Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 10:2 (2020) ► pp.290–308

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Code-blending with depicting signs

ORCiD logo with link | Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
ORCiD logo with link | Harvard University
ORCiD logo with link | University of Connecticut
ORCiD logo with link | San Diego State University
Published online: 5 June 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.17043.qua
Abstract
Bimodal bilinguals sometimes use code-blending, simultaneous production of (parts of) an utterance in both speech and sign. We ask what spoken language material is blended with entity and handling depicting signs (DS), representations of action that combine discrete components with iconic depictions of aspects of a referenced event in a gradient, analog manner. We test a semantic approach that DS may involve a demonstration, involving a predicate which obligatorily includes a modificational demonstrational component, and adopt a syntactic analysis which crucially distinguishes between entity and handling DS. Given the model of bilingualism we use, we expect both DS can be produced with speech that occurs in the verbal structure, along with vocal gestures, but speech that includes a subject is only expected to be blended with handling DS, not entity. The data we report from three Codas, native bimodal bilinguals, from the United States and one from Brazil conform with this prediction.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background and predictions
    • 2.1Code-blending
    • 2.2Depicting signs
    • 2.3Code-blended structures with DS
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Data collection
    • 3.3Data coding
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Verb production
    • 4.2Where does code-blending occur?
    • 4.3Grammatical categories blended with DS
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (33)
References
Benedicto, E., & Brentari, D. (2004). Where did all the arguments go? Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 221, 743–810. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berent, G. P. (2013). Sign language–spoken language bilingualism and the derivation of bimodally mixed sentences. In T. K. Bhatia & W. C. Ritchie (Eds.), The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism, Second Edition (pp. 351–374). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bishop, M. (2010). Happen can’t hear: An analysis of code-blends in hearing, native signers of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 11(2), 205–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branchini, C. & Donati, C. (2016). Assessing lexicalism through bimodal eyes. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 1(1), 48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, K. (2015). Quotation, demonstration, and iconicity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 381, 477–520. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeMatteo, A. (1977). Visual Imagery and Visual Analogues in American Sign Language. In L. Friedman (Ed.), On The Other Hand. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donati, C. & Branchini, C. (2013). Challenging linearization: Simultaneous mixing in the production of bimodal bilinguals. In T. Biberauer & I. Roberts (Eds.), Challenges to linearization (pp. 93–128). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, K. (Ed.) (2003). Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Signed Languages. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., & Herzig, M. (2003). Categorical versus gradient properties of classifier constructions in ASL. In K. Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Signed Languages (pp. 221–246). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., Borinstein, H. B., Thompson, R. & Gollan, T. H. (2008). Bimodal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(1), 43–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., McCullough, S., Mehta, S. H., Ponto, L. B., & Grabowski, T. J. (2013). The biology of linguistic expression impacts neural correlates for spatial language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(4), 517–533. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., Petrich, J. A. F., & Gollan, T. H. (2012). Bilingual processing of ASL-English code-blends: The consequences of accessing two lexical representations simultaneously. Journal of Memory and Language, 671, 199–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., Giezen, M. R., & Gollan, T. H. (2016). Psycholinguistic, cognitive, and neural implications of bimodal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(2), 223–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., Borinstein, H. B. & Thompson, R. (2005). Bimodal bilingualism: Code-blending between spoken English and American Sign Language. In J. Cohen, K. McAlister, K. Rolstad & J. MacSwan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, E. (1993). Space in Danish Sign Language, Signum Verlag, Hamburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hochgesang, Julie A., Crasborn, Onno, & Lillo-Martin, Diane. (2018). ASL Signbank. New Haven, CT: Haskins Lab, Yale University. [URL]
Klima, E. S., & Bellugi, U. (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koulidobrova, E. (2012). When the quiet surfaces: Transfer of Argument Omission in the Speech of ASL-English Bilinguals. PhD Dissertation. University of Connecticut. Storrs.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017b). Elide me bare: Null arguments in American Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 351, 397–446. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D., Quadros, R. M. de, Koulidobrova, E., & Pichler, D. C. (2010). Bimodal bilingual cross-language influence in unexpected domains. In J. Costa, A. Castro, M. Lobo & F. Pratas (Eds.), Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2009 (pp. 264–275). Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D., Quadros, R. M. de & Chen Pichler, D. (2016). The development of bimodal bilingualism: Implications for linguistic theory. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6(6), 719–755. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonald, B. (1982). Aspects of the American Sign Language Predicate System. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, SUNY Buffalo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quadros, R. M. de (2017). Língua de herança: Língua Brasileira de Sinais. Porto Alegre: Editora Penso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Bimodal bilingual heritage signers: A balancing act of languages and modalities. Sign Language Studies, 18(3), 355–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quadros, R. M. de, Lillo-Martin, D. & Emmorey, K. (2016a). As línguas de bilíngues bimodais. Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto, 111, 139–160.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quadros, R. M. de, Lillo-Martin, D. & Chen Pichler, D. (2016b). Bimodal Bilingualism: Sign Language and Spoken Language. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies in Language: Research, Policy, and Practice (pp. 181–196). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schembri, A., Jones, C., & Burnham, D. (2005). Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: Evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners’ gestures without speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(3), 272–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sehyr, Z. S., & Cormier, K. (2016). Perceptual categorization of handling handshapes in British Sign Language. Language and Cognition, 81, 501–532. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Supalla, T. (1982). Structure and Acquisition of Verbs of Motion and Location in American Sign Language. PhD Dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zucchi, S., Cecchetto, C., & Geraci, C. (2012). Event descriptions and classifier predicates in sign languages. Presentation at FEAST in Venice, 21 June 2011.
Zwitserlood, I. (2012). Classifiers. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach, & B. Woll (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (pp. 158–185). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Chen Pichler, Deborah & Diane Lillo-Martin
2025. Translanguaging in sign language communities. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 15:1 ► pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
Kimmelman, Vadim & Evgeniia Khristoforova
2025. Classifier handshape choice in Russian Sign Language and Sign Language of the Netherlands. Open Linguistics 11:1 DOI logo
Lillo-Martin, Diane, Deanna Gagne, Melissa Avino, Jonathan D. Bobaljik, Susanne Wurmbrand, Ronice Müller de Quadros & Grace Keller
2025. Linguistic characteristics of bimodal bilingual code-blending: Evidence from acceptability judgments. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Giustolisi, Beatrice, Angélique Jaber, Chiara Branchini, Carlo Geraci & Caterina Donati
2024. Processing code-blending beyond the lexical level: evidence for a double syntactic derivation?. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 27:5 ► pp. 927 ff. DOI logo
Lillo-Martin, Diane, Shengyun Gu, L. Viola Kozak & Deborah Chen Pichler
2024. The Phonology of Bimodal Bilinguals. In The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Phonetics and Phonology, ► pp. 607 ff. DOI logo
Müller de Quadros, Ronice, Diane Lillo-Martin & Marilyn Mafra Klamt
2023. Blending Libras and Portuguese: Acceptability Variables. In Formal Approaches to Languages of South America, ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Bragg, Danielle, Naomi Caselli, Julie A. Hochgesang, Matt Huenerfauth, Leah Katz-Hernandez, Oscar Koller, Raja Kushalnagar, Christian Vogler & Richard E. Ladner
2021. The FATE Landscape of Sign Language AI Datasets. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 14:2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue