References (64)
References
Ambridge, B. & Lieven, E. V. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderssen, M., Bentzen, K., & Rodina, Y. (2012). Topicality and complexity in the acquisition of norwegian object shift. Language Acquisition, 19(1), 39–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Armstrong, S. L., Gleitman, L. R., & Gleitman, H. (1983). What some concepts might not be. Cognition, 13(3), 263–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14(2–3), 150–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berwick, R. C. & Chomsky, N. (2016). Why only us: Language and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyd, J. K. & Goldberg, A. E. (2011). Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production. Language, 87(1), 55–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brannon, E. M., Wusthoff, C. J., Gallistel, C., & Gibbon, J. (2001). Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: Evidence for a linear subjective number scale. Psychological Science, 12(3), 238–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ceolin, A. (2018). Explaining cross-linguistic differences in article omission through an acquisition model. In Bertolini, A. B. & Kaplan, M. G., (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 100–113, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1968). Language and mind. Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). The minimalist program. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derks, P. L. & Paclisanu, M. I. (1967). Simple strategies in binary prediction by children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(2), 278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cat, C. (2018). Evaluating Yang’s algorithms: An outline. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 712–716. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Domínguez, L. & González Alonso, J. (2018). What is the role of L1 representations in a grammar-input model of L2 acquisition? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 717–721. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fruchter, J. & Marantz, A. (2015). Decomposition, lookup, and recombination: MEG evidence for the Full Decomposition model of complex visual word recognition. Brain and Language, 1431, 81–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallistel, C. R. & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44(1–2), 43–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and weber’s law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84(3), 279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1(1), 3–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., Cassidy, K., Nappa, R., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2005). Hard words. Language Learning and Development, 1(1), 23–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (2018). The sufficiency principle hyperinflates the price of productivity. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 727–732.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. (2018). Mechanistic formal approaches to language acquisition: Yes, but at the right level(s) of resolution. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 733–737.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, B. & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H Brookes Publishing, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudson Kam, C. L. & Newport, E. L. (2005). Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development, 1(2), 151–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarmulowicz, L. (2002). English derivational suffix frequency and children’s stress judgements. Brain and Language, 81(1–3), 192–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jäschke, T. & Plag, I. (2016). The dative alternation in German-English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 381, 485–521. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kapatsinski, V. (2018). On the intolerance of the Tolerance Principle. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 738–742.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lidz, J. & Perkins, L. (2018). The importance of input representations. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 743–748.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lignos, C. (2013). Modeling words in the mind. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A., Fernald, A., & Hurtado, N. (2010). How vocabulary size in two languages relates to efficiency in spoken word recognition by young spanish-english bilinguals. Journal of Child Language, 37(4), 817–840. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2018). Learning a Second Language Takes More than Math. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 749–752. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pine, J. M., Freudenthal, D., Krajewski, G., & Gobet, F. (2013). Do young children have adultlike syntactic categories? Zipf’s law and the case of the determiner. Cognition, 127(3), 345–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Regel, S., Opitz, A., Müller, G., & Friederici, A. D. (2015). The past tense debate revisited: Electrophysiological evidence for subregularities of irregular verb inflection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(9), 1870–1885. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roeper, T. (2018). Grammar acquisition and grammar choice in the variationist model. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 758–763.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, J. & Chomsky, N. (2018). Towards eliminating arbitrary stipulations related to parameters: Linguistic innateness and the variational model. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 764–769.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowland, C. (2018). The principles of scientific inquiry. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 770–775.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schuler, K. (2017). The acquisition of productive rules in child and adult language learners. PhD thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schütze, C. T. (2005). Thinking about what we are asking speakers to do. In Kepser, S. & Reis, M., (eds.), Linguistic evidence: Empirical, theoretical, and computational perspectives, pages 457–485. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2018). Back to our roots. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 776–780. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory-scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 57(4), 421–457.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1998). The particulate origins of language generativity: from syllable to gesture. In Hurford, J., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Knight, C., (eds.), Approaches to the evolution of language, pages 202–221. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svenonius, P. (2018). Learning rules versus learning items. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 781–786. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A(4), 745–765. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., Lin, Y., Armstrong, B., Cartmill, E. A., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Gleitman, L. R. (2016). Perceiving referential intent: Dynamics of reference in natural parent-child interactions. Cognition, 1481, 117–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, A. & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(6):649–667. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Visser, F. T. (1963). An historical syntax of the English language. Brill Archive.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weir, M. W. (1964). Developmental changes in problem-solving strategies. Psychological Review, 71(6), 473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, L. & Genesee, F. (1996). How native is near-native? the issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12(3), 233–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittenberg, E. & Jackendoff, R. (2018). Formalist modeling and psychological reality. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 787–791. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, F. & Pinker, S. (1995). Weird past tense forms. Journal of Child Language, 22(3), 531–556. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, C. (2002). Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013a). Ontogeny and phylogeny of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(16), 6324–6327 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013b). Who’s afraid of George Kingsley Zipf? Or: Do children and chimps have language? Significance, 10(6), 29–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Negative knowledge from positive evidence. Language, 91(4):938–953. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). The price of linguistic productivity: How children learn to break rules of language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Rage against the machine: Evaluation metrics in the 21st century. Language Acquisition, 24(2), 100–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). A user’s guide to the Tolerance Principle. Manuscript. University of Pennsylvania ([URL]).
Yang, C., Crain, S., Berwick, R. C., Chomsky, N., & Bolhuis, J. J. (2017). The growth of language: Universal grammar, experience, and principles of computation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(Part B), 103–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, C. & Montrul, S. (2017). Learning datives: The tolerance principle in monolingual and bilingual acquisition. Second Language Research, 33(1), 119–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, C. & Valian, V. (2018). Determiners and grammars. Submitted.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yusa, N. (2018). Input effects on the development of I-language in L2 acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 792–796. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Wulff, Stefanie, Nick C. Ellis & Jason Rothman
2025. Dichotomies as points of departure: A response to Truscott and Sharwood Smith (2024). Second Language Research DOI logo
Archibald, John
2022. Segmental and Prosodic Evidence for Property-by-Property Transfer in L3 English in Northern Africa. Languages 7:1  pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Toni, Andressa
2022. ‘Ota bruxa?’. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos 64  pp. e022025 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue