Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 10:6 (2020) ► pp.873–901

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Language bias and proficiency effects on cross-language activation

A comprehension and production comparison

 | Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
Published online: 10 December 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.17023.mar
Abstract
Recent research proposes that language bias and proficiency modulate cross-language activation in comprehension and production, but it is unclear how they operate and whether they interact. This study investigates whether stress differences between Spanish-English cognates (material, final-syllable stress in Spanish) affect how native-English second-language-Spanish bilinguals recognize Spanish words (materia “subject/matter,” second-syllable stress in Spanish). In a Spanish-English eye-tracking experiment (and parallel production task), participants heard/produced trisyllabic Spanish targets with second-syllable stress (materia) and saw four orthographic words, including the target and a Spanish-English cognate competitor. Cross-language activation was examined by manipulating the stress of the cognate in English. In comprehension, English cognates with the same stress as the Spanish target (materia vs material) were predicted to cause more cross-language interference than English cognates with a different stress (litera “bunk bed,” vs literal), but the reverse pattern was expected in production. Participants were assigned to a Spanish-bias condition (20% of English (filler) items), or an English-bias condition (65% of English (filler) items). Results indicate that English cognates with the same stress as the Spanish target interfered with the recognition of the Spanish target only in the English-bias condition (but facilitated its production), while increasing Spanish proficiency helped reduce this cross-linguistic interference.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Experiment 1: Comprehension
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Materials
    • 2.3Procedure
    • 2.4Data analysis
    • 2.5Results
    • 2.6Discussion
  • 3.Experiment 2: Production
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Materials
    • 3.3Procedure
    • 3.4Data analysis
    • 3.5Results
    • 3.6Discussion
  • 4.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (68)
References
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Processing (Vol. 21). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 . Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2011). Bilingualism influences inhibitory control in auditory comprehension. Cognition, 118(2), 245–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2010). Praat: doing phonetics by computers. Retrieved from [URL]
Brown, J. D. (1980). Relative merits of four methods for scoring cloze tests. Modern Language Journal, 641, 311–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Canseco-Gonzalez, E., Brehm, L., Brick, C. A., Brown-Schmidt, S., Fischer, K., & Wagner, K. (2010). Carpet or Cárcel: The effect of age of acquisition and language mode on bilingual lexical access. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(5), 669–705. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chambers, C. G., & Cooke, H. (2009). Lexical competition during second-language listening: Sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon. Cognition, 35(4), 1029–1040.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chee, M. W., Tan, E. W., & Thiel, T. (1999). Mandarin and English single word processing studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 19(8), 3050–3056. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooper, N., Cutler, A., & Wales, R. (2002). Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: evidence from native and non-native listeners. Language and Speech, 45(3), 207–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 491–511. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Ivanova, I. (2006). How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1057–1074. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Desmet, T., & Duyck, W. (2007). Bilingual language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(3), 168–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Desroches, A. S., Newman, R. L., & Joanisse, M. F. (2009). Investigating the time course of spoken word recognition: electrophysiological evidence for the influences of phonological similarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 211, 1893–1906. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T. (2005). Bilingual visual word recognition and lexical access. In B. MacWhinney, J. F. Kroll, & A. M. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches (pp. 179–201).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., & van Hell, J. G. (2003). Testing the Language Mode Hypothesis Using Trilinguals. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6(1), 2–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duchon, A., Perea, M., Sebastián, N., Martí, M. A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). EsPal: one-stop shopping for Spanish word properties. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1246–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duffau, H. (2008). The anatomo-functional connectivity of language revisited. New insights provided by electrostimulation and tractography. Neuropsychologia, 46(4), 927–934. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987). A critical period for learning to pronounce foreign languages? Applied Linguistics, 81, 162–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García-Pentón, L., Pérez Fernández, A., Iturria-Medina, Y., Gillon-Dowens, M., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Anatomical connectivity changes in the bilingual brain. NeuroImage, 841, 495–504. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golestani, N., Alario, F. X., Meriaux, S., Le Bihan, D., Dehaene, S., & Pallier, C. (2006). Syntax production in bilinguals. Neuropsychologia, 44(7), 1029–1040. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., & Ferreira, L.-A. R. (2004). What is a TOT? Cognate and translation effects on tip-of-the-tongue states in Spanish-English and tagalog-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 246–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. C. (2008). More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 787–814. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grainger, J., & Beauvillain, C. (1987). Language blocking and lexical access in bilinguals. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, D. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 67–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1998). The Bilingual Individual. Interpreting, 21, 163–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guo, T., & Peng, D. (2006). Event-related potential evidence for parallel activation of two languages in bilingual speech production. Neuroreport, 17(17), 1757–1760. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hallett, P. E. (1986). Eye movements. In K. R. Boff, L. I. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (p. 10.1–10.112). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanulová, J., Davidson, D. J., & Indefrey, P. (2011). Where does the delay in L2 picture naming come from? Psycholinguistic and neurocognitive evidence on second language word production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(7), 902–934. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huettig, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic, and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 541, 460–482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, G. M., Swainson, R., Cunnington, R., & Jackson, S. R. (2001). ERP correlates of executive control during repeated language switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(2), 169–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeong, H., Sugiura, M., Sassa, Y., Haji, T., Usui, N., Taira, M., … Kawashima, R. (2007). Effect of syntactic similarity on cortical activation during second language processing: A comparison of English and Japanese among native Korean trilinguals. Human Brain Mapping, 28(3), 194–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ju, M., & Luce, P. (2004). Falling on Sensitive Ears: Constraints on Bilingual Lexical Activation. Psychological Science, 15(5), 314–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, D., Watkins, K. E., Zatorre, R. J., & Milner, B. (2006). Word and nonword repetition in bilingual subjects: A PET study. Human Brain Mapping, 27(2), 153–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, B., & Christensen, H. (2016). Tests in linear mixed effects models. Version 2.0.32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lagrou, E., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W. (2013a). Interlingual competition in a spoken sentence context: Evidence from the visual world paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review2, 201, 963–972. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013b). The influence of sentence context and accented speech on lexical access in second-language auditory word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition2, 16(3), 508–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2009). Bilingual lexical access in context: evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 381–390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., Hoshino, N., & Kroll, J. F. (2008). Cross-language lexical processes and inhibitory control. The Mental Lexicon, 3(3), 349–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luce, P. A, & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19(1), 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marian, V., & Spivey, M. (2003). Bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(2), 173–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003a). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(2), 97–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003b). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(2), 97–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken. Cognition, 251, 71–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez-García, M. T., Van Anne, K., Brown, R., & Tremblay, A. (n.d.). English and Spanish Listeners’ Use of “Positive” Stress cues in Spanish Word Recognition.
Martino, J., Brogna, C., Robles, S. G., Vergani, F., & Duffau, H. (2010). Anatomic dissection of the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus revisited in the lights of brain stimulation data. Cortex, 46(5), 691–699. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McClelland, J. L., Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE Model of Speech Perception. Cognitive Psychology, 181, 1–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meuter, R. F. I., & Allport, A. (1999). Bilingual Language Switching in Naming : Asymmetrical Costs of Language Selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 401, 25–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirman, D., Dixon, J. A., & Magnuson, J. S. (2008). Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 475–494. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mishra, R. K., & Singh, N. (2016). The influence of second language proficiency on bilingual parallel language activation in Hindi – English bilinguals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 59111(April), 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohades, S. G., Struys, E., Van Schuerbeek, P., Mondt, K., Van De Craen, P., & Luypaert, R. (2012). DTI reveals structural differences in white matter tracts between bilingual and monolingual children. Brain Research, 14351, 72–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Monsell, S., Yeung, N., & Azuma, R. (2000). Reconfiguration of task-set: Is it easier to switch to the weaker task? Psychological Research, 631, 250–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perani, D., Abutalebi, J., Paulesu, E., Brambati, S., Scifo, P., Cappa, S. F., & Fazio, F. (2003). The role of age of acquisition and language usage in early, high-proficient bilinguals: An fMRI study during verbal fluency. Human Brain Mapping, 19(3), 170–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sancier, M. L., & Fowler, C. a. (1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 421–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schulpen, B., Dijkstra, T., Schriefers, H. J., & Hasper, M. (2003). Recognition of interlingual homophones in bilingual auditory word recognition. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance (Vol. 291). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. I., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language2, 55(2), 197–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., & Bienkowski, M. (1982). Automatic Access of the Meanings of Ambiguous Words in Context : Some Limitations of Knowledge-Based Processing. Cognitive Psychology, 141, 489–537. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverberg, S., & Samuel, A. G. (2004). The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(3), 381–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soares, C., & Grosjean, F. (1984). Bilinguals in a monolingual and a bilingual speech mode: the effect on lexical access. Memory & Cognition, 12(4), 380–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soto-Faraco, S., Sebastián-Galles, N., & Cutler, A. (2001). Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 451, 412–432. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spivey, M. J., & Marian, V. (1999). Cross Talk Between Native and Second Languages: Partial Activation of an Irrelevant Lexicon. Psychological Science, 10(3), 281–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliaferri, B. (2005). Paradigm. Perception Research Systems, Inc. Retrieved from [URL]
Titone, D., Libben, M., Mercier, J., Whitford, V., & Pivneva, I. (2011). Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1–L2 intermixing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1412–1431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2008). Is second language lexical access prosodically constrained? Processing of word stress by French Canadian second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 291, 553–584. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tremblay, A., & Ransijn, J. (2015). Model selection and post-hoc analysis for (G)LMER Models. R software package.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(1), 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, A., Melinger, A., Lara Tapia, L. (2007). The mapping of phonetic information to lexical representation in Spanish: Evidence from eye movements. In J. Trouvain & W. J. Barry (Eds.) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2007). Dudweiler: Pirrot (pp. 1941–1944).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lijewska, Agnieszka & Robertus de Louw
2025. Facilitation for non-identical cognates in L3. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 15:5 ► pp. 632 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue