Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 9:2 (2019) ► pp.163–201

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

How subject animacy constrains motion event descriptions

Evidence from sequential and simultaneous bilinguals in French and English

ORCiD logo with link | University of Portsmouth
 | National University of Ireland, Galway
Published online: 9 August 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16023.ber
Abstract
Research has indicated that during sentence processing, French native speakers predominantly rely upon lexico-semantic cues (i.e., animacy) while native speakers of English rely upon syntactic cues (i.e., word order). The present study examined sentence production in L1 French/L2 English and L1 English/L2 French sequential bilinguals. Participants used animate and inanimate entities as sentence subjects while describing motion events represented by static pictures. To test a gradual change in animacy cue weighting in second-language sequential bilinguals with different proficiency levels were included. Sentence production of sequential bilinguals was compared against that of simultaneous bilinguals. The results indicated an overall preference for the use of animate subjects for both languages at all proficiency levels. The effect of animacy was stronger for English L2 than French L2 while it did not differ between languages in simultaneous bilinguals. Evidence for potential change in the animacy-cue weighting was only observed for English L2.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Animacy, L2 and bilingualism
  • 3.Motion events and animacy in bilinguals
  • 4.Aim and design of the study
  • 5.Method
    • 5.1Participants
    • 5.2Task
    • 5.3Procedure
    • 5.4Analysis
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Quantitative analysis
      • Sequential bilinguals
      • Simultaneous bilinguals
    • 6.2Qualitative analysis
      • Sequential bilinguals
      • Simultaneous bilinguals
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (93)
References
Abutalebi, J., Cappa, S., & Perani, D. (2009). What can functional neuroimaging tell us about the bilingual brain? In J. Kroll, & A. M. B. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism (pp. 479–515). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Achard, M. (2002). Causation, constructions, and language ecology: An example from French. In M. Shibatani (Ed.), The Grammar of Causation and Causative Manipulation (pp. 127–156). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21(3), 435–483. Available from Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A., & Schäfer, F. (2006). Instrument subjects are agents or causers. In D. Baumer, D. Montero, & M. Scanlon (Eds.), 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp 44–48). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Available from [URL]
Altmann, L. J. P., & Kemper, S. (2006). Age differences in sensitivity to animacy and order of activation in sentence production. Language and Cognitive Process, 21(1–3), 322–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antonijević, S., & Berthaud, S. (2009). Verbs of motion and sentence production in second language. Proceedings of Fechner Day, 25(1), 487–492.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia, Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barac, R., & Bialystok, E. (2012). Bilingual effects on cognitive and linguistic development: Role of language, cultural background, and education. Child Development, 83(2), 413–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In E. Wanner, & L. R. Gleitman (Eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art (pp. 173–218). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, E., et al. (1984). A cross-linguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. Child Development, 55(2), 341–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S. W. (2010). The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of linguistics, 46(02), 331–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berthaud, S. and Antonijević, S. (2012). L2 acquisition of verbal constructions: expressing motion in L2 French and English. In M. Bouveret and D. Legallois (Eds.), French constructions in discourse and development (pp. 155–174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual. Child Development, 70(3), 636–644. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Feng, X. (2011). Language proficiency and its implications for monolingual and bilingual children. In A. Y. Durgunoğlu, & C. Goldenberg (Eds.), Language and Literacy Development in Bilingual Settings (pp. 121–138). New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, J., Loebell, H., & Morey, R. (1992). From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic fcleft. Psychological Review, 99(1), 150–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1973). Early syntactic development: A cross-linguistic study with special reference to Finnish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, H., Pickering, M., & Tanaka, M. (2008). Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua, 118(2), 172–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1970). Psycholinguistics: Selected Papers by Roger Brown. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, R., Cazden, C., & Bellugi, U. (1973). The child’s grammar from I to III. In C. A. Ferguson, & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies of Child Language Development (pp. 295–333). New York: Holt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bylund, E., & Athanasopoulos, P. (2015). Introduction: Cognition, motion events, and SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 1–13. Available from Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, S. (2013). Translation into the second language (2nd ed.). New York:Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chapman, R., & Miller, J. (1975). Word order in early two and three word utterances: Does production precede comprehension? Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 181, 346–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1973). What’s in a word? On the child’s acquisition of semantics in his first language. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 65–110). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H., & Begun, J. (1971). Semantics of sentence subjects. Language and Speech, 14(1), 34–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1989). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL quarterly, 33(2), 185–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, A., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Is the lexical selection in bilingual speech production language-specific? Further evidence from Spanish-English and English-Spanish bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2(3), 231–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2014). How does the bilingual experience sculpt the brain? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(5), 336–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruse, D. (1973). Some thoughts on agentivity. Journal of Linguistics, 9(1), 11–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Villiers, P., & de Villiers, J. (1974). On this, that and the other: Non-egocentrism in very young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18(3), 438–447. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devescovi, A., D’Amico, S., & Gentille, P. (1999). The development of sentence comprehension in Italian: A reaction time study. First Language, 19(56), 129–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dong, Y., Gui, S., & Macwhinney, B. (2005). Shared and separate meanings in the bilingual mental lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 8(3), 221–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 164–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferreira, F. (1994). Choice of passive voice is affected by verb type and animacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(6), 715–736. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Folli, R., & Harley, H. (2005). Flavours of v: Consuming results in Italian and English. In P. Kempchinsky, & R. Slabakova (Eds.), Aspectual Enquiries (pp. 95–120). Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Causation, obligation and argument structure: On the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(2), 197–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Teleology and animacy in external arguments. Lingua, 118(2), 190–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S. (1987). The resolution of conflicts among competing systems: A bidirectional perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8(4), 329–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gennari, S., Mirkovic, J., & MacDonald, M. (2012). Animacy and competition in relative clause production: A cross-linguistic investigation. Cognitive Psychology, 65(2), 141–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, D. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimm, S. (2007). The bounds of subjecthood: Evidence from instruments. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 33(1), 178–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1989). Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language, 36(1), 3–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosjean, F., & Li, P. (2012). The Psycholinguistics of Bilingualism. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatim, B. (2014). Teaching and Researching Translation (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hernandez, A., & Bates, E., & Avila, L. (1996). Processing across the language boundary: a cross-modal priming study of Spanish-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22(4), 846–864.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hervey, S. G., & Higgins, I. (2002). Thinking French translation: a course in translation method: French to English (2nd ed). Psychology Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickmann, M. (2007). Static and dynamic location in French: Developmental and cross-linguistic perspectives. In M. Aurnague, M. Hickmann, & L. Vieu (Eds.), The Categorization of Spatial Entities in Language and Cognition (pp. 205–231). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickmann, M., & Hendriks, H. (2010). Typological constraints on the acquisition of spatial language in French and English. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(2), 189–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hurford, J. (1994). Grammar: A Student’s Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2003). What translation tells us about motion: A contrastive study of typologically different languages. IJES, International Journal of English Studies, 3(2), 151–175.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Itagaki, N., & Prideaux, G. (1985). Nominal properties as determinants of subject selection. Lingua, 66(23), 125–149.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kail, M. (1999). Linguistic variations and cognitive constraints in the processing and the acquisition of language. In C. Fuchs, & S. Robert (Eds.), Language Diversity and Cognitive Representations (pp. 179–195). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kail, M., & Charvillat, A. (1986). Linguistic cues in sentence processing in French children and adults from a cross-linguistic perspective. Advances in Psychology, 391, 349–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroll, J., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interferences in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connection between bilingual memory representation. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, H., Bates, E., & Li, P. (1992). Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13(4), 451–484. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In J. F. Kroll, & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 49–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1989). The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonald, J., Bock, J., & Kelly, M. (1993). Word and world order: semantic, phonological and metrical determinants of serial position. Cognitive Psychology, 25(2), 188–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonald, J., & Heilenman, L. (1991). Determinants of cue strength in adult first and second language speakers of French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12(3), 313–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morett, L., & MacWhinney, B. (2013). Syntactic transfer in English-speaking Spanish learners 132–151.. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 132–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computer, 36(3), 516–524. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur Internet: LEXIQUE. L’Année Psychologique, 1011, 447–462. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochsenbauer, A., & Engemann, H. (2011). The impact of typological factors in monolingual and bilingual first language acquisition: Caused motion expressions in English and French. Language, Interaction and Acquisition/Langage, Interaction et Acquisition, 2(1), 101–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2009). Conceptual representation in the bilingual lexicon and second language vocabulary learning. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), The Bilingual Mental Lexicon: Interdisciplinary Approaches (pp. 125–160). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L. (2005). When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events. Cognition, 98(3), 75–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pearson, J., Stevenson, R., & Poesio, M. (2001). The effects of animacy, thematic role, and surface position on the focusing of entities in discourse. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pham, G., & Ebert, K. D. (2016). A longitudinal analysis of sentence interpretation in bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(2), 461–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pham, G., & Kohnert, K. (2010). Sentence interpretation by typically developing Vietnamese – English bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(3), 507–529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pourcel, S., & Kopecka, A. (2005). Motion expression in French: Typological diversity. Durham & Newcastle working papers in linguistics, 111, 139–153.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prat Sala, M. (1997). The Production of Different Word Orders: A Psycholinguistic and Developmental Approach. PhD Dissertation. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. Available from [URL]
Rakison, D. H., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2001). Developmental origin of the animate – inanimate distinction. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 209–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. (2008). Conclusion: Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition and L2 Instruction – Issues for Research. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 489–545). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenbach, A. (2005). Animacy versus weight as determinants of grammatical variation in English. Language, 81(3), 613–644. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sasaki, Y. (1991). English and Japanese interlanguage comprehension strategies – An analysis based on the Competition Model. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12(1), 47–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scholfield, P. (1995). Quantifying Language: A Researcher’s Guide to Gathering Language Data and Reducing it to Figures. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1968). Imitation and grammatical development in children. In N. Endler, S. Boulter, & H. Osser (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Developmental Psychology (pp. 437–443). New York: Holt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical Constructions. Their From and Meaning (pp. 195–219). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–258). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (2005). Relating narrative events in translation. In D. Ravid & H. B. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development (pp. 115–129). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stosic, D., & Sarda, L. (2009). The many ways to be located: the expression of fictive motion in French and Serbian. In M. B. Vukanović, & L. G. Grmuša (Eds.), Space and Time in Language and Literature (pp. 39–60). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Su, I. -R. (2001). Transfer of sentence processing strategies: A comparison of L2 learners of Chinese and English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(1), 83–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol. 1 & 21). MIT press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tremoulet, P. D., & Feldman, J. (2000). Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception, 29(8), 943–951. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Nice, K. & Dietrich, R. (2003). Task sensitivity of animacy effects: from German picture descpritions. Linguistics, 41(5), 825–849.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, J., & Xu, C. (2015). Cue Competition between Animacy and Word Order: Acquisition of Chinese Notional Passives by L2 Learners. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 5(2), 213–224. Available from Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolff, P., Geon, G., & Li, Y. (2009). Causers in English, Korean and Chinese and the individuation of events. Language and Cognition, 1(2), 165–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolff, P., Jeon, G., Klettle, B., & Li, Y. (2010). Force creation and possible causers across languages. In B. Malt, P. Wolff (Eds.), Words and the Mind: How Words Capture Human Experience (pp. 93–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woods, A., Fletcher, P., & Hughes, A. (1986). Statistics in Language Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wust, V. (2010). L2 French learners’ processing of object clitics: Data from the classroom. L2 Journal, 2(1), 45–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Batardière, Marie-Thérèse, Sarah Berthaud, Bronagh Ćatibušić & Colin J. Flynn
2023. Language teaching and learning in Ireland: 2012–2021. Language Teaching 56:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue