Direct vs. Indirect Dependency: Wh-Scope Marking

Beck, Sigrid; Berman, Stephen

doi:10.1075/la.37.02bec

In:Wh-Scope Marking
Edited by Uli Lutz, Gereon Müller and Arnim von Stechow
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 37] 2000
► pp. 17–44

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Wh-Scope Marking

Direct vs. Indirect Dependency

Sigrid Beck

Stephen Berman

Published online: 15 September 2000

https://doi.org/10.1075/la.37.02bec

Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Order by:

Fujiwara, Yoshiki

2021. Wh-Scope Marking in Japanese: Evidence for the Indirect-Dependency Approach. Linguistic Inquiry 52:3 ► pp. 627 ff.

Legate, Julie Anne

2011. Warlpiri Wh‐Scope Marking. Syntax 14:2 ► pp. 97 ff.

Fanselow, Gisbert

2006. PartialWh‐Movement. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, ► pp. 437 ff.

Fanselow, Gisbert

2017. PartialWh‐Movement. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff.

Bruening, Benjamin

2004. Two Types of Wh-Scope Marking in Passamaquoddy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22:2 ► pp. 229 ff.

Lahiri, Utpal

2002. On the proper treatment of “expletive wh ” in Hindi. Lingua 112:7 ► pp. 501 ff.

[no author supplied]

2006. Consolidated References. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, ► pp. 439 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.