Cover not available

In:Adverbs and Particles at the Form-Meaning Interface
Edited by Marco Coniglio, Kalle Müller and Markus Steinbach
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 292] 2026
► pp. 236259

References (36)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1991. The grammaticalization of the German modal particles. In Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. 1: Focus on Theoretical and Methological Issues, Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), 331–380. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas & Lascarides, Alex. 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter & Günthner, Susanne. 2005. Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen — ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung? In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans & Sarah De Groodt (eds.), 335–362. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Autenrieth, Tanja. 2002. Heterosemie und Grammatikalisierung bei Modalpartikeln. Eine synchrone und diachrone Studie anhand von eben, halt, echt, einfach, schlicht und glatt [Linguistische Arbeiten 450]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Grammatikalisierung bei Modalpartikeln. Das Beispiel eben. In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans & Sarah De Groodt (eds.), 309–334. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blühdorn, Hardarik. 2017. Diskursmarker. Pragmatische Funktion und syntaktischer Status. In Diskursmarker im Deutschen. Reflexionen und Analysen, Hardarik Blühdorn et al. (eds.), 311–336. Göttingen: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolyanatz, Mariska. 2012. “Ahora, por ejemplo”: ahora as a discursive deictic in Chilean Spanish. Mester, 41(1): 79–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel. 2003. On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26: 511–545. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Binding Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michael. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 145–233. Berlin: Monton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco. 2011. Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln. Ihre Distribution und Lizenzierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen [Studia grammatica 73]. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics, 49(2): 365–390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel. 2013. Expressives and beyond. An introduction to varieties of use-conditional meaning. In Beyond Expressives. Explorations in Use-Conditional Meaning [Current Research in the Semantics Pragmatics-Interface (CRiSPI) 28], Daniel Gutzmann & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), 1–58. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Use-Conditional Meaning. Studies in Multidimensional Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021a. Dimensions of meaning. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics, Daniel Gutzmann et al. (eds.), 589–617. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021b. Semantics vs. pragmatics. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics, Lisa Matthewson et al. (eds.), 2761–2791. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel, Köpping, Jan & Meier, Cécile. 2014. Composition, values, and interpretation. An Introduction to elements of semantic theory. In Approaches to Meaning. Composition, Values, and Interpretation, Daniel Gutzmann, Jan Köpping & Cécile Meier (eds.), 1–21. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2003. Grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imo, Wolfgang. 2010. Das Adverb jetzt zwischen Zeit- und Gesprächsdeixis. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 38: 25–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives. An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In Themes from Kaplan, Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. The meaning of ouch and oops. Explorations in the theory of meaning as use. 2004 version. Ms. Los Angeles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenz, Friedrich. 2007. Reflexivity and temporality in discourse deixis. In Studies in Language Companion Series 86 Anaphors in Text: Cognitive, Formal and Applied Approaches to Anaphoric Reference, Monika Schwarz-Friesel, Manfred Consten & Mareile Knees (eds.), 69–80. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.2004. Deixis. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), 97–121. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maaß, Christiane. 2010. Diskursdeixis im Französischen. Eine korpusbasierte Studie zu Semantik und Pragmatik diskursdeiktischer Verweise. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mann, William C. & Thompson, Sandra A.1988. Rhetorical structure theory. Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 8(3): 243–281.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Lukas. 2025. Expressivity and semantic change. In The Oxford Handbook of Expressivity, Daniel Gutzmann & Katharina Turgay (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 255–275.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Onea, Edgar & Zimmermann, Malte. 2019. Questions in discourse: an overview. In Questions in Discourse. Volume 1: Semantics, Klaus von Heusinger, Malte Zimmermann & Edgar Onea (eds.), 5–117. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rehbock, Helmut. 2009. Ohne jetzt nun gleich aggressiv zu werden: Ein Zeitadverb als Diskursmarker. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 37: 236–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige. 1998/2012. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics & Pragmatics, 5(6): 1–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tichý, Pavel. 1985. Do we need interval semantics?Linguistics and Philosophy, 8(2): 263–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English. An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 65(1): 31–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation. Linguistic Perspectives, Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Constructions in grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Jansa (eds.), 624–647. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turgay, Katharina. 2022. Wie sollen wir das jetzt analysieren? Aspekte zur Bedeutung von jetzt. In Adverbien und Adverbiale. Grenzen und Gliederung einer syntaktischen Kategorie im Deutschen, Pierre-Yves Modicom (ed.), 103–128. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wegener, Heide. 1998. Zur Grammatikalisierung von Modalpartikeln. In Zwischen Grammatik und Lexikon, Irmhild Barz & Günther Öhlschläger (eds.), 37–55. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Thomas Ede. 2012. Context dependency. In Semantics. Vol. 3 [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft (HSK) 33.3], Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), 2360–2407. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue