Mechanistic formal approaches to language acquisition: Yes, but at the right level(s) of resolution

Gries, Stefan Th.

doi:10.1075/lab.18050.gri

Commentary published In: Epistemological issue with keynote article “A Formalist Perspective on Language Acquisition” by Charles Yang
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8:6] 2018
► pp. 733–737

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

Commentary

Mechanistic formal approaches to language acquisition

Yes, but at the right level(s) of resolution

Stefan Th. Gries | University of California, Santa Barbara

Published online: 26 November 2018

https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.18050.gri

References (13)

References

Ambridge, B., Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., & Tomasello, M. (2006). The distributed learning effect for children’s acquisition of an abstract syntactic construction. Cognitive Development, 21(2), 174–193.

Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, N. (2016). Creating language: integrating evolution, acquisition, and processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Ellis, N. C. (2006). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 1–24.

(2016). Cognition, corpora, and computing: triangulating research in usage-based language learning. Language Learning, 67(51), 40–65.

Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2016). Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and processing. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

Gries, St. Th. (2008). Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 403–437.

. (2018). Operationalizations of domain-general mechanisms cognitive linguists often rely on: a perspective from quantitative corpus linguistics. In S. Engelberg, H. Lobin, K. Steyer, & S. Wolfer (Eds.), Wortschätze: Dynamik, Muster, Komplexität (pp. 75–90). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.

Gries, St. Th. & Ellis, N. C. (2015). Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning, 65(Supplement 1), 1–28.

Pine, J. M., Freudental, D., Krajewskyi, G., & Gobet, F. (2013). Do young children have adult-like syntactic categories? Zipf’s law and the case of the determiner. Cognition, 127(3), 345–360.

Smith, N. J. & Levy, R. (2013). The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic. Cognition, 128(3), 302–319.

Tomasello, M. & Stahl, D. (2004). Sampling children’s spontaneous speech: how much is enough? Journal of Child Language, 31(1), 101–121.

Yang, C. (2018). A formalist perspective on language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 665–706.

Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Order by:

Enger, Hans-Olav

2022. Type frequency is not the only factor that determines productivity, so the Tolerance Principle is not enough. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 144:2 ► pp. 161 ff.

Bayram, Fatih, Grazia Di Pisa, Jason Rothman & Roumyana Slabakova

2021. Current Trends and Emerging Methodologies in Charting Heritage Language Grammars. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 545 ff.

Rastelli, Stefano

2020. The acquisition of aspect in a second language,

Rastelli, Stefano

2020. Contingency learning and perfective morpheme productivity in L2 Italian: A study on lexeme–morpheme associations with ΔP. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:3 ► pp. 459 ff.

Rastelli, Stefano

2025. Third-way linguistics: generative and usage-based theories are both right. Language Sciences 107 ► pp. 101685 ff.

[no author supplied]

2021. Research Approaches to Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 373 ff.

[no author supplied]

2024. The Frequency-Grammar Interface [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 20],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.