Cover not available

In:Adverbs and Particles at the Form-Meaning Interface
Edited by Marco Coniglio, Kalle Müller and Markus Steinbach
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 292] 2026
► pp. 176–197

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Adverbs and non-arguments in the Left Periphery

A computational cartographic study

 | Beijing Language and Culture University
Published online: 23 March 2026
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.292.08sam
Abstract
In addition to arguments, adverbs and non-arguments are considered potential candidates to occupy left peripheral positions. Following standard assumptions in syntactic locality, adverbs, non-arguments and arguments elicit distinct effects in terms of intervention locality if moved. Such an asymmetry is not expected if these elements are generated in the syntactic position they are spelt-out. In this study, we employ quantitative and computational methods to compare cartographic models differing in the merge nature and explore, as a diagnostic, the intervention effects (or the lack of intervention effects) predicted by these models. Specifically, we compare the observed counts in large-scale datasets to imputed expected frequencies on the basis of the models under investigation. To reach this goal, we extract grammatical clauses from morpho-syntactically annotated treebanks of Chinese, English, French, German, Hebrew, Italian and Swedish. Our findings reveal cross-linguistic levels of complexity and typological variability, consistent with the predictions of featural Relativized Minimality.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Locality and non-arguments in the Left Periphery
    • 2.1Intervention locality as a diagnostic tool for comparing models
    • 2.2Locality in adverbs
    • 2.3Base-generation or movement? Locality as a diagnostic tool
      • 2.3.1BG-nA: The non argument is base-generated
      • 2.3.2MOVE-nA: The non argument is moved from the IP
  • 3.Quantifying the hypotheses
    • Hypothesis
  • 4.Materials and methods
    • Materials
    • Methods
  • 5.Results and discussion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (80)
References
Abels, Klaus. 2012. The Italian left periphery: A view from locality. Linguistic Inquiry, 43(1): 229–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alfieri, Linda & Tamburini, Fabio. 2016. (almost) automatic conversion of the Venice Italian treebank into the merged Italian dependency treebank format. In The Third Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics — CLiC-IT 2016, S. M. Anna Corazza & Giovanni Semeraro (eds.), 19–23. Naples: Academia University Press. 
Badan, Linda & Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2011. On the syntax of topic and focus in chinese. In Mapping the left periphery, Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds.), 63–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2022. a-Topics in Italian/Romance and the Cartography of Children’s Inventions. Probus, 34(1): 9–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Collins, Chris (eds.). 2020. Smuggling in syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana et al. 2012. Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua, 122(10): 1053–1069. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 2012. Moving verbal chunks in the low functional field. In Functional heads. Volume 7: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Laura Brugé et al. (eds.), 129–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2004. Topic, Focus, and V2: Defining the CP Sublayers. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 52–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, Archna. 2006. Testing cinque’s hierarchy: Adverb placement in hindi. LSO Work. Pap. Linguist, 6: 10–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Bocci, Giuliano & Cruschina, Silvio. 2015. Focus fronting and its implicatures. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, Enoch O. Aboh, Jeannette C. Schaeffer & Petra Sleeman (eds.), 1–20. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borin, Lars, Forsberg, Markus & Lönngren, Lennart. 2008. Saldo 1.0 (Svenskt associationslexikon version 2) — Språkbanken. Göteborg: Göteborg universitet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Catasso, Nicholas. 2022. Looking at the periphery from the suburbs: An information-structurally based taxonomy of hanging topics in german. Linguistik online, 116(4): 11–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Subject and topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 27–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chesi, Cristiano & Canal, Paolo. 2019. Person features and lexical restrictions in Italian clefts. Frontiers in Psychology: 2105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, Joao. et al. 2014. The boy that the chef cooked: Acquisition of PP relatives in European Portuguese and Hebrew. Lingua, 150: 386–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Clercq, Karen & Haegeman, Liliane. 2021. Invariant die and adverbial resumption in the ghent dialect. In Current issues in syntactic cartography: A crosslinguistic perspective, Fuzhen Si & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), 53–110. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Del Río, Carlos. 2016. A hierarquia dos advérbios no catalão. Rio de Janeiro: Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)/FAPERJ. Scientific Research Training Report.