Editorial published In: Representation and Processing in Bilingual Morphology
Edited by Jennifer R. Austin
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:1] 2019
► pp. 1–5
Editorial
Representation and processing in bilingual morphology
This article is available free of charge.
Published online: 1 March 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.00023.aus
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.00023.aus
References (23)
Baker, M. (1985). The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry, 16(3), 373–415.
Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form (Vol. 91). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar. Boston: Ginn, 184–221.
Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., & Silva, R. (2010). Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning, 60(1), 21–43.
De Grauwe, S., Lemhöfer, K., Willems, R. M., & Schriefers, H. (2014). L2 speakers decompose morphologically complex verbs: fMRI evidence from priming of transparent derived verbs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 802.
Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(4), 344–358.
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 111–176.
Gor, K., Chrabaszcz, A., & Cook, S. V. (2019). A case for agreement: Processing of case inflection by early and late learners. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9(1).
Harley, H. & Ritter, E. (2002). Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3), 482–526.
Lee, E. & Lardiere, D. (2019). Feature reassembly in the acquisition of plural marking by Korean and Indonesian bilinguals: A bidirectional study. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9(1).
Liceras, J. M. & Klassen, R. (2019). Compounding and derivation: On the ‘promiscuity’ of derivational affixes. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9(1).
Mueller Gathercole, V. (2007). Miami and North Wales, so far and yet so near: A constructivist account of morphosyntactic development in bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(3), 224–247.
Montrul, S. (2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 125–142.
Nicoladis, E., Palmer, A., & Marentette, P. (2007). The role of type and token frequency in using past tense morphemes correctly. Developmental Science, 10(2), 237–254.
Nicoladis, E., Song, J., & Marentette, P. (2012). Do young bilinguals acquire past tense morphology like monolinguals, only later? Evidence from French-English and Chinese-English bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(3), 457–479.
Paradis, J., Nicoladis, E., Crago, M., & Genesee, F. (2011). Bilingual children’s acquisition of the past tense: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language, 38(3), 554–578.
Silva, R., & Clahsen, H. (2008). Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 245–260.
Sagarra, N., Sánchez, L., & Bel, A. (2019). Processing DOM in relative clauses: Salience and optionality in early and late bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(1).
