Cross-Linguistic Variation In Indirect Dependency: Scope Marking

Dayal, Veneeta

doi:10.1075/la.37.07day

In:Wh-Scope Marking
Edited by Uli Lutz, Gereon Müller and Arnim von Stechow
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 37] 2000
► pp. 157–193

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Scope Marking

Cross-Linguistic Variation In Indirect Dependency

Veneeta Dayal

Published online: 15 September 2000

https://doi.org/10.1075/la.37.07day

Cited by (30)

Cited by 30 other publications

Order by:

Kyuchukov, Hristo, Jill de Villiers, Yanwan Zhu & Iris Zhong

2025. Assessing the acquisition of Romani in Roma children. Language Acquisition 32:2 ► pp. 153 ff.

Li, Haoze

2023. Uniqueness requirements of wh-questions in discourse. Theoretical Linguistics 49:1-2 ► pp. 139 ff.

Li, Haoze

2025. Reference to the dependency in a multiple-wh question. Linguistics and Philosophy 48:2 ► pp. 301 ff.

Eckardt, Regine & George Walkden

2022. A particle-like use of hwæþer Wisdom’s questions in Boethius. In Discourse Particles [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 276], ► pp. 41 ff.

Alok, Deepak

2021. The Morphosyntax of Magahi Addressee Agreement. Syntax 24:3 ► pp. 263 ff.

Fernández-Soriano, Olga

2021. The structure and interpretation of ‘non-matching’ split interrogatives in Spanish. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2018 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 357], ► pp. 97 ff.

Fujiwara, Yoshiki

2021. Wh-Scope Marking in Japanese: Evidence for the Indirect-Dependency Approach. Linguistic Inquiry 52:3 ► pp. 627 ff.

Arkadiev, Peter M.

2020. Syntax in morphological guise: Interrogative verbal morphology in Abaza. Linguistic Typology 24:2 ► pp. 211 ff.

MYCOCK, LOUISE

2020. The intonation of the Q-marking construction: A comparison of Hungarian and Slovenian. Journal of Linguistics 56:2 ► pp. 359 ff.

de Villiers, Jill G., Jessica Kotfila & Madeline Klein

2019. Parsing, pragmatics, and representation. In Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 63], ► pp. 85 ff.

Dayal, Veneeta

2017. Does Hindi-Urdu Have Feature-DrivenWh-Movement to Spec,vP?. Linguistic Inquiry 48:1 ► pp. 159 ff.

Johnson, Meredith & Monica Macaulay

2015. A Monoclausal Analysis of Menominee Wh-Questions. International Journal of American Linguistics 81:3 ► pp. 337 ff.

Slavkov, Nikolay

2015. Long-distance wh-movement and long-distance wh-movement avoidance in L2 English: Evidence from French and Bulgarian speakers. Second Language Research 31:2 ► pp. 179 ff.

Stepanov, Arthur

2012. Voiding Island Effects via Head Movement. Linguistic Inquiry 43:4 ► pp. 680 ff.

Legate, Julie Anne

2011. Warlpiri Wh‐Scope Marking. Syntax 14:2 ► pp. 97 ff.

Oiry, Magda

2011. Acquisition of Long-Distance Questions in French. Language Acquisition 18:3 ► pp. 205 ff.

Roeper, Tom & Jill de Villiers

2011. The Acquisition Path for Wh-Questions. In Handbook of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 41], ► pp. 189 ff.

DE VILLIERS, JILL, THOMAS ROEPER, LINDA BLAND-STEWART & BARBARA PEARSON

2008. Answering hard questions:Wh-movement across dialects and disorder. Applied Psycholinguistics 29:1 ► pp. 67 ff.

Jakubowicz, Celia & Nelleke Strik

2008. Scope-marking Strategies in the Acquisition of Long Distance wh-Questions in French and Dutch. Language and Speech 51:1-2 ► pp. 101 ff.

Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro

2007. Book Review: The Acquisition of Syntax in Romance Languages. First Language 27:4 ► pp. 431 ff.

Lipták, Anikó & Malte Zimmermann

2007. Indirect scope marking again: a case for generalized question formation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25:1

Bayer, Josef

2006. Wh‐in‐Situ. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, ► pp. 376 ff.

Fanselow, Gisbert

2006. PartialWh‐Movement. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, ► pp. 437 ff.

Fanselow, Gisbert

2017. PartialWh‐Movement. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff.

Bruening, Benjamin

2004. Two Types of Wh-Scope Marking in Passamaquoddy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22:2 ► pp. 229 ff.

Han, Chung-hye & Maribel Romero

2004. The Syntax Of Whether/Q... Or Questions: Ellipsis Combined With Movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22:3 ► pp. 527 ff.

Arregi, Karlos

2003. Clausal Pied-Piping. Natural Language Semantics 11:2 ► pp. 115 ff.

Lahiri, Utpal

2002. On the proper treatment of “expletive wh ” in Hindi. Lingua 112:7 ► pp. 501 ff.

TOMIZAWA, NAOTO

2002. A Derivational Approach to Interpretation of Wh-Constructions (A. Simpson, Wh-Movement and the Theory of Feature-Checking). ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 19:2 ► pp. 511 ff.

[no author supplied]

2006. Consolidated References. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, ► pp. 439 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.