In:Footprints of Phrase Structure: Studies in syntax in honour of Tim Stowell
Edited by María J. Arche, Jan-Wouter Zwart, Hamida Demirdache and Hagit Borer
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 288] 2025
► pp. 76–110
Postsyntactic morphology and the syntax of verb clusters
Published online: 2 October 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.288.05zwa
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.288.05zwa
Abstract
This article starts from the observation that (past/anterior) tense in infinitival clauses in Dutch
is expressed periphrastically. Interestingly, this also occurs with infinitives that undergo ‘restructuring’ by Wurmbrand’s (2001) criteria. It follows that a simple dichotomy into
tenseless infinitives that undergo restructuring and tensed infinitives that do not is incorrect, and that a
cartographic analysis where restructuring infinitives are mere VPs whereas nonrestructuring infinitives are TPs (or
larger) cannot work. The paper derives the properties of the various types of infinitives in a more dynamic framework
in which complex elements (such as verb clusters) may be derived in separate derivation layers, and proposes to
analyze restructuring as a function of this process of derivation layering.
Article outline
- 1.Nonfinite tense
- 2.Tenselessness
- 3.Postsyntactic morphology
- 4.Tense in verb clusters
- 5.Finiteness and tense
- 6.Restructuring
- 7.Restructuring in Dutch
- 8.The absence of long passives in Dutch
- 8.Restructuring and tense
- 9.Future ‘tense’
- 10.What is cluster formation?
- 11.Conclusion
Notes References
References (39)
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2001. Functional
structure in nominals: nominalization and
ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
ter Beek, Janneke. 2008. Restructuring
and infinitival complements in
Dutch. Dissertation, University of Groningen.
Benveniste, Émile. 1960. Être
et avoir dans leurs fonctions linguistiques. Bulletin de la
Société
Linguistique 55, 113–134.
Bhatt, Rajeesh and Stefan Keine. 2014. Verb
cluster formation and the semantics of head movement. Proceedings of
WCCFL 32.
Bobaljik, Jonathan D. and Susanne Wurmbrand. 2005. The
domain of agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory 23, 809–865.
Broekhuis, Hans, Norbert Corver, and Riet Vos. 2015. Syntax
of Dutch: Verbs and Verb Phrases volume
I. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks
on nominalization. In Readings in English
transformational grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs and Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Boston: Ginn.
. 1993. A
minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view
from Building 20: essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale and Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chumakina, Marina and Greville Corbett. 2013. Periphrasis:
the role of syntax and morphology in
paradigms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
den Besten, Hans, Jean Rutten, Tonjes Veenstra and Joop Veld. 1988. Verb
raising, extrapositie en de derde constructie. Unpublished
manuscript, University of Amsterdam.
den Dikken, Marcel. 1996. The
minimal links of verb (projection)
raising. In Minimal ideas: syntactic studies in the
minimalist framework, Werner Abraham, Samuel D. Epstein, Höskuldur Thráinsson, and Jan-Wouter Zwart (eds), 67–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Embick, David. 2000. Features,
syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect. Linguistic
Inquiry 31, 185–230.
Evers, Arnold. 1975. The
transformational cycle in
Dutch. Dissertation, Utrecht University.
Hoekstra, Teun. 1999. Auxiliary
selection in Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory 17, 67–84.
Hoffmann, T. Ronald. 1966. Past tense
replacement and the modal system. In Mathematical
linguistics and automatic translation, Anthony G. Oettinger (ed), 1–21. Cambridge: Harvard Computational Library.
Jacobson, Pauline. 1992. Raising
as function composition. In Control and
grammar, Richard K. Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri and James Higginbotham (eds), 149–194. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kayne, Richard S. 1993. Towards a
modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia
Linguistica 47, 3–31.
Lange, Klaus-Peter. 1981. Warum
Ersatzinfinitiv? Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen
Linguistik 19, 62–81.
Rutten, Jean. 1991. Infinitival
complements and
auxiliaries. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Talsma, Marjolein Wietske. In
preparation. Argument Structure as a function of Merge: from UTAH to
IDAHO. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido. 1989. Object
shift as an A-movement rule. MIT Working Papers in
Linguistics 11, 256–271.
Vendryes, Joseph. 1937. Sur
l’emploi de l’auxiliaire avoir pour marquer le
passé. In Mélanges de linguistique et de philologie
offerts à Jacq. van Ginneken à l’occasion du soixantième anniversaire de sa
naissance, Jan Wils, Rob Meesters and W. Slijpen (eds), 85–92. Paris: Klincksieck.
Wurmbrand, Susanne. 2001. Infinitives:
restructuring and clause
structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2005. Verb
clusters, verb raising and restructuring. In The
Blackwell Companion to syntax, Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), volume 5, 227–341. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 1993. Dutch
syntax: a minimalist
approach. Dissertation, University of Groningen.
. 1996. Verb
clusters in Continental West-Germanic
dialects. In Microparametric syntax and dialect
variation, James R. Black and Virginia Motapanyane (eds), 229–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2005. Verb-second
as a function of Merge. In The function of function
words and functional categories, Marcel den Dikken and Christina F. Tortora (eds), 11–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2011. Structure
and order: asymmetric merge. In The Oxford Handbook
of linguistic minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed), 96–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2014. The
tense of infinitives in Dutch. In Black book: a
Festschrift in honor of Frans Zwarts, Jack Hoeksema and Dicky Gilbers (eds), 363–387. Groningen: University of Groningen.
. 2015. Top-down
derivation, recursion, and the model of
grammar. In Syntactic complexity across
interfaces, Andreas Trotzke and Josef Bayer (eds), 25–42. Berlin: De Gruyter.
