Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 10:4 (2020) ► pp.441–470

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Visual recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs in two non-native languages

Evidence from Asian adult trilinguals

 | The Chinese University of Hong Kong
ORCiD logo with link | The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Published online: 29 June 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.17049.zhu
Abstract
Previous studies on bilingual visual word recognition have been mainly based on European participants, while less is understood about Asian populations. In this study, the recognition of German-English cognates and interlingual homographs in lexical decision tasks was examined in the two non-native languages of Cantonese-English-German trilinguals. In the L2 English task, cognates were reacted to faster and more accurately than their matched non-cognates, while in the equivalent L3 German task, no cognate facilitation effect was found. However, cognate facilitation effects on response time and accuracy were observed in another L3 German task including cognates and interlingual homographs. The study suggests that Asian trilinguals access L2 and L3 in a language non-selective manner, despite their low proficiency in the recently acquired L3. Meanwhile, lexical processing in a non-proficient L3 is to a great extent affected by multiple contextual factors.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Experiment 1 – Cognates in an L2 English-only LDT
    • 2.1Methods
      • 2.1.1Participants
      • 2.1.2Materials
      • 2.1.3Procedure
    • 2.2Results
      • 2.2.1RTs
      • 2.2.2Error rates
    • 2.3Discussion
  • 3.Experiment 2 – Cognates in an L3 German-only LDT
    • 3.1Methods
      • 3.1.1Participants
      • 3.1.2Materials and procedures
    • 3.2Results
      • 3.2.1RTs
      • 3.2.2Error rates
      • 3.2.3Post hoc analyses
    • 3.3Discussion
  • 4.Experiment 3 – Cognates and interlingual homographs in an L3 German-only LDT
    • 4.1Methods
    • 4.2Results
      • 4.2.1RTs
      • 4.2.2Error rates
    • 4.3Discussion
  • 5.General discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (45)
References
Aparicio, X., & Lavaur, J.-M. (2016). Masked Translation Priming Effects in Visual Word Recognition by Trilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 451, 1369–1388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aparicio, X., Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., Pu, H., Lavaur, J. M., & Grainger, J. (2012). Language effects in trilinguals: An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 31, 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 391, 445–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bice, K., & Kroll, J. F. (2015). Native language change during early stages of second language learning. NeuroReport, 261, 966–971. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brenders, P., Van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2011). Word recognition in child second language learners: Evidence from cognates and false friends. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1091, 383–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caramazza, A., & Brones, I. (1979). Lexical access in bilinguals. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 131, 212–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 371, 65–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Groot, A. M. B., & Nas, G. L. J. (1991). Lexical representation of cognates and noncognates in compound bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 301, 90–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 411, 496–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Miwa, K., Brummelhuis, B., Sappelli, M., & Baayen, H. (2010). How cross-language similarity and task demands affect cognate recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 621, 284–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Timmermans, M., & Schriefers, H. (2000). On Being Blinded by Your Other Language: Effects of Task Demands on Interlingual Homograph Recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 421, 445–464. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 51, 175–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Van Jaarsveld, H. J., & Ten Brinke, S. (1998). Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 51–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elston-Güttler, K. E., Gunter, T. C., & Kotz, S. A. (2005). Zooming into L2: Global language context and adjustment affect processing of interlingual homographs in sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 251, 57–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerard, L. D., & Scarborough, D. L. (1989). Language-specific lexical access of homographs by bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 151, 305–315.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In J. L. Nicol (Ed.), One Mind, Two Languages: Bilingual Language Processing (pp. 1–22). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirsner, K., Lalor, E., & Hird, K. (1993). The bilingual lexicon: Exercise, meaning and morphology. In R. Schreuder & B. Weltens (Eds.), The Bilingual Lexicon (pp. 215–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Michael, E., Tokowicz, N., & Dufour, R. (2002). The development of lexical fluency in a second language. Second Language Research, 181, 137–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Sumutka, B. M., & Schwartz, A. I. (2005). A cognitive view of the bilingual lexicon: Reading and speaking words in two languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 91, 27–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., & Dijkstra, T. (2004). Recognizing cognates and interlingual homographs: effects of code similarity in language-specific and generalized lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 321, 533–550. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., Dijkstra, T., & Michel, M. (2004). Three languages, one ECHO: Cognate effects in trilingual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 191, 585–611. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenth, Russell V. (2016). Least-Squares Means: The R Package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 691, 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 221, 1–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levenshtein, V. I. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 101, 707–710.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Logan, J. M., & Balota, D. A. (2003). Conscious and unconscious lexical retrieval blocking in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 181, 537–550. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marian, V., Bartolotti, J., Chabal, S., & Shook, A. (2012). CLEARPOND: cross-linguistic easy-access resource for phonological and orthographic neighborhood densities. PloS One, 71, e43230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2011). Effects of cognate status on word comprehension in second language learners: An ERP investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 231, 1634–1647. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O Laoire, M. (2005). L3 in Ireland: A preliminary study of learners’ metalinguistic awareness. In B. Hufeisen & R. Fouser (Eds.), Introductory readings in L3 (pp. 47–55). Tubingen, Germany: Stauffenberg Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peeters, D., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (2013). The representation and processing of identical cognates by late bilinguals: RT and ERP effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 681, 315–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poarch, G. J., & Van Hell, J. G. (2012). Cross-language activation in children’s speech production: Evidence from second language learners, bilinguals, and trilinguals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1111, 419–438. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Cross-language activation in same-script and different-script trilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 181, 693–716. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poort, E. D., & Rodd, J. M. (2017). The cognate facilitation effect in bilingual lexical decision is influenced by stimulus list composition. Acta Psychologica, 1801. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poort, E. D., Warren, J. E., & Rodd, J. M. (2016). Recent experience with cognates and interlingual homographs in one language affects subsequent processing in another language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 191, 206–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez-Casas, R. M., Davis, C. W., & García-Albea, J. E. (1992). Bilingual lexical processing: Exploring the cognate/noncognate distinction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 41, 293–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scarborough, D. L., Gerard, L., & Cortese, C. (1984). Independence of lexical access in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 231, 84–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siyambalapitiya, S., Chenery, H. J., & Copland, D. A. (2009). Bilingualism and aging: Reversal of the cognate advantage in older bilingual adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 301, 531–554. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szubko-Sitarek, W. (2011). Cognate facilitation effects in trilingual word recognition. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11, 189–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Multilingual Lexical Recognition in the Mental Lexicon of Third Language Users. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Hell, J. G., & De Groot, A. M. B. (1998). Conceptual representation in bilingual memory: Effects of concreteness and cognate status in word association. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 193–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 91, 780–789. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Hell, J. G., & Poarch, G. J. (2014). How much bilingual experience is needed to affect executive control. Applied Psycholinguistics, 351, 925–928. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effect in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 391, 458–483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Heuven, W. J. B., Schriefers, H., Dijkstra, T., & Hagoort, P. (2008). Language conflict in the bilingual brain. Cerebral Cortex, 181, 2706–2716. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Von Studnitz, R. E., & Green, D. W. (2002). Interlingual homograph interference in German-English bilinguals: Its modulation and locus of control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 51, 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B. (1998). Language switches in L3 production: Implications for a polyglot speaking model. Applied Linguistics, 191, 295–333. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Lijewska, Agnieszka & Robertus de Louw
2025. Facilitation for non-identical cognates in L3. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 15:5 ► pp. 632 ff. DOI logo
Oberste-Berghaus, Nataliia
2025. German-Ukrainian Cognates: A New Framework for Classification and Language Learning. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS 38:2 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Otwinowska, Agnieszka, Breno B. Silva, Agata Ambroziak, Olga Broniś, Aleksandra Janczarska & Małgorzata Foryś-Nogala
2025. Adapting the Vocabulary Knowledge Scale to measure L3 lexical knowledge. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Otwinowska, Agnieszka, Breno B. Silva, Olga Broniś, Agata Ambroziak, Aleksandra Janczarska, Borys Jastrzębski & Małgorzata Foryś-Nogala
2025. Learning L2-L3 cognates and L1-L2-L3 cognates in class: A longitudinal experiment in raising awareness of L2-L3 similarity. Lingua 328 ► pp. 104057 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Xiaoyu & Youngah Do
2025. Preference for Distinct Variants in Learning Sound Correspondences During Dialect Acquisition. Language and Speech 68:3 ► pp. 534 ff. DOI logo
Engemann, Helen & Stefanie Radetzky
2024. Cognate Facilitation in Child Third Language Learners in a Multilingual Setting. Languages 9:10 ► pp. 310 ff. DOI logo
Hao, Chen & Yang Ming
2024. Comparative Analysis of Cognates in Two Datasets in Spanish Teaching in China. Cuadernos de Lingüística Hispánica :43 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Otwinowska, Agnieszka
2024. Cross-linguistic influence and language co-activation in acquiring L3 words: What empirical evidence do we have so far?. Second Language Research 40:3 ► pp. 765 ff. DOI logo
Lijewska, Agnieszka
2023. The influence of semantic bias on triple non-identical cognates during reading: Evidence from trilinguals’ eye movements. Second Language Research 39:4 ► pp. 1235 ff. DOI logo
García, Omar, Anna B. Cieślicka & Roberto R. Heredia
2020. Online Ambiguity Resolution in Bilingual Lexical Access. In Bilingual Lexical Ambiguity Resolution, ► pp. 184 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue