Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 10:6 (2020) ► pp.805–846

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Visual working memory load constrains language non-selective activation under task-demands

 | University of Hyderabad
 | University of Hyderabad
 | University of Hyderabad
Published online: 3 June 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.18045.pra
Abstract
Visual world studies with bilinguals have demonstrated spontaneous cross-linguistic activations. In two experiments, we examined whether concurrent visual working memory (VWM) load constrains bilingual parallel activation during spoken word comprehension. Hindi-English bilinguals heard a spoken word in Hindi (L1) or English (L2) and saw a display containing the spoken word-referent, a phonological cohort of the spoken word’s translation and two unrelated objects. Participants completed a concurrent WM task of remembering an array of five coloured squares and judging its similarity with a test array. Participants were asked to click on the spoken word-referent in Experiment 1 but not in Experiment 2. Reduced parallel activation and enhanced target activation was observed under the load for L2 spoken words in Experiment 1 (where the task-demands were high). The findings suggest that a VWM load can constrain the spontaneous activation of an irrelevant lexicon, under certain conditions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Current study
  • 2.Experiment 1
    • 2.1Method
      • 2.1.1Participants
      • 2.1.2Stimuli
      • 2.1.3Control measures
      • 2.1.4Apparatus
      • 2.1.5Procedure
    • 2.2Data analysis
      • 2.2.1Eye movements
      • 2.2.2Manual responses
    • 2.3Results
      • 2.3.1Proportion of fixations
      • 2.3.2First saccade latency
      • 2.3.3Manual responses on visual world task
      • 2.3.4WM task
    • 2.4Discussion
  • 3.Experiment 2
    • 3.1Methods
      • 3.1.1Participants
      • 3.1.2Stimuli & procedure
    • 3.2Data analysis
    • 3.3Results
      • 3.3.1Proportion of fixations
      • 3.3.2First saccade latency
      • 3.3.3WM task
    • 3.4Discussion
  • 4.General discussion
    • 4.1Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (43)
References
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2004). Now you see it, now you don’t: Mediating the mapping between language and the visual world. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Interfacing language, vision, and action (pp. 347–386). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ardila, A. (2003). Language representation and working memory with bilinguals. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 233–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barr, D. J. (2008). Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 457–474. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, D., Prasad, S. G., Sake, K., & Mishra, R. K. (2017). Task Irrelevant External Cues Can Influence Language Selection in Voluntary Object Naming: Evidence from Hindi-English Bilinguals. PloS One, 12(1), e0169284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2013). Parallel language activation and cognitive control during spoken word recognition in bilinguals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 547–567. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christoffels, I. K., De Groot, A. M., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). Memory and language skills in simultaneous interpreters: The role of expertise and language proficiency. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(3), 324–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christoffels, I. K., Ganushchak, L., & Koester, D. (2013). Language conflict in translation: An ERP study of translation production. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 646–664. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilingual’s two lexicons compete for selection?. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(3), 365–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 491–511. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s “Speaking” Model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 131, 1–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In J. Nicol (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hadar, B., Skrzypek, J. E., Wingfield, A., & Ben-David, B. M. (2016). Working memory load affects processing time in spoken word recognition: evidence from eye-movements. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 101, Article 221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasegawa, M., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (2002). An fMRI study of bilingual sentence comprehension and workload. Neuroimage, 15(3), 647–660. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huettig, F., Olivers, C. N., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2011). Looking, language, and memory: Bridging research from the visual world and visual search paradigms. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 138–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huettig, F., Mishra, R. K., & Olivers, C. N. (2012). Mechanisms and representations of language-mediated visual attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 21, Article 394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huettig, F., & Janse, E. (2016). Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 80–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ito, A., Corley, M., & Pickering, M. J. (2018). A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(2), 251–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, S. Y., Kim, M. S., & Chun, M. M. (2005). Concurrent working memory load can reduce distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(45), 16524–16529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M. W. (2006). The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: Evidence from eye tracking. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 481–529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Konstantinou, N., Beal, E., King, J. R., & Lavie, N. (2014). Working memory load and distraction: dissociable effects of visual maintenance and cognitive control. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(7), 1985–1997. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Michael, E., Tokowicz, N., & Dufour, R. (2002). The development of lexical fluency in a second language. Second Language Research, 18(2), 137–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P., & Licata, L. (2013). Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 764–766. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, P. H., & Luck, S. J. (2012). Proactive interference does not meaningfully distort visual working memory capacity estimates in the canonical change detection task. Frontiers in Psychology, 31, Article 42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marian, V., & Spivey, M. (2003). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within-and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(2), 97–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mercier, J., Pivneva, I., & Titone, D. (2014). Individual differences in inhibitory control relate to bilingual spoken word processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(1), 89–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mishra, R. K., Olivers, C. N., & Huettig, F. (2013). Spoken language and the decision to move the eyes: To what extent are language-mediated eye movements automatic? In Progress in brain research. 2021, (pp.135–149). Elsevier. Amsterdam: Netherlands.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mishra, R. K., & Singh, N. (2014). Language non-selective activation of orthography during spoken word processing in Hindi–English sequential bilinguals: an eye tracking visual world study. Reading and Writing, 27(1), 129–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). The influence of second language proficiency on bilingual parallel language activation in Hindi–English bilinguals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(4), 396–411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pivneva, I., Mercier, J., & Titone, D. (2014). Executive control modulates cross-language lexical activation during L2 reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 787.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. J. Solso (Ed.), Information Processing and Cognition: the Loyola Symposium (pp. 55–85); Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roychoudhuri, K. S., Prasad, S. G., & Mishra, R. K. (2016). Iconic Native Culture Cues Inhibit Second Language Production in a Non-immigrant Population: Evidence from Bengali-English Bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, 1516. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N. (1991). Does advanced skill in a second language reduce automaticity in the first language? Language Learning, 41(1), 59–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Singh, N., & Mishra, R. K. (2015). Unintentional activation of translation equivalents in bilinguals leads to attention capture in a cross-modal visual task. PloS One, 10(3), e0120131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saslow, M. G. (1967). Latency for saccadic eye movement. JOSA, 57(8), 1030–1033. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spivey, M. J., & Marian, V. (1999). Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science, 10(3), 281–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sunderman, G., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). First language activation during second language lexical processing: An investigation of lexical form, meaning, and grammatical class. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(3), 387–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sunderman, G. L., & Priya, K. (2012). Translation recognition in highly proficient Hindi–English bilinguals: The influence of different scripts but connectable phonologies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(9), 1265–1285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632–1634. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Titone, D., Libben, M., Mercier, J., Whitford, V., & Pivneva, I. (2011). Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1–L2 intermixing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1412.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(1), 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Prasad, Seema, Shivam Puri, Keerthana Kapiley, Riya Rafeekh & Ramesh Mishra
2025. Looking Without Knowing: Evidence for Language-Mediated Eye Movements to Masked Words in Hindi-English Bilinguals. Languages 10:2 ► pp. 32 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue