References (7)
References
Biberauer, T. (2017). Factors 2 and 3: a principled approach. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 101: 38–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 361, 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gervain, J. & Werker, J. (2008). How infant speech perception contributes to language acquisition. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(6), 1149–1170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kidd, C., Piatandosi, S. & Aslin, R. (2012). The Goldilocks Effect: human infants allocate attention to visual sequences that are neither too simple nor too complex. PLoS ONE 7(5), e36399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, C. (2004). Universal Grammar, statistics, or both? Trends in Cognitive Science 101, 451–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). A formalist perspective on language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6(6), 665–706. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Araújo-Adriano, Paulo Ângelo & Rafael Beraldo
2023. Implementing the U-shaped curve in Distributed Morphology and as a by-product of the third factor. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 22:1 DOI logo
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T.
2021. Children do not ignore (null objects): Against deficit accounts of the null object stage in language acquisition. Arborescences :10  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Charles
2018. Some consequences of the Tolerance Principle. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8:6  pp. 797 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue