Commentary published In: Epistemological issue with keynote article “Prosodic effects on L2 grammars”
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6] 2019
► pp. 827–832
Commentary
Prosodic effects on L2 grammars
From competence constraints to a learning research agenda
Published online: 3 December 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19050.car
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19050.car
References (23)
Baeskow, H. (2004). Lexical properties of selected non-native morphemes of English. Tübingen: Günter Narr Verlag.
Carroll, S. E. (2001). Input and evidence: the raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2012). First exposure learners make use of top-down lexical knowledge when learning new words. In K. Braunmüller, C. Gabriel & B. Hänel-Faulhaber (Eds.), HSM13 Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies (pp. 23–45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2013). Introduction to the special issue: Aspects of word learning on first exposure to a second language. Second Language Research, 291, 131–144.
(2014). Processing ‘words’ in early stage SLA: A comparison of first exposure and early stage learners. In Z. H. Han & R. Rast (Eds.), First exposure to a second language acquisition (pp. 107–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carroll, S. E., & Hracs, L. (2018). Inferring the meanings of words from visual and linguistic context: Word learning in absolute beginners. Research Methodology in the Field of Second Language Acquisition & Learning/Les méthodologies de la recherche dans le domaine de l’acquisition et de l’apprentissage des langues secondes. May 31, 2018, Université de Paul-Valéry, Montpellier III, Montpellier France.
Carroll, S. E., & Widjaja, E. (2013). Learning exponents of number on first exposure to an L2. Second Language Research, 291, 201–229.
Carroll, S. E., & Windsor, J. W. (2015). Segmental targets versus lexical interference: Production of second-language targets on first exposure with minimal training. In H. Peukert (Ed.), Transfer effects in multilingual language development (pp. 53–85). HSLD4. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cutler, A. (2012). Native listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.
Cutler, A., & Carter, D. M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech & Language, 21, 133–142.
Finn, A., & Hudson Kam, K. (2008). The curse of knowledge: First language knowledge impairs adult learners’ use of novel statistics for word segmentation. Cognition, 1081, 477–99.
Goad, H. & White, L. (2019). Prosodic Effects on L2 Grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.
Goad, H., White, L., & Steele, J. (2003). Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations? Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 481, 243–263.
Goldschneider, J. M., and DeKeyser, R. M. (2001). Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 511, 1–50.
Gullberg, M., Roberts, L., Dimroth, C., Veroude, K., & Indefrey, P. (2010). Adult language learning after minimal exposure to an unknown natural language. Language Learning, 60, Supplement 21, 5–24.
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language. Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kenney, J. (2017). Leaping the lexical bar. Blog. Accessed August 7, 2019. [URL]
Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1997). The Basic Variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?), Second Language Research, 131, 301–47.
MacWhinney, B. (2005). New directions in the Competition Model. In M. Tomasello & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Beyond nature-nurture: Essays in honor of Elizabeth Bates (pp. 81–110). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Saffran, J., Newport, E., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory & Language, 351, 606–621.
Wulff, S., and Ellis, N. C. (2018). Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition. In D. Miller, F. Bayram, J. Rothman & L. Serratrice (Eds.), Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields (pp. 37–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.