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin. 2013. WALS Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durrleman, Stephanie & Bentea, Anamaria. 2021. Locality in the acquisition of object A’-dependencies: Insights from French. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 6: 106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durrleman, Stephanie et al. 2015. Complex syntax in autism spectrum disorders: A study of relative clauses. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 50(2): 260–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durrleman, Stephanie, Marinis, Theodoros. & Franck, Julie. 2016. Syntactic complexity in the comprehension of wh-questions and relative clauses in typical language development and autism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37: 1501–1527. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas. 2014. The syntax of adverbs. The Routledge handbook of syntax: 108–130.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara. 2017. Dislocations and framings. In Manual of Romance morphosyntax and syntax, Andreas Dufter & Elisabeth Stark (eds.), 472–501. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2007. Types of Topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds.), 87–116. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedmann, Naama, Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 2009. Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 119(1): 67–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. Growing trees: The acquisition of the left periphery. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 6(1): 1–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedmann, Naama, Rizzi, Luigi & Belletti, Adriana. 2017. No case for case in locality: Case does not help interpretation when intervention blocks a-bar chains. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 2(1): 33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerdes, Kim et al. 2018. SUD or surface-syntactic Universal Dependencies: An annotation scheme near-isomorphic to UD. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Universal Dependencies (UDW 2018), 66–74. Association for Computational Linguistics, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 2019. Improving surface-syntactic Universal Dependencies (SUD): MWEs and deep syntactic features. In Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT, SyntaxFest 2019), 126–132. Association for Computational Linguistics, Paris, France. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 2021. Starting a new treebank? go SUD! In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling, SyntaxFest 2021), 35–46. Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia, Bulgaria.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grillo, Nino. 2008. Generalized minimality: Syntactic underspecification in Broca’s aphasia. Ph. D. thesis, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
Guillaume, Bruno, de Marneffe, Marie-Catherine. & Perrier, Guy. 2019. Conversion et améliorations de corpus du français annotés en Universal Dependencies. Revue TAL, 60(2): 71–95.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gulordava, Kristina & Merlo, Paola. 2020. Computational quantitative syntax. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16: Selected papers from the 47th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Newark, Delaware Volume 16, 109. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2015. Verb second. In Syntax — Theory and Analysis, Artemis Alexiadou & Tiss Kibor (ed.), 242–283. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. & Roberts, Ian. 2013. The syntax–morphology relation. Lingua, 130: 111–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in chinese and the theory of grammar. Ph. D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ibbotson, Paul. 2013. The scope of usage-based theory. Frontiers in psychology, 4: 255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krapova, Iliana & Cinque, Guglielmo. 2008. On the order of wh-phrases in bulgarian multiple wh-fronting. In Formal Description of Slavic Languages: The Fifth Conference (FDSL5), Leipzig 2003, Gerhild Zybatow et al. (eds.), 318–336. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2008. Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3–4): 243–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merlo, Paola. 2015. Predicting word order universals. Journal of Language Modelling, 3(2): 317–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Quantitative computational syntax: Some initial results. Italian Journal of Computational Linguistics, 2(1): 11–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merlo, Paola & Ouwayda, Sarah. 2018. Movement and structure effects on universal 20 word order frequencies: A quantitative study. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 3(1): 1–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merlo, Paola & Stevenson, Suzanne. 1998. What grammars tell us about corpora: The case of reduced relative clauses. In Sixth Workshop on Very Large Corpora.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohr, Sabine. 2009. V2 as a single-edge phenomenon. Selected Papers from the 2006 Cyprus Syntaxfest: 141.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nivre, Joakim. 2015. Towards a universal grammar for natural language processing. In International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, 3–16. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of ip. Linguistic Inquiry, 20: 365–424.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Residual verb second and the wh-criterion. Parameters and functional heads, 2: 63–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic publisher. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, Volume 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Locality. Lingua, 130: 169–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Notes on labeling and subject positions. In Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, Volume 223, Cornelia Hamann, Simona Matteini & Elisa di Domenico (eds.), 17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Intervention effects in grammar and language acquisition. Probus, 30(2): 339–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Bocci, Giuliano. 2017. Left periphery of the clause: Primarily illustrated for italian. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition: 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samo, Giuseppe. 2019. A Criterial Approach to the Cartography of V2, Volume Linguistic Aktuelle 257. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022a. Criterial V2: ModP as a Locus of Microvariation in Swiss Romansh Varieties. Probus, 34(1): 143–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022b. Move to ModP or base-generated in FrameP? A quantitative cartographic study. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, LXVII(4): 345–361.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samo, Giuseppe & Merlo, Paola. 2019. Intervention effects in object relatives in English and Italian: A study in quantitative computational syntax. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Quantitative Syntax (Quasy, SyntaxFest 2019), 46–56. Paris: Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. Intervention effects in clefts: A study in quantitative computational syntax. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 6(1): 1–39.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanfelici, Emanuela, Caloi, Irene & Poletto, Cecilia. 2014. Subject object asymmetries in relative clauses: An investigation into three new empirical domains. Quaderni di lavoro ASIt, 18: 127–160.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanguinetti, Manuela & Bosco, Cristina. 2015. PartTUT: The Turin University Parallel Treebank. In Harmonization and Development of Resources and Tools for Italian Natural Language Processing within the PARLI Project. Studies in Computational Intelligence, Volume 589, Roberto Basili et al. (eds.), 51–69. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schweikert, Walter. 2005. The order of prepositional phrases in the structure of the clause, Volume 83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur. 1997. Clause structure and word order in Hebrew and Arabic: An essay in comparative Semitic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The cartographic enterprise in syntax. Language and linguistics compass, 4(6): 417–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Si, Fuzhen. 2019. A cartographic study of light verb constructions. Yuwen Xuexi (Linguistic Research), 1: 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sluckin, Benjamin L., Cruschina, Silvio & Martin, Fabienne. 2021. Locative inversion in germanic and romance: A conspiracy theory. In Continuity and Variation in Germanic and Romance, Sam Wolfe & Christine Mecklenborg-Nielsen (eds.), 165–192. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starke, Michal. 2001. Move Dissolves into Merge: A Theory of Locality. Ph. D. thesis, Université de Genève.
Sun, Yangyu. 2018. A cartographic analysis of the syntactic structure of mandarin ba. Studies in Chinese Linguistics, 39(2): 127–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takamine, Kaori. 2010. The postpositional hierarchy and its mapping to clause structure in Japanese. Ph. D. thesis, University of Tromso.
Tescari Neto, Aquiles. 2013. On verb movement in Brazilian Portuguese: A cartographic study. Ph. D. thesis, Università Ca’Foscari Venezia.
. 2022. “adverbs and functional heads” twenty years later: Cartographic methodology, verb raising and macro/micro-variation. The Linguistic Review, 39(2): 293–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. & van Koppen, Marjo. 2022. Quantitative approaches to syntactic variation. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Sjef Barbiers, Norbert Corver & Maria Polinsky (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Villata, Sandra, Rizzi, Luigi & Franck, Julie. 2016. Intervention effects and relativized minimality: New experimental evidence from graded judgments. Lingua, 179: 76–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfe, Sam. 2015. Microvariation in medieval romance syntax: A comparative study. Ph. D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
. 2022. Microvariation and change in the romance left periphery. Probus, 34(1): 235–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Charles et al. 2017. The growth of language: Universal grammar, experience, and principles of computation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81: 103–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Charles. 2004. Universal grammar, statistics or both? Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(10): 451–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeldes, Amir et al. 2022. A secondwave of UD hebrew treebanking and cross-domain parsing. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2022, Yoav Goldberg & Zornitsa Kozareva (eds.), 4331–4344. Abu Dhabi, UAE: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue