In:Morphology by Serial Optimization
Edited by Gereon Müller
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 289] 2025
► pp. 83–115
Itelmen subject-object agreement in Harmonic Serialism
Published online: 27 November 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.289.03bau
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.289.03bau
Abstract
In Itelmen, subject agreement surfaces as a prefix and object agreement in the form of a suffix. When it
comes to third person direct object agreement, these particular suffixes additionally encode the features of the subject and
are hence called (person) portmanteaus. Such portmanteaus only surface in the suffix slot and never in the prefix slot,
yielding a subject-object asymmetry. Bobaljik (2000) derives this asymmetry by
cyclic morphological realization, with Itelmen portmanteaus emerging as object suffixes with contextual subject features. This
assumption turns out to be problematic from the perspective of partially superfluous extended exponence
(Caballero and Harris 2012). The present reanalysis is based on the
pre-syntactic morphological theory of Inflectional Morphology in Harmonic Serialism (IMHS; Müller 2020). Assuming the order of object>subject, the derivation firstly selects the most specific compatible
object exponent; portmanteaus are also available for selection and are only selected within this sequence. When the derivation
continues to the subject exponent, all possible portmanteaus have already been considered for selection. This prevents a
portmanteau from taking the place of a subject exponent.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Overview
- 1.2Background
- 1.3Itelmen agreement
- 2.Analysis in Distributed Morphology (Bobaljik 2000)
- 3.Implementation in Harmonic Serialism
- 3.1Arrays and subarrays
- 3.2Harmonic serialist requirements
- 3.3Harmonic serialist derivation
- 4.Implementation of Itelmen data
- 4.1Paradigms and exponents
- 4.2Transitive paradigm derivation
- 4.3The Intransitive paradigm
- 4.4Class markers
- 5.Conclusion
Notes References
References (31)
Andermann, Felicitas (2022): Perspectives
on Inverse Marking. Master’s thesis, Universität Leipzig.
(2025): Portmanteaux
as an Epiphenomenon: The Case of Potawatomi. In: Morphology
by Serial Optimization. John Benjamins.
Bierwisch, Manfred (1967): Syntactic
Features in Morphology: General Problems of So-Called Pronominal Inflection in
German. In: To Honour Roman
Jakobson. Mouton, The Hague/Paris, pp. 239–270.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David (2000): ‘The ins and outs
of contextual allomorphy’, University of Maryland working papers in
linguistics 10, 35–71.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David and Susi Wurmbrand (2002): ‘Notes
on agreement in Itelmen’, Linguistic
discovery 1.
Bonet, Eulàlia and Daniel Harbour (2012): ‘Contextual
allomorphy’, The morphology and phonology of
exponence (41), 195–235.
Caballero, Gabriela and Alice C. Harris (2012): A
working typology of multiple
exponence. In: F. Kiefer, M. Ladányi and P. Síptar, eds, Current
Issues in Morphological Theory. John Benjamins Amsterdam, pp. 163–188.
Caballero, Gabriella and Sharon Inkelas (2013): ‘Word
Construction: Tracing an Optimal Path Through the
Lexicon’, Morphology 23 pp. 103–143.
Caha, Pavel (2024): ‘Root
and Stem Allomorphy without Multiple Exponence: The Case of Special
Nominatives’, Morphology 34(4) pp. 1–45.
Chomsky, Noam (1973): Conditions
on Transformations. In: S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky, eds, A
Festschrift for Morris Halle. Academic Press, New York, pp. 232–286.
Fenger, Paula (2017): Two
agreeing heads does not make you special: Restrictions on person
portmanteaux. In: Berkeley Linguistics
Society. pp. 75–94.
Georg, Stefan and Aleksandr Pavlovich Volodin (1999): Die
itelmenische Sprache: Grammatik und
Texte. Vol. 5, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.
Georgi, Doreen (2013): Deriving
the distribution of person portmanteaux by relativized
probing. In: NELS 42: Proceedings of the Forty-Second Annual
Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistics Students Association Amherst, pp. 155–168.
Gleim, Daniel, Gereon Müller, Mariia Privizentseva and Sören Tebay (2023): Reflexes
of Exponent Movement in Inflectional Morphology: A Study in Harmonic
Serialism. In: Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory 41. pp. 103–158.
Grofulovič, Jelena and Gereon Müller (2023): Cyclicity
and Extended Exponence. In: Linguistische Arbeits
Berichte 95. Universität Leipzig.
Halle, Morris (1997): Distributed
morphology: Impoverishment and
fission. In: B. Bruening, Y. Kang and M. McGinnis, eds, Papers
at the
Interface. Vol. 30, MITWPL, pp. 425–449.
Halle, Morris and Alec Marantz (1993): Distributed
morphology and the pieces of
inflection. In: F. Katamba, ed., Morphology.
Critical Concepts in
Linguisitcs. Routledge, pp. 111–176.
Harbour, Daniel (2023): ‘A
Trommer-first account of Georgian agreement’. CYCLOPS
talk, Universität Leipzig.
McCarthy, John J. (2010): ‘An Introduction to
Harmonic Serialism’, Language and Linguistics
Compass 4(10), 1001–1018.
Noyer, Rolf (1997): ‘Features,
positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure’, New York: Garland. Revised version of 1992 MIT Doctoral
Dissertation.
Popp, Marie-Luise (2025): ‘Delayed
exponence in Murrinhpatha: Stratal OT, not position classes’, Journal of
Linguistics.
Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky (2004): ‘Optimality
Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar’, Optimality Theory in phonology:
A reader pp. 1–71.
Rezac, Milan (2008): ‘The
forms of dative displacement: From Basauri to Itelmen’, Anuario del Seminario de
Filología Vasca”” Julio de
Urquijo” pp. 709–724.
Starke, Michal (2001): Move
Dissolves Into Merge: A Theory of Locality. PhD
thesis, University of Geneva.
Trommer, Jochen (1999): Morphology
consuming syntax’ resources: Generation and parsing in a minimalist version of Distributed
Morphology. In: Proceedings of the ESSLI workshop on resource
logics and minimalist
grammars. pp. 469–80.
