In:Elementary Predicates and Related Categories
Ludovico Franco
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 285] 2024
► pp. 188–213
Bibliography
Published online: 1 August 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.285.refs
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.285.refs
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2006). Serial
Verb Constructions in a Typological
Perspective. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Serial
verb constructions: a cross-linguistic
typology (pp. 1–87). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential
Object Marking: Iconicity vs.
economy. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory, 21(3), 435–483.
Alexiadou, A. (2001). Functional
structure in
nominals. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Alexiadou, A., Haegeman, L., & Stavrou, M. (2007). Noun
Phrase in the Generative
Perspective. Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter.
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Schäfer, F. (2009). PP
licensing in
nominalizations. In A. Schardl, M. Walkow, & M. Abdurrahman (Eds.), Proceedings
of NELS 38
(pp. 39–52). Ottawa, GLSA.
Alexiadou, A., & Stavrou M. (2011). Ethnic
adjectives as pseudo-adjectives. Studia
Linguistica, 65, 1–30.
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Schäfer, F. (2015). External
arguments in transitivity
alternations. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Aristar, A. A. (1996). The
relationship between dative and locative: Kuryłowicz’s argument from a
typological
perspective. Diachronica, XIII(2): 207–224.
Ariste, P. (1997). A
grammar of the Votic language. Bloomington and The Hague, Indiana University Press and Mouton.
Arkhangelskiy T., & Usacheva, M. (2015). Syntactic
and Morphosyntactic Properties of Postpositional Phrases in Beserman Udmurt
as Part-of-Speech Criteria. SKY Journal of
Linguistics, 28, 103–137.
Arsenijevic, B., Boleda, G., Gehrke, B., & McNally, L. (2014). Ethnic
adjectives are proper
adjectives. In R. Baglini, T. Grinsell, J. Keane, A. Roth Singerman, & J. Thomas (Eds.), CLS-46-I
the main session: 46th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic
Society (pp. 17–30). Chicago, IL, Chicago Linguistic Society.
Asbury, A. (2008). The
Morphosyntax of Case and
Adpositions. PhD dissertation, Universiteit
Utrecht.
Baerman, M., Brown, D. & Corbett, G. (2005). The
syntax-morphology interface: A study of
syncretism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Baggio, P. & Caircross, A. (2020). The
syntax of Puss in Boots and Sleeping Beauty. Proper names between
productivity and atomicity, Proceedings of
ConSOLE XXVIII.
Bahrami-Khorshid, S., & Golfam, A. (2013). Encoding
the Agent in Persian Passive Construction: A Cognitive
Approach. International Journal of
Humanities, 20(4), 79–97.
Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation:
A theory of grammatical function
changing. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
(1989). Object
sharing and projection in serial verb
constructions. Linguistic
Inquiry, 20(4), 513–553.
(1991). On
the Relation of Serialization to Verb
Extensions. In C. Lefebvre (Ed.), Serial
verbs: Grammatical, comparative and cognitive
approaches (pp. 79–102). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
(1992). Thematic
conditions on syntactic structures: Evidence from locative
applicatives. In I. M. Roca (Ed.), Thematic
structure: Its role in
grammar (pp. 23–46). Dordrecht: Foris.
Baker, P., & Kriegel, S. (2013). Mauritian
Creole structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
Bakker, P. (2003). Pidgin
inflectional morphology and its implications for creole
morphology. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook
of morphology
2002 (pp. 3–33), Dordrecht, Kluwer.
Baldi, B., & Savoia, L. M. (2019). Possessives
in North-Calabrian dialects. QULSO -Quaderni
del Dipartimento di
Linguistica, 7, 19–40.
(2021). Possessives,
from Franco-Provencal and Occitan systems to contact dialects in Apulia and
Calabria. Languages, 6(2), 63.
Barat, C., Carayol, M., & Vogel, C. (1977). Kriké
kraké: recueil de contes créoles
réunionnais. Paris, CNRS.
Bartning, I. (1980). Remarkes
sur la syntaxe et la semantique des pseudo adjectif de nominaux en
francais. Stockholm, Almvist & Wiksell International.
Barwise, J., & Cooper, R. (1981). Generalized
quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics
and
Philosophy, 4, 159–219.
Bassaganyas-Bars T. (2015). The
rise of haver as the existential predicate and the perfect
auxiliary: the case of Old
Catalan. Proceedings of Sinn und
Bedeutung 19, 107–124.
Baxter, A. N. (1988). A
grammar of Kristang (Malacca Creole
Portuguese). Canberra, Pacific Linguistics, Australian National University.
(2013). Papiá
Kristang structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
Belletti, A. (2004). Aspects
of the low IP
area. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The
Structure of IP and
CP (pp. 16–51). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Bellucci, G. (2017). Oblique
subjects: theoretical and experimental
perspectives. Ph.D. Dissertation, Università di Firenze.
Belvin, R. S. (1996). Inside
Events: The Non-Possessive Meanings of Possession Predicates and the
Semantic Conceptualization of
Events. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.
Bentley, D. (2013). Subject
canonicality and definiteness effects in Romance “there”
sentences. Language, 89, 675–712.
(2017). Copular
and existential
constructions. In A. Dufter, & E. Stark (Eds.), Manual
of Romance Morphosyntax and
Syntax (pp. 332–366). Berlin, De Gruyter.
Bentley, D., Ciconte, F. M., & Cruschina, S. (2015). Existential
and Locatives in Romance Dialects of
Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berwick, R., & Chomsky, N. (2011). The
biolinguistic program: The current state of its evolution and
development. In A. M. DiSciullo, & C. Boeckx (Eds.), The
Biolinguistic
Enterprise (pp. 19–41). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Biagui, N. B., & Quint, N. (2013). Casamancese
Creole structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available
online at [URL]).
(1989). Seselwa
serialization and its significance. Journal
of Pidgin and Creole
Languages, 4, 155–183.
Bisang, W. (1992). Das
Verb im Chinesischen, Hmong, Vietnamesischen, Thai und Khmer. Vergleichende
Grammatik im Rahmen der Verbserialisierung, der Grammatikalisierung und der
Attraktorpositionen. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.
(1996). Areal
typology and grammaticalization: Processes of grammaticalization based on
nouns and verbs in East and Mainland South East Asian
languages. Studies in
Language, 20, 519–597.
(1998). Adverbials: The view from the Far East. In J. van der Auwera & D. P. O´Baoill (Eds.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe (pp. 641–812). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bobaljik, J. (2012). Universals
in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of
Words. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.
Boeckx, C. (2009). The
nature of merge. Consequences for language, mind and
biology. In M. Piatelli Palmarini (Ed.), Of
minds and
language (pp. 44–57). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Boleda, G., Evert, S., Gehrke, B., & McNally, L. (2012). Adjectives
as saturators vs. modifiers: Statistical
evidence. In M. Aloni, V. Kimmelman, F. Roelofsen, G. Weidman Sassoon, K. Schulz, & M. Westera (Eds.), Logic,
language and meaning – 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands, December 19–21, 2011, Revised Selected
Papers (pp. 112–121). Dordrecht, Springer.
Boneh, N., & Sichel, I. (2010). Deconstructing
possession. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory, 28, 1–40.
Boneh, N., & Nash, L. (2012). Core
and non-core datives in
French. In B. Fernández & R. Etxepare (Eds.), Variation
in datives: A Microcomparative
Perspective (pp. 22–49). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Borer, H. (2003). Exo-Skeletal
vs. Endo-Skeletal Explanations: Syntactic Projections and the
Lexicon. In J. Moore & M. Polinsky (Eds.), The
Nature of Explanation in Linguistics
Theory (pp. 31–67). Stanford, CLSI Publications.
Borschev, V. & Partee, B. (2001). The
Russian genitive of negation in existentials sentences: The role of
Theme-Rheme structure reconsidered. Prague
Linguistic Circle Papers / Travaux du cercle linguistique de
Prague, 4, 185–250.
Bosque, I. & Picallo, C. (1996). Postnominal
adjectives in Spanish DPs. Journal of
Linguistics, 32, 349–385.
Bossong, G. (1985). Differentielle
Objektmarkierung in den Neuiranischen
Sprachen. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.
Bowden, J. (2001). Taba:
description of a South Halmahera
language. Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University, Pacific Linguistics.
Bresnan, J., & Moshi, L. (1990). Object
asymmetries in comparative Bantu
syntax. Linguistic
Inquiry, 21, 147–185.
Bruyn, A., Muysken, P., & Verrips, M. (1999). Double-object
constructions in the creole languages: development and
acquisition. In Michel DeGraff (Ed.), Language
creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony and
development (pp. 329–373). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Buell, L., & Sy, M. (2006). Affix
ordering In Wolof applicatives and
causatives. In J. Mugane, J. P. Hutchison, & D. A. Worman (Eds.), Selected
Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African
Linguistics (pp. 214–224). Somerville, Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Bunting, J. (2009). ‘Give’
and ‘take’: How dative gi contributed to the decline of
ditransitive taki. Journal
of Pidgin and Creole
Languages, 24, 199–217.
Caha, P. (2009). The
nanosyntax of case. PhD dissertation, CASTL & University of
Tromsø.
(2017). How
(not) to derive a *ABA: the case of Blansitt’s
generalisation. Glossa: a journal of general
linguistics, 2(1), 84–115.
Calabrese, A. (1998). Some
remarks on the Latin case system and its development in
Romance. In J. Lema, & E. Treviño (Eds.), Theoretical
advances on Romance
Languages (pp. 71–126). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
(2008). On
absolute and contextual
syncretism. In A. Nevins & A. Bachrach (Eds.), The
bases of inflectional
identity (pp. 156–205). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Capistrán Garza, A. (2015). Multiple
object constructions in P’orhépecha: Argument realization and
valence-affecting
morphology. Leiden, Brill.
Cardinaletti, A. (1998). On
the deficient/strong opposition in possessive
systems. In A. Alexiadou, & C. Wilder (Eds.), Possessors,
Predicates and Movement in the Determiner
Phrase (pp. 17–53). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Cardinaletti, A. & Starke, M. (1999). The
typology of structural deficiency. A case study of the three classes of
pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics
in the Languages of
Europe (pp. 145–233). Berlin, Mouton-De Gruyter.
Cardinaletti, A., & Giusti, G. (2016). The
syntax of the Italian indefinite determiner
dei. Lingua, 181, 58–80.
(2018). Micro-variation
in the Possessive Systems of Italian
Dialects. In J. Emonds, M. Janebová, & L, Veselovská (Eds.), Language
Use and Linguistic Structure. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics
Colloquium (pp. 137–154). Olomouc, Palacký University Press.
Carlson, G. (1977). Reference
to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of
Massachusetts at Amherst.
Carlson, R. (1991). Grammaticalisation
of postpositions and word order in Senufo
languages. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization. Vol. 2: Focus on types of grammatical markers (pp. 201–223). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Champollion L., & Krifka, M. (2016). Mereology. In M. Aloni, & P. Dekker (Eds.), The
Cambridge Handbook of Formal
Semantics (pp. 369–388). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Chierchia, G. (1998a). Plurality
of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic
parameter. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events
in
Grammar (pp. 53–104). Kluwer, Dordrecht.
(1998b). Partitives,
reference to kinds and semantic
variation. In A. Lawson (Ed.), Proceedings
from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 7)
(pp. 73–98).
(2000). Minimalist
inquiries: The
framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step
by step, essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard
Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
(2001a). Derivation
by Phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken
Hale: A Life in
Language, (pp. 1–54). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2001b). Beyond
explanatory adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers
in
Linguistics 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MITWPL.
(2015). Problems
of projection:
Extensions. In E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann, & S. Matteini (Eds.), Structures,
strategies and beyond -studies in honour of Adriana
Belletti, (pp. 3–16). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
(2020). The
UCLA Lectures (April 29 – May 2, 2019). <[URL]>
Chomsky, N., Gallego, Á, J., & Ott, D. (2019). Generative
Grammar and the Faculty of Language: Insights, Questions and
Challenges. Catalan Journal of
Linguistics, Special
Issue, 229–261.
Chumakina, M. (2011). Nominal periphrasis. A canonical approach. Studies in Language, 35, 247–274.
Cinque, G. (1994). On
the Evidence for Partial N-Movement in the Romance
DP. In G. Cinque, J. Koster, J-Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi, & R. Zanuttini (Eds.), Paths
Towards Universal Grammar. Studies in Honor of Richard S.
Kayne, 85–110. Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press.
(2007). La
natura grammaticale del diminutivo e del
vezzeggiativo. In R. Maschi, N. Penello, & P. Rizzolatti (Eds.), Miscellanea
di studi liguistici offerti a Laura Vanelli da amici e allievi
padovani (pp. 229–236). Udine, Forum.
(2010a). Mapping
Spatial PPs: an
Introduction. In G. Cinque & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping
Spatial PPs, The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol.
6 (pp. 3–25). New York, Oxford University Press.
(2015). Augmentative,
pejorative, diminutive and endearing heads in the extended nominal
projection. In E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann, & S. Matteini (Eds.), Structures,
strategies and beyond -studies in honour of Adriana
Belletti (pp. 67–81). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Cinque, G., & Rizzi, L. (2010). The
cartography of syntactic
structures. In B. Heine, & H. Narrog (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of linguistic
analysis (pp. 51–65). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Clements, J. C. (2013). Korlai
structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
Cole, P. (1983). The
grammatical role of the causee in Universal
Grammar. International Journal of American
Linguistics, 49, 115–133.
Collins, C. (1997). Argument
sharing in serial verb
constructions. Linguistic
Inquiry, 28(3), 461–497.
Colot S, & Ludwig, R. (2013a). Guadeloupean
Creole structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
(2013b). Martinican
Creole structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
(1999). Spatial
cases in Daghestanian
languages. Sprachtypologie und
Universalienforschung, 52, 108–117.
Comrie, B. & Polinsky, M. (1998). The
great Daghestanian case
hoax. In A. Siewierska & J. J. Song (Eds.), Case,
Typology and Grammar: In Honor of Barry J.
Blake (pp. 95–114). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Corne, C, Coleman D., & Curnow, S. (1996). Clause
reduction in asyndetic coordination in Isle de France creole: The ‘serial
verbs’
problem. In P. Baker & A. Syea (Eds.), Changing
meanings, changing
functions (pp. 129–154). London, University of Westminster Press.
Craig, C., & Hale, K. (1988). Relational
Preverbs in Some Languages of the Americas: Typological and Historical
Perspectives. Language, 64, 312–344.
Creissels, Denis
(2006). Encoding the distinction between
location, source, and
destination. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space
in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive
Categories (pp. 19–28). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Creissels, D. (2010). Benefactive
applicative periphrases: a typological
approach. In F. Zúñiga & S. Kittilä (Eds.), Benefactives
and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case
studies (pp. 29–69). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Cruschina, S. (2015). Patterns
of variation in existential
constructions. Isogloss. A journal on
variation of Romance and Iberian
languages, 1(1), 33–65.
(2010). Two
types of (apparently) ditransitive light verbs
constructions. In K. Arregi, Z. Fagyal, S. A. Montrul, & A. Tremblay (Eds.), Romance
Linguistics 2008. Interaction in Romance. Selected Papers from the 38th.
Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. Urbana-Champaign, April
2008 (pp. 139–154). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Dahl Ö., & Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (2001). Kinship
in
grammar. In I. Baron, M. Herslund & F. Sørensen (Eds.), Dimensions
of
Possession, (pp. 201–243). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
De Belder, M. (2011). A morphosyntactic decomposition of countability in Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 14 (3), 173-202.
De Belder, M., Faust, N. & Lampitelli, N. (2014). On
a low and a high
diminutive. In A. Alexiadou, H. Borer, & F. Schäfer (Eds.), The
syntax of roots and the roots of
syntax (pp. 149–163). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Déchaine, R-M., Girard, R., Mudzingwa, C., & Wiltschko, M. (2014). The
internal syntax of Shona class
prefixes. Language
Sciences, 43, 18–46.
DeGraff, M. (2001). On
the Origin of Creoles: A Cartesian Critique of Neo-Darwinian
Linguistics. Linguistic
Typology, 5(2–3), 213–310.
(2007). Kreyòl
Ayisyen or Haitian
Creole. In J. Holm, & P. Patrick (Eds.), Comparative
creole syntax. Parallel outlines of 18 creole
grammars (pp. 101–126). London/Colombo: Battlebridge.
Demirdache, H., & Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (2000). The
primitives of temporal
relations. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step
by step, essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard
Lasnik, 157–186. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Den Dikken, M. (1991). Serial
Verbs, ‘Object Sharing’, and the Analysis of Dative
Shift. Linguistics in the
Netherlands, 8, 31–40.
(2006). Relators
and linkers: A study of predication, predicate inversion and
copulas. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
(2010). On
the functional structure of locative and directional
PPs. In G. Cinque & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping
Spatial PPs, The Cartography of Syntactic
Structures, Vol. 6
(pp. 74–126). New York, Oxford University Press.
Den Dikken, M., & Dékány, É. (2018). Adpositions
and case: Alternative realisation and
concord. Finno-Ugric Languages and
Linguistics 7(2).
Devonish, H., & Thompson, D. (2013). “Creolese”. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), The
survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. I: English-based and Dutch-based
languages (pp. 49–60). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Di Garbo, F. (2014). Gender
and its interaction with number and evaluative morphology: An intra- and
intergeneralogical typological survey of
Africa. PhD Dissertation. Stockholm University.
Durie, M. (1988). Verb
Serialization and ‘Verbal Prepositions’ in Oceanic
Languages. Oceanic
Linguistics, 27(1–2), 1–23.
(1997). Grammatical
structures in verb
serialization. In A. Alsina, J. Bresnan, & P. Sells (Eds.), Complex
predicates (pp. 289–354). Stanford, CSLI Publications.
Ehrhart S., & Revis, M. (2013). Tayo
structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
Ehrhart, S. (1993). Le
créole français de St-Louis (le tayo) en
Nouvelle-Calédonie. Hamburg, Helmut Buske.
(2015b). Direccionales
con con y Marcado Diferencial de
Objeto. Revue
Romane 50, 163–190.
(2020). Morphologically
Derived Adjectives in
Spanish. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Farquharson, J. T. (2013). Jamaican
structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
Filbeck, D. (1975). A
grammar of verb serialization in
Thai. In J. G. Harris, & J. R. Chamberlain (Eds.), Studies
in Tai linguistics in honor of William J.
Gedney (pp. 112–129). Bangkok, Central Institute of English Language.
Filchenko, A. Y. (2007). A
Grammar of Eastern Khanty. PhD dissertation, Rice
University.
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The
case for
case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals
in linguistic
theory (pp. 1–88). New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
(1986). Pragmatically
controlled zero
anaphora. In Proceedings
of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics
Society, 95–107. Berkeley, CA, BLS.
Finney, M. A. (2013). Krio
structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
Folli, R., & Harley, H. (2007). Causation,
obligation, and argument structure: on the nature of little
v. Linguistic
Inquiry, 38(2), 197–238.
Folli, R. (2008). Complex
PPs in
Italian. In A. Asbury, J. Dotlačil, B. Gehrke, & R. Nouwen (Eds.), Syntax
and Semantics of Spatial
P (pp. 197–220). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Folli, R., Harley, H., & Karimi, S. (2005). Determinants
of event structure in Persian complex
predicates. Lingua, 115, 1365–1401.
Forman, M. L. (1972). Zamboangueño
texts with grammatical analysis. A Study of Philippine Creole
Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
Francez, I., & Koontz-Garboden, A. (2016). A
note on possession and mereology in Ulwa property concept
constructions. Natural Language &
Linguistic
Theory, 34, 93–106.
(2017). Semantics
and morphosyntactic variation: Qualities and the grammar of property
concepts. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Franco, L. (2013). Before
strikes back: An *ABA constraint on temporal
expressions. Acta Linguistica
Hungarica, 60(3), 265–301.
(2015a). The
morphosyntax of adverbs of thecarpone/i type in (Old and Modern)
Italian. Probus, 27(2), 271–306.
(2016). Axial
Parts, phi-features and
degrammaticalization. Transactions of the
Philological
Society, 114, 149–170.
(2018). On
Nominalization: Genitives, Datives, and Elementary Predicates in
Italian. In A. Bloch-Rozmej, & A. Bondaruk (Eds.), Studies
in Formal Linguistics Universal Patterns and Language Specific
Parameters (pp. 73–90). Frankfurt, Peter Lang.
(2020). (Im)proper
prepositions in (Old and Modern)
Italian. In L. Franco & P. Lorusso (Eds.), Linguistic
Variation: Structure and
Interpretation (pp. 249–272). Berlin, De Gruyter Mouton.
Franco, L., Baldi, B. & Savoia, L. M. (2020). Collectivizers
in Italian (and beyond). The interplay between collectivizing and evaluating
morphology (and the Div paradox). Studia
Linguistica, 74, 2–41.
Franco, L., Bellucci, G., Dal Pozzo, L., & Manzini, M. R. (2017). Locatives,
Part and Whole in
Uralic. In J. Emonds & M. Janebovà (Eds.), Language
Use and Linguistic Structure – selected proceedings of OLINCO
2016 (pp. 283–304). Olomouc, Palacky University Press.
Franco, L., & Lorusso, P. (2019). The
expression of proper location and beyond: motion-to and state-in in Italian
spatial
adpositions. In M. Baird & J. Pesetsky (Eds), NELS
49: Proceedings of the Forty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the North East
Linguistic Society: Volume
1 (pp. 279–290). GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
(2020). Aspectual
datives (and
instrumentals). In A. Pineda & J. Mateu (Eds.), Dative
constructions in Romance and
beyond (pp. 175–194). Berlin, Language Science Press.
Franco, L., Manzini M. R., & Savoia, L. M. (2015a). N
Class and Its Interpretation: The Neuter in Central Italian Varieties and
Its Implications. Isogloss. A Journal on
Variation of Romance and Iberian
Languages, 1, 41–68.
(2021). Locative
PS as general relators. Location, direction, DOM in
Romance. Linguistic
Variation, 21, 135–73.
Franco, L., & Manzini, M. R. (2017a). Genitive/‘of’
Arguments in DOM Contexts. Revue Roumaine De
Linguistique, LXII, 427–444.
(2017b). Instrumental
prepositions and case: Contexts of occurrence and alternations with
datives. Glossa, 2(1), 8.
Gallego, Á. (2010). Phase
Theory. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Ganfi, V., & Piunno, V. (2017). Preposizioni
complesse in italiano antico e contemporaneo. Grammaticalizzazione,
schematismo e produttività. Archivio
Glottologico
Italiano, CII(2), 184–204.
Garzonio, J., & Rossi, S. (2016). Case
in Italian Complex
PPs. In E. Carrilho, A. Fiéis, M. Lobo & S. Pereira (Eds.), Romance
Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 28,
Lisbon (pp. 121–138). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Gavarro, A. & Heshmati, Y. (2014). An investigation on the comprehension of Persian passives in typical development and autism. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 13, 79–98.
Gerdts, D., & Hinkson, M. (2004). The
grammaticalization of Halkomelem ‘face’ into a dative applicative
suffix. International Journal of American
Linguistics, 70(3), 227–250.
Ghomeshi, J. (1997). Non-Projecting
Nouns and the Ezafe: Construction in
Persian. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory, 15, 729–788.
Giusti, G. (2015). Nominal
Syntax at the Interfaces. A Comparative Study of Languages with
Articles. Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Givón, T. (1975). Serial
verbs and syntactic
change. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Word
order and word order
change (pp. 47–112). Austin, University of Texas Press.
Goury, L. & Migge, B. (2003). Grammaire
du nengee: Introduction aux langues aluku, ndyuka et
pamaka. Paris, Editions IRD.
Grandi, N. (2001). Su
alcune presunte anomalie della morfologia
valutativa. Archivio
Glottologico, 86, 25–56.
(2003). Mutamenti
innovativi e conservativi nella morfologia valutativa dell’italiano.
Origine, sviluppo e diffusione del suffisso accrescitivo
–one. In N. Maraschio, & T. Poggi Salani (Eds.), Italia
linguistica anno Mille – Italia linguistica anno Duemila. Atti del XXXIV
Congresso Internazionale di Studi della Società di Linguistica
Italiana (pp. 243–258). Roma, Bulzoni.
(2012). Inverse
Number Marking and Individuation in
Dagaare. In D. Massam (Ed.), Count
and Mass Across
Languages (pp. 75–98). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
(2011). The
Gulf of Guinea creoles. Genetic and typological
relations. Journal of Pidgin and Creole
Languages, 26(1), 111–154.
(2013). Santome
structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
Hagemeijer, T. & Ogie, O. (2011). Edo
influence on Santome: evidence from verb serialization and
beyond. In C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Creoles,
their substrates, and language
typology (pp. 37–60). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Haig, G. (2008). Alignment
Change in Iranian Languages: A Construction Grammar
Approach. Berlin and New York, Mouton de Gruyter.
Hajek, J. (2006). Serial
verbs in Tetun
Dili. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Serial
Verb Constructions: a Cross-Linguistic
Typology (pp. 239–253). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Hakulinen, L. (1979). Suomen
kielen rakenne ja kehitys. (4th revised
ed.). Otavan korkeakoulukirjasto. Helsinki, Otava.
Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (1993). On
argument structure and the lexical expression of grammatical
relations. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The
view from building 20
(pp. 53–109). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Halle, M. (1997). Distributed
Morphology: Impoverishment and
Fission. In B. Bruening, Y. Kang, & M. McGinnis (Eds.), PF:
Papers at the Interface, MIT Working Papers in
Linguistics 30,
(pp. 425–449). Cambridge, MA, MITWPL.
Halle, M. & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed
Morphology and the Pieces of
Inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The
view from building 20
(pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Hanske, T. (2007). Ditransitive
constructions in Vietnamese: How to integrate serial verb constructions and
systemic zero-anaphora in a typology of alignment
patterns. Paper Presented at
the Conference on Ditransitive
Constructions, 23–25 November 2007. Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Harley, H. (2002). Possession
and the Double Object
Construction. Linguistic Variation
Yearbook, 2, 29–68.
(2008). When
is a Syncretism more than a
Syncretism? In D. Harbour, D. Adger & S. Béjar (Eds.), Phi-Theory:
Phi-features across Interfaces and
Modules (pp. 251–294). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
(2009). The
morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of
vP. In A. Giannakidou & M. Rathert (Eds.), Quantification,
Definiteness and
Nominalization (pp. 321–343). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
(2013). External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua, 125, 34-57.
(2013). Expletive
subject of existential
verb. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
(2019) Differential place marking and differential object marking. STUF - Language Typology and Universals, 72(3), 313-334.
Haspelmath, M., & Michaelis, S. (2008). Leipzig
fourmille de typologues: Genitive objects in
comparison. In G. Corbett, & M. Noonan (Eds.), Case
and grammatical relations: Studies in honor of Bernard
Comrie (pp. 149–166). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Heine, B. (1997). Possession.
Cognitive sources, forces, and
grammaticalization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Heine, B. & König, C. (2010). On
the linear order of ditransitive
objects. Language
Sciences, 32, 87–131.
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2002). World
lexicon of
grammaticalization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Hemmings, C. (2013). Causatives
and applicatives: The case for polysemy in
Javanese. SOAS Working Papers in
Linguistics, 16, 167–194.
Hoekstra, T. (1999). Parallels
between nominal and verbal
projections. In D. Adger, S. Pintzuk, B. Plunkett, & G. Tsoulas (Eds.), Specifiers:
Minimalist
approaches (pp. 163–187). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Hohnerlein-Buchinger, T. (1996). Per
un sublessico vitivinicolo. La storia materiale e linguistica di alcuni nomi
di viti e vini
italiani. Tübingen, Niemeyer.
Holmberg, A. (2002). Prepositions
and PPs in Zina
Kotoko. In B. Kappel Schmidt, D. Odden, & A. Holmberg (Eds.), Some
Aspects of the Grammar of Zina
Kotoko (pp. 162–174). Munich, Lincom Europa.
Huang, C.-T. J., Li, Y.-H. A., & Li, Y. (2009). The
Syntax of
Chinese. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Huumo, T., & Ojutkangas, K. (2006). An
introduction to Finnish spatial relations: Local cases and
adpositions. In M-L. Helasvuo & L. Campbell (Eds.), Grammar
from the human perspective: Case, space and person in
Finnish (pp. 11–20). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Intumbo, I., Inverno, L. & Holm, J. (2013). Guinea-Bissau
Kriyol structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
Itkonen, T. (1997). Reflections
on PreUralic and the Saami-Finnic
protolanguage. Finnisch-Ugrische
Forschungen, 54, 229–266.
Jacob, J., & Grimes, C. (2011). Aspect
and directionality in Kupang Malay serial verb constructions: Calquing on
the grammars of substrate
languages. In C. Lefebvre (Ed.), Creoles, their substrates, and language
typology (pp. 337–366). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jakobson, R. (1936). Contribution
to the General Theory of Case: General Meanings of the Russian
Cases. In L. Waugh & M. Halle (Eds.), Roman
Jakobson. Russian and Slavic Grammar: Studies
1931–1981 (pp. 59–103). Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter.
Jansen, B, Koopman, H., & Muysken, P. (1978). Serial
verbs in the creole languages. Amsterdam
Creole
Studies, 2, 125–159.
Jeong, Y. (2007). Applicatives:
Structure and interpretation from a minimalist
perspective. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Jóhannsdóttir, K. (2012). Aspects
of the progressive in English and
Icelandic. PhD Dissertation, University of British Columbia.
Johns, A. & Thurgood, B. (2011). Axial
Parts in Inuktitut and Uzbeki. Proceedings of
the 2011 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic
Association.
Josselin de Jong, J.P.B. de.
(1926). Het huidige
Negerhollandsch (teksten en
woordenlijst). Amsterdam, Koninklijke Academie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam.
Jurafsky, D. (1996). Universal
tendencies in the semantics of the
diminutive. Language, 72(3), 533–578.
Karimi, S. (1997). Persian
complex predicates and LF
incorporation. Proceedings of the Chicago
Linguistic
Society (CLS), 33, 215–229.
Karimi, S, & Brame, M. (1986). A
generalization concerning the Ezafe construction in
Persian. West Coast Conference in
Linguistics (WECOL
86), Vancouver, Canada
(2004a). ‘Here
and
There’. In C. Leclère, É. Laporte, M. Piot, & M. Silberztein (Eds.), Lexique,
syntaxe, et lexique-grammaire (Syntax, Lexis, and Lexicon-Grammar): Papers
in Honour of Maurice Gross (Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Supplementa, 24)
(pp. 275–285). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
(2004b). Prepositions
as Probes. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures
and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol.
3 (pp. 192–212). New York, Oxford University Press.
(2007). A
Short Note on Where vs.
Place. In R. Maschi, N. Penello, & P. Rizzolatti (Eds.), Miscellanea
di studi liguistici offerti a Laura Vanelli da amici e allievi
padovani (245–257). Udine, Forum.
Keenan, E. (1987). A
semantic definition of indefinite
NP. In E. Reuland & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), The
representation of
(in)definiteness (pp. 286–317). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Kim, K. (2012). Argument
Structure Licensing and English have. Journal
of
Linguistics, 48(1), 71–105.
Kittilä, S. & Ylikoski, J. (2011). Remarks
on the coding of Goal, Recipient, and Vicinal Goal in European
Uralic. In S. Kittilä, K. Västi, & J. Ylikoski (Eds.), Case,
Animacy and Semantic Roles pp.
(29–64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Klingler, T. A. (2003). ‘If
I could turn my tongue like that’: The Creole Language of Pointe Coupee
Parish, Louisiana. Baton Rouge/London, Louisiana State University Press.
Koopman, H. (1984). The
syntax of Verbs: from Verb movement rules in the Kru languages to Universal
Grammar. Dordrecht, Foris.
(2000). Prepositions,
postpositions, circumpositions, and
particles. In Hilda Koopman (Ed.), The
Syntax of Specifiers and
Heads (pp. 204–260). London, Routledge.
Kouwenberg, S. (2013). Papiamentu
structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
Kulikov, L. (2009). Evolution
of Case
Systems. In A. Malchukov & A. Spencer (Eds), The
Oxford Handbook of
Case (pp. 439–457). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Kuo, P-J. (2010). Transitivity
and the ba
construction. Taiwan Journal of
Linguistics, 8(1), 95–128.
La Fauci, N. & Loporcaro, M. (1993). Grammatical
relations and syntactic levels in Bonorvese
morphosyntax. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Syntactic
Theory and the Dialects of
Italy (pp. 155–203). Torino, Rosenberg & Sellier.
Laalo, K. (2009). Acquisition
of Case and Plural in
Finnish. In U. Stephany & M. Voeikova (Eds.), Development
of Nominal Inflection in first Language Acquisition: a Cross-Linguistic
Perspective (pp 49–90). Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.
Larson, R., & Yamakido, H. (2008). Ezafe
and the deep position of nominal
modifiers. In L. McNally & C. Kennedy (Eds.), Adjectives
and adverbs: Syntax, semantics and
discourse (pp. 43–70). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Larson, R., & V. Samiian
(2020). The Ezafe construction
revisited. In R. Larson, S. Moradi & V. Samiian (Eds.), Advances
in Iranian
Linguistics (pp. 173–236). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Laury, R. (1997). Demonstratives
in interaction: The emergence of a definite article in
Finnish. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Ledgeway, A. (2020). The
causative construction in the dialects of southern Italy and the phonology
syntax
interface. In L. Franco, & P. Lorusso (Eds.), Linguistic
Variation: Structure and
Interpretation (pp. 371–400). Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter.
Lefebvre, C. (1991). Take
serial verb constructions in
Fon. In C. Lefebvre (Ed.), Serial
verbs: Grammatical, comparative and cognitive
approaches (pp. 37–78). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
(1998). Creole
genesis and the acquisition of grammar: The case of Haitian
Creole. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Lekakou, M. & Szendrői, K. (2012). Polydefinites
in Greek: Ellipsis, close apposition and expletive
determiners. Journal of
Linguistics, 48, 107–149.
Leonetti, M. (2008). Definiteness
Effects and the Role of the Coda in Existential
Constructions. In H. Hoeg-Müller & A. Klinge (Eds.), Essays
on Nominal
Determination (pp. 131–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S, A. (1976). Subject
and topic: a new typology of
language. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject
and
Topic (pp. 457–461). Austin, University of Texas Press.
Lim, L. & Ansaldo, U. (2013). Singlish
structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
Link, G. (1983). The
Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-theoretical
Approach. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning,
Use, and Interpretation of
Language, (pp. 302–323). Berlin, De Gruyter.
Longobardi, G. (1994). Reference
and Proper Names: A Theory of N-Movement in Syntax and Logical
Form. Linguistic
Inquiry, 25, 609–665.
(1996). The
Syntax of N-Raising: A Minimalist Theory. OTS
Working
Papers. Utrecht, Utrecht University.
(2001). Formal
syntax, diachronic minimalism, and etymology: The history of French
chez. Linguistic
Inquiry, 32, 275–302.
(2008). Reference
to individuals, person, and the variety of mapping
parameters. In A. Klinge & H. Høeg Müller (Eds.), Essays
on Nominal Determination: from morphology to
discourse (pp. 189–211). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Lord, C. (1989). Syntactic reanalysis in the historical development of serial verb constructions in languages of West Africa, PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
(1993). Historical
Change in Serial Verb
Constructions. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Lorusso, P., & Franco, L. (2017). Patterns
of syntactic agreement with embedded
NPs. Lingua, 195, 39–56.
Lovestrand, J. (2017). Temporal
iconicity and verb order in instrumental
SVCs. Hand-out of a talk given at SLE, 10
September 2017.
(2018). Serial
verb constructions in Barayin: Typology, description and LexicalFunctional
Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of
Oxford.
Ludwig, R. (1996). Kreolsprachen
zwischen Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit. Zur Syntax und Pragmatik
atlantischer Kreolsprachen auf französischer
Basis. Tübingen, Gunter Narr.
Luraghi S. (2003). On
the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases. A Study of the Expression of Semantic
Roles in Ancient
Greek. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
(2011). The
coding of spatial relations with human landmarks: From Latin to
Romance. In S. Kittilä, K. Västi, & J. Ylikoski (Eds.), Case,
Animacy and Semantic
Roles (pp. 209–234). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Lyons, J. (1967). A
note on possessive, existential and locative
sentences. Foundations of
Language, 3, 390–396.
McGinnis, M. (1998). Locality
in A-movement. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Malchukov, A. (2008). Animacy
and asymmetries in differential case
marking. Lingua, 118(2), 203–221.
Manzini, M. R., & Wexler, K. (1987). Parameters,
Binding Theory, and Learnability. Linguistic
Inquiry, 18, 413–444.
Manzini, M. R., & Savoia L. M. (2002). Parameters
of subject inflection in Italian
dialects. In P. Svenonius (Eds.), Subjects,
Expletives and the
EPP (pp. 157–199). New York, Oxford University Press.
(2005). I
dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi
generativa (3 volumes) Alessandria, Edizioni dell’Orso.
(2007). A
unification of morphology and syntax. Studies in Romance and Albanian
varieties. London, Routledge.
(2011b). Reducing
‘case’ to denotational primitives: Nominal inflections in
Albanian. Linguistic
Variation, 11(1), 76–120.
Manzini, M. R. (2014). Grammatical
categories: Strong and weak pronouns in
Romance. Lingua, 150, 171–201.
Manzini, M. R. & Savoia, L. M. (2014) From Latin to Romance: case loss and preservation in pronominal systems. Probus, 26(2), 217-248.
Manzini, M. R., Savoia, L. M., & Franco, L. (2015). Ergative
case, Aspect and Person splits: Two case
studies. Acta Linguistica
Hungarica, 62(3), 297–351.
Manzini, M. R., & Franco, L. (2016). Goal
and DOM datives. Natural Language and
Linguistic
Theory, 34, 197–240.
Manzini, M. R. (2017). Passive,
smuggling and the
by-phrase. In N. LaCara, K. Moulton & A-M. Tessier (Eds.), A
Schrift to Fest Kyle
Johnson (pp. 233–244). University of Massachusets – Amherst.
Manzini, M. R., & Savoia L. M. (2017a). N
morphology and its interpretation: The neuter in Italian and Albanian
varieties. In A. Bloch-Rozmej & A. Bondaruk (Eds.), Constraints
on Structure and Derivation in Syntax, Phonology and
Morphology (pp. 213–236). Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang.
(2017b). Gender,
number and inflectional class in Romance: Feminine/plural
–a. In J. Emonds & M. Janebova (Eds.), Language
Use and Linguistic
Structure (pp. 263–282). Olomouc, Palacky University Olomouc.
Manzini, M. R., & Franco, L. (2019). ‘Agreement
of structural obliques’
parameter. Lingvisticae
Investigationes, 42(1), 82–101.
Manzini, M. R., Franco, L., & Savoia, L. M. (2019). Suffixaufnahme,
Oblique Case and
Agree. In L. Franco, M. Marchis Moreno, & M. Reeve (Eds.), Agreement,
Case and Locality in the Nominal and Verbal
Domains (pp. 211–255). Berlin, Language Science Press.
Manzini, M. R., Savoia, L. M., & Franco, L. (2020). DOM
and Dative in
Italo-Romance. In A. Bárány & L. Kalin (Eds.), Case,
agreement, and their interactions: New perspectives on Differential Object
Marking, Berlin, De Gruyter.
Manzini, M. R. (2020). The
morphosyntactic structure of number in Italian and Albanian. High and low
plurals. Catalan Journal of
Linguistics, 19, 127–157.
(1993). Implications
of asymmetries in double object
constructions. In S. Mchombo (Ed.), Theoretical
aspects of Bantu
grammar (pp. 113–150). Stanford, CA, CSLI.
(1997). No
escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your
own
lexicon. In A. Dimitriadis (Ed.), UPenn
working papers in linguistics, vol.
4.2 (pp. 201–225). Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania.
(2007). Phases
and words. In S. H. Choe (Ed.), Phases
in the Theory of
Grammar (pp. 191–222). Seul, Dong-In Publishing Company.
Marchis Moreno, M. (2010). Relational
adjectives at the Syntax/Morphology Interface in Romanian and
Spanish. PhD Dissertation, Stuttgart University.
2018. Relational
Adjectives in Romance and English Mismatches at
Interfaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marchis Moreno, M., & Franco, L. (2020). Intervention
in agreement and case assignment: the role of
doubling. Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi
Orientali –
QULSO 6, 125–159.
Markey, T. L. (1982). Afrikaans:
Creole or Non-Creole? Zeitschrift für
Dialektologie und
Linguistik, 49(2), 169–207.
Masi, S. (2020). Variation
in the Possession of kinship terms in the Dialects of
Italy. Proceedings of the 2020 CLA – Canadian
Linguistic Association meeting.
Matisoff, J. A. (1991). Areal
and universal dimensions of grammatization in
Lahu. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches
to grammaticalization, Vol. 2
(pp. 383–453). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
Matushansky, O. (2009). On
the linguistic complexity of proper
names. Linguistics and
Philosophy, 31, 573–627.
Maurer, P. (1995). L’angolar.
Un créole afro-portugais parlé à São Tomé. Notes de grammaire, textes,
vocabulaire. Hamburg, Buske.
(2009). Principense.
Grammar, texts, and vocabulary of the Afro-Portuguese Creole of the Island
of Príncipe, Gulf of
Guinea. London/Colombo, Battlebridge.
(2013). Angolar
structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
Mazzoli, M. (2015). Complexity
in gradience: the serial verb take in Nigerian
Pidgin. In A. D. M. Smith, G. Trousdale & R. Waltereit (Eds.), New
Directions in Grammaticalization
Research (pp. 231–260). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
McDonnell, B. J. (2013). Toward
an integrated typology of causative/applicative
syncretism. Hand-out of a talk given at Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany, October 9,
2013.
McNally, L., & Boleda, G. (2004). Relational
adjectives as properties of
kinds. In O. Bonami & P. Cabredo Hofherr (Eds.), Empirical
Issues in Syntax and Semantics vol. 5
(pp. 179–196). [URL]
McNally, L. (2011). Existential
sentences. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics:
An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning,
vol. 2
(pp. 1829–1848). Berlin, De Gruyter.
McWhorter, J. H. (2011). Tying
up Loose Ends: The Creole Prototype after
all. Diachronica, 28(1), 82–117.
Merlini Barbaresi, L. (2004). Alterazione. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La
formazione delle parole in
italiano (pp. 264–292). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Meyer-Lübke, W. (1911). Romanisches
etymologisches
Wörterbuch. Heidelberg, C. Winter. Available online
at: [URL].
Michaelis, S. M., & Haspelmath, M. (2003). Ditransitive
constructions: Creole languages in a cross-linguistic
perspective. Creolica <[URL]>
Michaelis, S. M., & Marcel, R. (2013). Seychelles
Creole. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), The
survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. II: Portuguese-based,
Spanish-based and French-based
languages (pp. 261–270). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Michaelis, S. M., Maurer, P., Haspelmath, M. & Huber M. (Eds.) (2013). Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
Montaut, A. (2004). Oblique
main arguments in Hindi as localizing predications. Questioning the category
of
subject. In P. Bhaskararao & K. V. Subbarao (Eds.), Non
nominative
subjects (pp. 33–56). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
(2017). Existential
Sentences and Expletive
There. In M. Everaert & H. C. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The
Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition (pp. 1483-1508). Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons. .
Munro, P. (2000). The
Leaky Grammar of the Chickasaw
Applicatives. Chicago Linguistic
Society, 36, 285–310.
Muysken, P. (1981). Halfway
between Quechua and Spanish: The case for
relexification. In A. Highfield & A. Valdman (Eds.), Historicity
and variation in creole
studies (pp. 52–78). Ann Arbor, Karoma.
(1988). Parameters
for serial
verbs. In V. Manfredi (Ed.), Niger-Congo
Syntax and
Semantics, 1, 65–75. Boston, Boston University African Studies Center.
Muysken, P., & Veenstra, T. (1995). Serial
verb
constructions. In J. Arends, P. Muysken & N. Smith (Eds.), Pidgins
and creoles: an
introduction (pp. 289–301). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Muysken, P. (1999). Three
processes of borrowing: Borrowability
revisited. In G. Extra & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Bilingualism
and
Migration (pp. 229–246). Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.
Muysken, P., & Veenstra, T. (2006). Serial
verbs. In M. Everaert & H. C. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The
Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol.
IV (pp. 234–270). Malden, Blackwell.
Myler, N. (2014). Building
and Interpreting Possession
Sentences. PhD Dissertation, New York University.
Naderi, N. (2010). Semantic
and Pragmatics of Grammatical Voice in
Farsi. MA Thesis, Leiden, Leiden University Center for Linguistics (LUCL).
