Some Comparative Evidence: On the Syntax of “Wh-Scope Marker” Constructions

Horvath, Julia

doi:10.1075/la.37.11hor

In:Wh-Scope Marking
Edited by Uli Lutz, Gereon Müller and Arnim von Stechow
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 37] 2000
► pp. 271–316

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

On the Syntax of “Wh-Scope Marker” Constructions

Some Comparative Evidence

Julia Horvath

Published online: 15 September 2000

https://doi.org/10.1075/la.37.11hor

Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Order by:

Fernández-Soriano, Olga

2021. The structure and interpretation of ‘non-matching’ split interrogatives in Spanish. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2018 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 357], ► pp. 97 ff.

Slavkov, Nikolay

2015. Long-distance wh-movement and long-distance wh-movement avoidance in L2 English: Evidence from French and Bulgarian speakers. Second Language Research 31:2 ► pp. 179 ff.

Lipták, Anikó & Malte Zimmermann

2007. Indirect scope marking again: a case for generalized question formation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25:1

Bruening, Benjamin

2004. Two Types of Wh-Scope Marking in Passamaquoddy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22:2 ► pp. 229 ff.

Lahiri, Utpal

2002. On the proper treatment of “expletive wh ” in Hindi. Lingua 112:7 ► pp. 501 ff.

TOMIZAWA, NAOTO

2002. A Derivational Approach to Interpretation of Wh-Constructions (A. Simpson, Wh-Movement and the Theory of Feature-Checking). ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 19:2 ► pp. 511 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.