In:Adverbs and Particles at the Form-Meaning Interface
Edited by Marco Coniglio, Kalle Müller and Markus Steinbach
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 292] 2026
► pp. 330–351
Discourse relations and temporal adjuncts in written Present-Day English
Published online: 23 March 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.292.15klu
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.292.15klu
Abstract
This paper investigates the use of chains of clause-initial temporal adjuncts as signals of
continuative and contrastive discourse relations in written English discourse. Drawing on 88 examples from the
magazine section of the British National Corpus, the study shows that the linguistic realization of
continuative and contrastive discourse relations varies considerably with regard to (i) the semantics of the temporal
adjuncts, (ii) the presence of additional discourse connectives and (iii) the degree of continuity of the
intra-clausal coherence strands (i.e. referential (dis)continuity, topic (dis)continuity, temporal/aspectual coherence
and lexical coherence). In light of these findings, the present paper argues for conceptualizing continuative and
contrastive discourse relations in terms of a continuum with varying degrees of (dis)continuity, depending on their
linguistic realization.
Keywords: coherence strand, continuity, discourse relation, temporal adjunct
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Adjuncts in English
- 3.Continuative and contrastive discourse relations
- 4.Data and methodology
- 5.Results
- 5.1Quantitative analysis
- 5.2Interaction between variables
- 6.Discussion and conclusion
Notes References Appendix
References (32)
Primary source
Davies, Mark. 2004. British
National Corpus (from Oxford University Press). Available online at [URL]
Secondary sources
Bestgen, Yves & Vonk, Wietske. 2000. Temporal
adverbials as segmentation markers in discourse comprehension. Journal of
Memory and
Language, 42(1): 74–87.
Canestrelli, Anneloes R., Mak, Willem M. & Sanders, Ted J. M. 2013. Causal
connectives in discourse processing: How differences in subjectivity are reflected in eye
movements. Language and Cognitive
Processes, 28(9): 1394–1413.
Claus, Berry. 2012. Processing
narrative texts: Melting frozen
time? In Constraints in Discourse 3: Representing
and Inferring Discourse Structure [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series
223], Anton Benz, Manfred Stede & Peter Kühnlein (eds), 17–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Crible, Ludivine & Demberg, Vera. 2020. When
do we leave discourse relations underspecified? The effect of formality and relation
type. Discours, 26 [Online].
Das, Debopam & Egg, Markus. 2023. Continuity
in discourse relations. Functions of
Language, 30(1): 41–66.
Das, Debopam & Taboada, Maite. 2018. Signalling
of coherence relations, beyond discourse markers. Discourse
Processes, 55(8): 743–770.
Doherty, Monika. 2001. Discourse
relators and the beginnings of sentences in English and German. Languages
in
Contrast, 3(2): 223–251.
. 2003. Parametrized
beginnings of sentences in English and German. Across Languages and
Cultures, 4(1): 19–51.
Fetzer, Anita. 2017. Contrastive
discourse relations in context: Evidence from monologic and dialogic editing
tasks. In Doing Pragmatics Interculturally:
Cognitive, Philosophical, and Sociopragmatic Perspectives [Trends in Linguistics
312], Rachel Giora & Michael Haugh (eds), 269–292. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
. 2018. The
encoding and signalling of discourse relations in argumentative discourse: Evidence across production
formats. In The Construction of Discourse as
Verbal Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series
296], María de los Ángeles Gómez González & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), 13–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fetzer, Anita & Klumm, Matthias. 2023. The
linguistic realization of continuative discourse relations in English discourse: A context-based analysis
across narrative and argumentative genres. Functions of
Language, 30(1): 16–40.
Fetzer, Anita & Speyer, Augustin. 2019. Discourse
relations across genres and contexts: A contrastive analysis of English and German
discourse. Languages in
Contrast, 19(2): 205–231.
Givón, Talmy. 1993a. English
Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction (Volume
1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2020. Coherence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2014. Halliday’s
Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th
edn. London: Routledge.
. 2016. Discourse-structuring
functions of initial adverbials in English and Norwegian news and
fiction. In Genre- and Register-Related Discourse
Features in Contrast [Benjamins Current Topics 87], Marie-Aude Lefer & Svetlana Vogeleer (eds), 73–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hofmockel, Carolin, Fetzer, Anita & Maier, Robert M. 2017. Discourse
relations: Genre-specific degrees of overtness in argumentative and narrative
discourse. Argument &
Computation, 8(2): 131–151.
Klumm, Matthias. 2022. The
signaling of continuative and contrastive discourse relations in English argumentative discourse:
Corpus-based and experimental
perspectives. Discours, 30 [Online].
Klumm, Matthias, Fetzer, Anita & Keizer, Evelien. 2023. Continuative
and contrastive discourse relations across discourse domains: Cognitive and cross-linguistic
approaches. Functions of
Language, 30(1): 4–15.
Mann, William & Thompson, Sandra. 1988. Rhetorical
Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text
organization. Text, 8(3): 243–281.
Murray, John D. 1997. Connectives
and narrative text: The role of continuity. Memory and
Cognition, 25(2): 227–236.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. London: Longman.
Sanders, Ted J. M. & Noordman, Leo G. M. 2000. The
role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text
processing. Discourse
Processes, 29(1): 37–60.
Sanders, Ted J. M., Spooren, Wilbert P. M. & Noordman, Leo G. M. 1992. Toward
a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse
Processes, 15(1): 1–35.
Segal, Erwin M., Duchan, Judith F. & Scott, Paula J. 1991. The
role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: Evidence from adults’ interpretations of simple
stories. Discourse
Processes, 14(1): 27–54.
Taboada, Maite. 2009. Implicit
and explicit coherence relations. In Discourse,
of Course: An Overview of Research in Discourse Studies, Jan Renkema (ed), 125–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