Næss, Å. (2008). Prototypical
transitivity. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Nemati, F. (2013). On
the syntax-semantics of passives in
Persian. In A. Alexiadou, & F. Schäfer, (Eds.), Non-Canonical
Passives (pp. 261–280). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Nikolaeva, I., & Spencer, A. (2013). Possession
and modification: A perspective from Canonical
Typology. In D. Brown, M. Chumakina, & G. Corbett (Eds.), Canonical
morphology and
syntax (pp. 207–238). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Nishina, Y. (2001). Comitative
and Instrumental in Japanese. STUF-Language
Typology and
Universals, 54, 346–364.
Nordlinger, R. (2019). From
body part to applicative: Encoding ‘source’ in
Murrinhpatha. Linguistic
Typology, 23(3), 401–433.
Noyer, R. (1992). Features,
Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological
Structure. PhD Dissertation, MIT.
Ott, D. (2011). Diminutive-formation
in German. Spelling out the Classifier
Analysis. Journal of Comparative Germanic
Linguistics, 14, 1–46.
Oyelaran, O. (1982). On the scope of the serial verb construction in Yoruba. Studies in African Linguistics, 13(2), 109-146.
(2011). Decomposing
Path: The Nanosyntax of Directional
Expressions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Parsons, T. 1979. An
Analysis of Mass Terms and Amount
Terms. In F. J. Pelletier (Ed.), Mass
terms: some philosophical
problems (pp. 137–166). Dordrecht, Springer.
Partee, B. H. (2007). Compositionality
and Coercion in Semantics: The Dynamics of Adjective
Meaning. In G. Bouma, I. Kramer, & J. Zwarts (Eds.), Cognitive
Foundations of
Interpretation (pp. 145–161). Amsterdam, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Peck, S. M. Jr. (1988). Tense,
aspect and mood in Guinea-Casamance Portuguese
Creole. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of California.
Pfänder, S. (2013). Guyanais
structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
Pineda, A. (2014). (In)transitivity
borders. A study of applicatives in Romance languages and
Basque. PhD Dissertation, UAB.
Plank, Frans.
(1995). (Re-)Introducing
Suffixaufnahme. In F. Plank (Ed.), Double
Case. Agreement by
Suffixaufnahme (pp. 3–112). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Post, M. (1995). Fa
d’Ambu. In J. Arends, P. Muysken, & N. Smith (Eds.), Pidgins
and creoles: an
introduction (pp. 191–204). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
(2013). Fa
d’Ambô structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
Rainer, F. (1996). Copernicano
e luterano: sul ruolo del latino nella derivazione deantroponimica
italiana. Lingua
Nostra, 57, 48–49.
Quine, W. (1960). Word and object: An inquiry into the linguistic mechanisms of objective reference. John Wiley.
Rainer, F. (2004). Etnici. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La
formazione delle parole in
italiano (pp. 402–408). Tübingen, Niemeyer.
(2013). Can
relational adjectives really express any relation? An onomasiological
perspective. SKASE Journal of Theoretical
Linguistics, 101, 12–40.
Ricca, D. (2004). Conversione
in
avverbi. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La
formazione delle parole in
italiano (pp. 550–553). Tübingen, Niemeyer.
Rickford, J. R. (1987). Dimensions
of a creole continuum: History, texts, and linguistic analysis of Guyanese
Creole. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.
Rigau, G. (1997). Locative
sentences and related constructions in Catalan: “ésser/haver”
alternation. In A. Mendikoetxea & M. Uribe-Etxebarría (Eds.), Theoretical
Issues at the Morphology- Syntax
Interface (pp. 395–421). Bilbao, Universidad del País Vasco.
Rizzi, L. (1978). A
Restructuring Rule in Italian
Syntax. In S. J. Keyser (Ed.), Recent
Transformational Studies in European
Languages (pp. 113–158). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
(1988). Il
sintagma
preposizionale. In L. Renzi, G. P. Salvi, & A. Cardinaletti (Eds.), Grande
grammatica italiana di
consultazione (pp. 507–531). Bologna, Il Mulino.
Rizzi, L., & Cinque, G. (2016). Functional
Categories and Syntactic Theory. The Annual
Review of
Linguistics, 2, 139–163.
Roberts, S. J., & Bresnan, J. (2008). Retained
inflectional morphology in pidgins: A typological
study. Linguistic
Typology, 12(2), 269–302.
Rohlfs, G. (1969). Grammatica
storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, III. Sintassi e
formazione delle
parole. Torino, Einaudi.
Ross, J. (1967). Constraints
on variables in syntax. PhD. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Roy, I., & Svenonius, P. (2009). Complex
prepositions. In F. Jacques, E. Gilbert, C. Guimier, & M. Krause (Eds.), Autour
de la préposition, Actes du Colloque International de Caen (20–22 septembre
2007) (pp 105–116). Caen, Presses Universitaires de Caen.
Rugna, G., & Franco, L. (2022). Prepositions
as relators in Italian Prepositional
Compounds. In M. Bril, M. Coene, T. Ihsane, P. Sleeman & T. Westveer (Eds.), RLLT
19, Special Issue
of Isogloss. Open
Journal of Romance
Linguistics, 8(5), 11, 1–21.
Samiian, V. (1983). Structure
of phrasal categories in Persian: An X-bar
analysis. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA dissertation.
(1994). The
Ezafe construction: Some implications for the theory of X-bar
syntax. In M. Marashi (Ed.), Persian
Studies in North
America (pp. 17–41). Bethesda, MD, Iranbooks.
Savoia, L. M., Manzini, M. R., Franco, L., & Baldi, B. (2017). Nominal
evaluative suffixes in
Italian. In R. D’Alessandro, G. Iannàccaro, D. Passino, & A. M. Thornton (Eds.), Di
tutti i colori. Studi linguistici per Maria
Grossmann,. avalable
at Leiden University Repository: [URL]
Savoia, L. M., Manzini, M. R., Baldi, B., & Franco, L. (2018). A
Morphosyntactic Analysis of Evaluatives in
Italian. SILTA – Studi Italiani di
Linguistica Teorica e
Applicata, XLVI, 413–440.
Scalise, S. (1990). Constraints
on the Italian suffix
–mente. In W. U. Dressler, H. C. Luschützky, O. E. Pfeiffer, & J. R. Rennison (Eds.), Contemporary
morphology (pp. 87–98). Mouton De Gruyter, Berlin.
Schäfer, F. (2012). Two
types of external argument licensing – the case of
causers. Studia
Linguistica, 66, 128–180.
Schlücker, B. & Ackermann, T. (2017). The
morphosyntax of proper names: an
overview. Folia
Linguistica, 51, 309–333.
Schumann, C. L. (1783). Neger-Englisches
Wörterbuch. Ms. Early creole lexicography: A study of
C.L. Schumann’s manuscript dictionary of
Sranan, ed. by A. Kamp, 44–305.
Schwegler, A. (2013). Palenquero
structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
Sebba, M. (1987). The
Syntax of Serial Verbs: An Investigation into Serialisation in Sranan and
Other
Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Seidl, C. (2004). Deantroponimici. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La
formazione delle parole in
italiano (pp. 411–419). Tübingen, Niemeyer.
Serianni, L. (1988). Grammatica
italiana. Italiano comune e lingua letteraria. Suoni, forme,
costrutti. Torino, Utet.
Seuren, P. (1990). Still
no serials in Seselwa: a reply to “Seselwa serialization and its
significance.” Journal of Pidgin and Creole
Languages, 5, 271–292.
Shibatani, M. & Pardeshi, P. (2002). The
causative
continuum. In M. Shibatani (Ed.), The
Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal
Manipulation (pp. 85–126). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Simoncsics, P. (1998). Kamassian. In D. Abondolo (Ed.), The
Uralic
Languages (pp. 580–601). London: Routledge.
Snyder, William, & Stromswold, K. (1997). The
Structure and Acquisition of English Dative
Constructions. Linguistic
Inquiry, 28(2), 281–317.
Spencer, A., & Nikolaeva, I. (2017). Denominal
adjectives as mixed categories. Word
Structure, 10, 79–99.
Steinkrüger, P. O. (2013). Zamboanga
Chabacano structure
dataset. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (Eds.), Atlas
of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures
Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online
at [URL]).
Stewart, J. M. (1963). Some
restrictions on objects in Twi. Journal of
African
Languages, 2(2), 145–149.
Stolz, T. (2001). To
be with X is to have X: Comitatives, instrumentals, locative, and
predicative
possession. Linguistics, 39(2), 321–350.
Stolz, T., Levkovych, N., & Urdze, A. (2017). Die
Grammatik der Toponyme als typologisches Forschungsfeld: eine
Pilotstudie. In J. Helmbrecht, D. Nübling & B. Schlücker (Eds.), Namengrammatik, 121–146. Hamburg, Buske.
Stump, G. (2001). Inflectional
morphology: A theory of paradigm
structure. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
(2002). Morphological
and syntactic paradigms: Arguments for a theory of paradigm
linkage. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook
of
Morphology 2001, 147–180. Dordrecht, Kluwer.
Sun, C. (1996). Word
order change and grammaticalization in the history of
Chinese. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.
Suñer M. (1982). Syntax and Semantics of Spanish Presentational Sentence-Types. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Suutari, T. (2006). Body
part names and
grammaticalization. In M-L. Helasvuo & L. Campbell (Eds.), Grammar
from the human perspective: Case, space and person in
Finnish (pp. 101–128). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Svenonius, P. (2002). Icelandic
case and the structure of events. Journal of
Comparative Germanic
Linguistics, 5(1–3), 197–225.
(2007). Adpositions,
particles and the arguments they
introduce. In E. Reuland, T, Bhattacharya, & G. Spathas (Eds.), Argument
Structure (pp. 63–103). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
(2008). Projections
of P. In A. Asbury, J. Dotlačil, B. Gehrke & R. Nouwen (Eds.), Syntax
and Semantics of Spatial
P (pp. 63–84). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
(2010). Spatial
P in
English. In G. Cinque & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping
Spatial PPs, The Cartography of Syntactic Structures,
Vol. 6
(pp. 127–160). New York, Oxford University Press.
(2012). Structural
decomposition of spatial
adpositions. Presented at The Meaning of P, Universität Bochum. [URL].
Swolkien de Sousa, D. (2012). The
Cape Verdean Creole of São Vicente: its genesis and
structure. Ph.D Dissertation, University of Coimbra.
Syea, A. (2013). Serial
verb constructions in Indian Ocean French Creoles (IOCs) Substrate,
universal, or an independent diachronic
development? Journal of Pidgin and Creole
Languages, 28(1), 13–64.
Tai, J. H.-Y. (1985). Temporal
sequence and Chinese word
order. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity
in
Syntax (pp. 49–72). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Takamine, K. (2017). Putting
Adpositions in
Place. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization
patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3: grammatical categories and the lexicon, (pp. 57-149) Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
(1988). The
relation of grammar to
cognition. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics
in cognitive
linguistics (pp. 165–205). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
(2000). Toward
a cognitive semantics. Concept structuring systems, Vol.
1. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Todd, L. (1982). Cameroon. Heidelberg, Julius Groos Verlag.
Torrego, E. (2010). Variability
in the Case Patterns of Causative Formation in Romance and Its
Implications. Linguistic
Inquiry, 41, 445–470.
Tortora, C. (2005). The
Preposition’s Preposition in Italian: Evidence for Boundedness of
Space. In R. Gess, & E. Rubin (Eds), Theoretical
and Experimental Approaches to Romance
Linguistics (pp. 307–327). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Ursini, F-A., & Long, H. (2018). On
spatial nouns and adpositions in
Mandarin. Language and
Linguistics, 81, 193–226.
Vainikka, A. (1989). Deriving
Syntactic Representations in
Finnish. PhD dissertation, University of
Massachusetts/Amherst.
van Hout, A., & Roeper, T. (1998). Events
and aspectual structure in derivational
morphology. In H. Harley (Ed.), Papers
from the UPenn/MIT roundtable on argument structure and
aspect (pp. 175–200). MITWPL32.
van Pareren, R. (2013). Body
part terms as a semantic basis for grammaticalization: a Mordvin case study
into spatial reference and beyond. Language
Sciences, 36, 90–102.
van Riemsdijk, H. (1978). A
case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional
phrases. Lisse, The Peter de Ridder Press.
Veenstra, T. & den Besten, H. (1994). Fronting. In J. Arends, P. Muysken & N. Smith (Eds.), Pidgins
and creoles: an
introduction (pp. 303–315). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Veland, R. (2012). Le
locuzioni preposizionali a(d) opera di, per opera di, per mano di in
italiano contemporaneo: funzionamento sintattico e proprietà
semantiche. Zeitschrift für romanische
Philologie, 128, 537–552.
Viitso, T-R. (1998). Estonian. In D. Abondolo (Ed.), The
Uralic
Languages (pp. 115–148). London, Routledge.
Villalba, X. (2013). Eventive
existentials in Catalan and the topic-focus
articulation. Italian Journal of
Linguistics/Rivista di
Linguistica, 25(1), 147–173.
Von Fintel, K. (1994). Restrictions
on quantifier domains. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachussets.
von Heusinger, K., & Kaiser, G. A. (2011). Affectedness
and differential object marking in
Spanish. Morphology, 21(3–4), 593–617.
Wälchli, B., & Zúñiga, F. (2006). Source-Goal
(in)difference and the typology of motion events in the
clause. Sprachtypologie &
Universalienforschung, 59, 284–303.
Wandruszka, U. (2004). Aggettivi
di
relazione. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La
formazione delle parole in
italiano (pp. 382–394). Tübingen, Niemeyer.
Wiltschko, M. (2006). Why
should diminutives
count? In H. Broekhuis, N. Corver, Norbert, R. Huijbregts, U. Kleinhenz, & J. Koster (Eds.), Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk (pp. 669–679). Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.
Windfuhr, G., & Perry, J. J. (2009). Persian
and Tajik. In G. Windfuhr (Ed.), The
Iranian
Languages (pp. 416–444). London, Routledge.
Winford, D. & Migge, B. (2008). Surinamese
Creole: Morphology and
syntax. In Edgar W. Schneider (Ed.), Varieties
of English, Vol. 2: The Americas and the
Caribbean (pp. 693–731). Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.
Wood, J. & Marantz, A. (2018). The
Interpretation of External Arguments. <[URL]
Woolford, E. (1997). Four-way
Case systems: Ergative, nominative, objective, and
accusative. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory, 15, 181–227.
Yamada, M. (2010). Plurality,
reciprocity, and plurality of
reciprocity. PhD Dissertation, University of Delaware.
Ylikoski J. (2011). A
Survey of the Origins of Directional Case Suffixes in European
Uralic. In S. Kittilä, K. Västi, & J. Ylikoski (Eds.), Case,
Animacy and Semantic
Roles (pp. 235–280). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Ziegeler, D. P. (2000). A
Possession-Based Analysis of the Ba-construction in
Mandarin
Chinese. Lingua, 110, 807–842.
Zwarts, J. (1995). Lexical
and Functional Direction in
Dutch. In M. den Dikken, & Kees Hengeveld (Eds.), Linguistics
in the Netherlands, 12
(pp. 227–238). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.