover not available

Commentary published In: Epistemological issue with keynote article “Prosodic effects on L2 grammars”
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6] 2019
► pp. 833–837

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Commentary

‘Minimal adaptation’ and the edges of prosodic domains

ORCiD logo with link | Universität Konstanz
Published online: 14 October 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19056.deh
References (14)
References
Árnason, K. (2005). Hljóð. Handbók um hljóðfræði og hljóðkerfisfræði. Íslensk Tunga, I1. Bindi. Reykjavík: Almenna bókafélagið.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). The phonology of Icelandic and Faroese. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goad, H. & White, L. (2004). Ultimate attainment of L2 inflection: Effects of L1 prosodic structure. In S. H. Foster-Cohen, M. Sharwood-Smith, A. Sorace & M. Ota (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 41 (pp. 119–145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: a prosodic approach. Second Language Research, 22(3), 243–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Prosodic transfer and the representation of determiners in Turkish-English interlanguage. In N. Snape, Y. I. Leung & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), Representational deficits in SLA: Studies in honor of Roger Hawkins (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Prosodic Effects on L2 Grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goad, H., White, L. & Steele, J. (2003). Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations? Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 48(3/4), 243–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, T. A. (1999). Phonotactics and the prosodic structure of German function words. In T. A. Hall & U. Kleinhenz (Eds.), Studies on the phonological word (pp. 99–131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orešnik, J. (1972). On the epenthesis rule in Modern Icelandic. Arkiv för nordisk filologi, 871, 1–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1977). Modern Icelandic u-umlaut from the descriptive point of view. Gripla, 2(1), 151–182.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, E. (1981). U-hljóðvarp og önnur a~ö víxl í nútímaíslensku. Íslenskt mál, 31, 25–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Hljóðkerfi og orðhlutakerfi íslensku. [Electronic edition] Reykjavík. [URL], accessed August 2019.
Selkirk, E. (1996). The prosodic structure of function words. In J. L. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 187–213). Mahwak, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skrzypek, D. (2009). The formation of the definite article in the Nordic languages. Lingua Posnaniensis, 51(1), 65–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue