In:Morphology by Serial Optimization
Edited by Gereon Müller
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 289] 2025
► pp. 52–82
Portmanteaux as an epiphenomenon
The case of Potawatomi
Published online: 27 November 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.289.02and
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.289.02and
Abstract
In Potawatomi transitive animate (TA) verb forms, the first person plural object marker /nan/ occurs in the
context of a third person subject but not in the context of a second person subject (see Hockett (1948), Stump (2001)). At first sight, this suggests that /nan/
must be a portmanteau agreement marker, i.e., lexically specified for φ-features of both
arguments. However, portmanteau agreement gives rise to problems in some existing approaches to morphological exponence. In
this paper I show that in a derivational presyntactic merge-based morphological theory like Müller’s (2020) Inflectional Morphology in Harmonic Serialism, one can make do without this
assumption by deriving the distribution of /nan/ via the timing of exponent Merge operations relative to the end of the
derivation. Building on Andermann (2022, 2023), I assume that in Potawatomi, exponents realising a third person argument are always merged before exponents
realising a speech act participant (SAP, i.e., first or second person), and if both arguments are SAP, exponents realising the
object are merged before exponents realising the subject. I furthermore assume that the 1pl object marker /nan/ can
only be merged if no structure-building feature is unchecked, i.e., if the subject has already been realised, which is the
case in the context of a 3rd person subject but not in the case of a 2nd person subject. Thus, the distribution of /nan/ is an
epiphenomenon of the order of morphological operations. Moreover, by parametrising the order of merge operations, the analysis
can be extended to portmanteau agreement in Lakota.
Keywords: Algonquian, Lakota, salience, portmanteau, inverse marking, direct marking, transitive animate, person, cyclicity
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1The phenomenon
- 1.2State of the art
- 2.Background
- 2.1Transitive animate verbs in Potawatomi
- 2.2Andermann (2022, 2023) on inverse marking
- 3.Deriving /nan/ by the order of merge operations
- 3.1The portmanteau must be merged late
- 3.2Sample derivation: k-wapm-Uy-mUn (‘you see us’)
- 3.3Summary and extension to preterite contexts
- 3.4Outlook: Lakota portmanteaux
- 4.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (32)
Andermann, Felicitas (2022): Perspectives
on Inverse Marking. Master’s thesis, Universität Leipzig.
(2023): Cyclicity
in Morphological Movement: The Case of Potawatomi Inverse
Marking. In: Linguistische
Arbeitsberichte. Vol. 95, Universität Leipzig.
Bauer, Mark (2025, this
volume): Itelmen Subject-Object Agreement in Harmonic
Serialism. John Benjamins.
(1973): Conditions
on Transformations. In: S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky, eds, A
Festschrift for Morris Halle. Academic Press, New York, pp. 232–286.
(1991): Some
Notes on Economy of Derivation and
Representation. In: R. Freidin, ed., Principles
and Parameters in Comparative Grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 417–454.
Despić, Miloje, David Hamilton and Sarah E. Murray (2019): ‘A
Cyclic and Multiple Agree account. Person/ number marking in Cheyenne’, Natural
Language and Linguistic
Theory 37, 51–89.
Fenger, Paula (2018): ‘Multiple
agreeing persons is not that special: Restrictions on person portmanteaux’, University
of Pennsylvania Working Papers in
Linguistics 24(1), 66.
Georgi, Doreen (2013): Deriving
the distribution of person portmanteaux by relativized
probing. In: NELS 42: Proceedings of the Forty-Second Annual
Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistics Students Association Amherst, pp. 155–168.
Goddard, Ives (1969): Delaware
Verbal Morphology: A Descriptive and Comparative Study. PhD
thesis, Harvard.
Halle, Morris (1997): Distributed
Morphology: Impoverishment and
Fission. In: B. Bruening, Y. Kang and M. McGinnis, eds, Papers
at the
Interface. Vol. 30 of MIT
Working Papers in Linguistics
(MITWPL), MITWPL, pp. 425–449.
Halle, Morris and Alec Marantz (1993): Distributed
Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. MIT Press, pp. 111–176.
Kushnir, Yuriy (2015): Inverse
marking in Plains Cree. Master’s thesis, Universität Leipzig.
Lewis, Robert E. (2019): Theme Signs in
Potawatomi as Object Agreement and the
Inverse. In: M. Macaulay and M. Noodin, eds, Papers
of the Forty-Eigth Algonquian Conference. Michigan State University Press, pp. 123–142.
Lockwood, Hunter Thompson (2017): How the
Potawatomi Language Lives. Phd thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Müller, Gereon (2017): ‘Structure
removal: An argument for feature-driven Merge’, Glossa: a journal of general
linguistics 2(1).
Noyer, Robert Rolf (1992): Features, positions
and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. PhD
thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Oxford, Will (2018): ‘Inverse
marking and Multiple Agree in Algonquin: Complementarity and
variability’, p. 955–996.
(2022): ‘Probe
specification and agreement variation: Evidence from the Algonquian
inverse.’. URL: [URL]
Starke, Michal (2001): Move
Dissolves Into Merge. Phd thesis, University of Geneva.
Trommer, Jochen (2001): Distributed
Optimality. PhD thesis, University of Potsdam.
