Reply published In: Epistemological issue with keynote article “A Formalist Perspective on Language Acquisition” by Charles Yang
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8:6] 2018
► pp. 797–809
Reply
Some consequences of the Tolerance Principle
Published online: 26 November 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.00022.yan
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.00022.yan
Article outline
- 1.Clarifications and corrections
- 2.Children, adults, and vocabularies
- 3.Learnability and the theory of grammar
- 4.Conclusion
- Note
References
References (64)
Ambridge, B. & Lieven, E. V. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Anderssen, M., Bentzen, K., & Rodina, Y. (2012). Topicality and complexity in the acquisition of norwegian object shift. Language Acquisition, 19(1), 39–72.
Anderwald, L. (2013). Natural language change or prescriptive influence?: Throve, dove, pled, drug and snuck in 19th-century American English. English World-Wide, 34(2), 146–176.
Armstrong, S. L., Gleitman, L. R., & Gleitman, H. (1983). What some concepts might not be. Cognition, 13(3), 263–308.
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459.
Biberauer, T. (2018). Less is More: On the Tolerance Principle as a manifestation of Maximize Minimal Means. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 707–711.
Boyd, J. K. & Goldberg, A. E. (2011). Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production. Language, 87(1), 55–83.
Brannon, E. M., Wusthoff, C. J., Gallistel, C., & Gibbon, J. (2001). Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: Evidence for a linear subjective number scale. Psychological Science, 12(3), 238–243.
Ceolin, A. (2018). Explaining cross-linguistic differences in article omission through an acquisition model. In Bertolini, A. B. & Kaplan, M. G., (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 100–113, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Derks, P. L. & Paclisanu, M. I. (1967). Simple strategies in binary prediction by children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(2), 278.
De Cat, C. (2018). Evaluating Yang’s algorithms: An outline. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 712–716.
Dimroth, C. (2018). Input and the acquisition of productive grammatical knowledge: Vocabulary size as missing link? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 722–726.
Domínguez, L. & González Alonso, J. (2018). What is the role of L1 representations in a grammar-input model of L2 acquisition? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 717–721.
Fruchter, J. & Marantz, A. (2015). Decomposition, lookup, and recombination: MEG evidence for the Full Decomposition model of complex visual word recognition. Brain and Language, 1431, 81–96.
Gallistel, C. R. & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44(1–2), 43–74.
Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and weber’s law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84(3), 279.
Gleitman, L. R., Cassidy, K., Nappa, R., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2005). Hard words. Language Learning and Development, 1(1), 23–64.
Goldberg, A. (2018). The sufficiency principle hyperinflates the price of productivity. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 727–732.
Gries, S. Th. (2018). Mechanistic formal approaches to language acquisition: Yes, but at the right level(s) of resolution. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 733–737.
Hart, B. & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H Brookes Publishing, Baltimore, MD.
Hudson Kam, C. L. & Newport, E. L. (2005). Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development, 1(2), 151–195.
Jarmulowicz, L. (2002). English derivational suffix frequency and children’s stress judgements. Brain and Language, 81(1–3), 192–204.
Jäschke, T. & Plag, I. (2016). The dative alternation in German-English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 381, 485–521.
Kapatsinski, V. (2018). On the intolerance of the Tolerance Principle. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 738–742.
Lidz, J. & Perkins, L. (2018). The importance of input representations. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 743–748.
Marchman, V. A., Fernald, A., & Hurtado, N. (2010). How vocabulary size in two languages relates to efficiency in spoken word recognition by young spanish-english bilinguals. Journal of Child Language, 37(4), 817–840.
Montrul, S. (2018). Learning a Second Language Takes More than Math. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 749–752.
Paradis, J. (2018). Language-level input factors are not enough to explain child bilingual acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 753–757.
Pine, J. M., Freudenthal, D., Krajewski, G., & Gobet, F. (2013). Do young children have adultlike syntactic categories? Zipf’s law and the case of the determiner. Cognition, 127(3), 345–360.
Regel, S., Opitz, A., Müller, G., & Friederici, A. D. (2015). The past tense debate revisited: Electrophysiological evidence for subregularities of irregular verb inflection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(9), 1870–1885.
Roeper, T. (2018). Grammar acquisition and grammar choice in the variationist model. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 758–763.
Rothman, J. & Chomsky, N. (2018). Towards eliminating arbitrary stipulations related to parameters: Linguistic innateness and the variational model. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 764–769.
Rowland, C. (2018). The principles of scientific inquiry. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 770–775.
Schuler, K. (2017). The acquisition of productive rules in child and adult language learners. PhD thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.
Schütze, C. T. (2005). Thinking about what we are asking speakers to do. In Kepser, S. & Reis, M., (eds.), Linguistic evidence: Empirical, theoretical, and computational perspectives, pages 457–485. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
Slabakova, R. (2018). Back to our roots. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 776–780.
Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory-scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 57(4), 421–457.
Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1998). The particulate origins of language generativity: from syllable to gesture. In Hurford, J., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Knight, C., (eds.), Approaches to the evolution of language, pages 202–221. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Svenonius, P. (2018). Learning rules versus learning items. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 781–786.
Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A(4), 745–765.
Trueswell, J. C., Lin, Y., Armstrong, B., Cartmill, E. A., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Gleitman, L. R. (2016). Perceiving referential intent: Dynamics of reference in natural parent-child interactions. Cognition, 1481, 117–135.
Tyler, A. & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(6):649–667.
Weir, M. W. (1964). Developmental changes in problem-solving strategies. Psychological Review, 71(6), 473.
White, L. & Genesee, F. (1996). How native is near-native? the issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12(3), 233–265.
Wittenberg, E. & Jackendoff, R. (2018). Formalist modeling and psychological reality. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 787–791.
(2013a). Ontogeny and phylogeny of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(16), 6324–6327
(2013b). Who’s afraid of George Kingsley Zipf? Or: Do children and chimps have language? Significance, 10(6), 29–34.
(2016). The price of linguistic productivity: How children learn to break rules of language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
(2017). Rage against the machine: Evaluation metrics in the 21st century. Language Acquisition, 24(2), 100–125.
(2018). A user’s guide to the Tolerance Principle. Manuscript. University of Pennsylvania ([URL]).
Yang, C., Crain, S., Berwick, R. C., Chomsky, N., & Bolhuis, J. J. (2017). The growth of language: Universal grammar, experience, and principles of computation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(Part B), 103–119.
Yang, C. & Montrul, S. (2017). Learning datives: The tolerance principle in monolingual and bilingual acquisition. Second Language Research, 33(1), 119–144.
Yusa, N. (2018). Input effects on the development of I-language in L2 acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 792–796.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Wulff, Stefanie, Nick C. Ellis & Jason Rothman
Archibald, John
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
