In:Footprints of Phrase Structure: Studies in syntax in honour of Tim Stowell
Edited by María J. Arche, Jan-Wouter Zwart, Hamida Demirdache and Hagit Borer
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 288] 2025
► pp. 2–19
On the origins of phrase structure
Published online: 2 October 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.288.01bor
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.288.01bor
Abstract
In his doctoral dissertation and subsequent work, Stowell outlined a research agenda based on
replacing phrase structure rules with general universal constraints that can give rise to a constrained hierarchical
structure without recourse to arbitrary statements of hierarchy and order. This agenda ushered in a new era in formal
syntax, with the next two decades seeing the disappearance from the formal tool kit of syntactic rewrite rules, and
with the emergence of many new hypotheses on the origins of phrase structure. This chapter briefly reviews this agenda
and the specific principles and implementations put forth in Stowell and subsequent work.
Article outline
- 1.Stowell (1981): Replacing rewrite rules
- 2.The X′-scheme and rewrite rules in the 70’s
- 3.Dispensing with phrase structure rules altogether: OPS and subsequent
- 3.1The order of complements
- 3.2The Case Resistance Principle
- 4.Specifiers
- 5.Lastly…
Notes References
References (38)
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou and Florian Schäfer. 2015. External
Arguments in Transitivity Alternations: A Layering
Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borer, Hagit. 1994. The
projection of arguments. UMOP 17: Functional Projections. [URL]
Bresnan, Joan. 1972. Theory
of Complementation in English Syntax. PhD
dissertation, MIT.
. 1977. Variables
in the Theory of Transformations. In Culicover, Wasow and Akmajian, (eds.) 157–196.
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks
on Nominalizations. In R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds). Readings
in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn: 184–221.
Coopmans, Peter. 1989. Where
Stylistic and Syntactic Processes Meet: Locative Inversion in
English. Language 65: 728–751.
Culicover, Peter, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian. 1977 (eds). Formal
Syntax. Chicago: Academic Press.
Dresher, B. Elan and Norbert Hornstein. 1979. Trace
Theory and NP Movement Rules. Linguistic
Inquiry Vol. 10.1: 65–82.
Hoekstra, Teun and René Mulder. 1990. Unergatives
as Copular Verbs: Locational and Existential Predication. The Linguistic
Review 7: 1–79.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1977a. X′
Syntax: A study of Phrase Structure. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph
2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Johnson, Kyle. 1991. Object
positions. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory Vol. 9, No. 4 (Nov., 1991), pp. 577–636.
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa. 1986. Subjects
in Japanese and English. PhD
dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amhers.
Koopman, Hilda. 1984. The
syntax of verbs: From verb movement rules in the Kru languages to universal
grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
Koster, Jan. 1978. Why
Subject Sentences do not exist. In S. J. Keysern (ed.) Recent
Transformational Studies in European Languages. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph
3, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lightfoot, David 1977. On
traces and Conditions on Rules. in Culicover, Wasow and Akmajian, (eds.). 237–238.
Manzini, M. Rita. 1983. Restructuring
and Reanalysis. PhD
dissertation, MIT.
Polinsky, Maria and Preminger Omer 2019. The
Agreement Theta generalization. Glossa: a journal of general
linguistics 4(1): 102.
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb
Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP. Linguistic
Inquiry, Vol. 20.3: 365–424.
Sheehan, Michelle. 2012. A
New Take on Partial Control: Defective Thematic Intervention. Cambridge
Occasional Papers in
Linguistics 6, 1–47. [URL]
1981. Origins
of Phrase Structure. PhD
dissertation, MIT.
Travis, Lisa. 1984. Parameters
and Effects on Word Order Variation. PhD
dissertation, MIT.
