Commentary published In: Epistemological issue with keynote article “The relevance of first language attrition to theories of bilingual development” by Monika S. Schmid and Barbara Köpke
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7:6] 2017
► pp. 682–685
Commentary
Interpreting age effects in language acquisition and attrition
Published online: 1 February 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.00004.byl
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.00004.byl
References (9)
Bylund, E. (2009). Maturational constraints and first language attrition. Language Learning, 59(3), 687–715.
(in press). Age effects in language attrition. In M. S. Schmid & B. Köpke (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language attrition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyltenstam, K., Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N., & Park, H. -S. (2009). Dominant-language replacement: The case of international adoptees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(2), 121–140.
MacWhinney, B. (2012). The logic of the unified model. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 211–227). New York: Routledge.
Norrman, G., & Bylund, E. (2016). The irreversibility of sensitive period effects in language development: evidence from second language acquisition in international adoptees. Developmental Science, 19(3), 513–520.
Polinsky, M. (2006). Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 141, 191–262.
Putnam, M., & Sánchez, L. (2013). What’s so incomplete about incomplete acquisition? A prolegomenon to modeling heritage language grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 31, 478–508.
Schmid, M. S., & Köpke, B. The relevance of language attrition to theories of bilingual development. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Kleemann, Carola & Kristin Nicolaysen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.