Cover not available

In:Competition in Word-Formation
Edited by Alexandra Bagasheva, Akiko Nagano and Vincent Renner
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 284] 2024
► pp. 247–274

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 8
A diachronic perspective on competition in denominal verb formation in Italian

ORCiD logo with link | University of Salerno
ORCiD logo with link | University of Salerno
Published online: 8 May 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.284.08iac
Abstract
Three derivational processes compete in the formation of Italian denominal verbs: suffixation, conversion and parasynthesis. The rivalry between these processes goes back to the early history of the Italian language. Based on the analysis of an original dataset, this chapter aims to offer a comprehensive overview of denominal verb formation in Italian from a diachronic perspective. The results of a macro-level analysis concern the availability of nouns to form verbs, the distribution of the competing verbalising processes over different diachronic stages, a comparative overview of the meanings encoded by each process, and the competition between synonymous verbs formed by means of different processes from a same noun. A micro-level analysis outlines the productivity of the specific derivational means expressing each process. The data suggest a higher differentiation of the processes over time, along with their enduring vitality, a decreased abundance of verbs derived from the same noun, and a recent growth in the employment of suffixation, which, however, does not coincide with a significant decline in the resort to either of the other two processes.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Dataset
  • 3.How nouns surface as verbs in Italian
    • 3.1Denominal verbs: Derivational properties
    • 3.2Denominal verbs: Semantic properties
      • 3.2.1‘be (like a) n’
      • 3.2.2‘(make) become (like a) n’
      • 3.2.3‘make n’
        • 3.2.3.1‘make [put, cover oneself in, produce, develop, etc.] n’
        • 3.2.3.2‘make (undergo) [provoke, arouse, cause to acquire, etc.] n’
        • 3.2.3.3‘(cause to) become [bring together, arrange, etc.] a n’
        • 3.2.3.4‘(cause to) become [divide, break into, etc.] n’
      • 3.2.4‘to have [to be in, feel, show, etc.] n’
      • 3.2.5Spatial meanings
        • 3.3.5.1Locatum
        • 3.2.5.2Location
      • 3.2.6Instrumental meanings
      • 3.2.7Weather verbs
      • 3.2.8Mapping between derivational processes and semantic types
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Base nouns and verbal derivation: Quantitative aspects
    • 4.2Verb derivatives
      • 4.2.1Diachronic distribution and competition at a macro-level
      • 4.2.2Diachronic distribution and competition at a micro-level
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (36)
References
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Competition and the lexicon. In Livelli di analisi e fenomeni di interfaccia: Atti del XLVII congresso internazionale della società di linguistica italiana, Annibale Elia, Claudio Iacobini & Miriam Voghera (eds), 39–52. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Competitors and alternants in linguistic morphology. In Competition in Inflection and Word Formation, Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), 39–66. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023. Three ways of looking at morphological rivalry. Word Structure, 16(1): 49–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. & Clark, Herbert H. 1979. When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55(4): 767–811. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Achille, Paolo & Grossmann, Maria (eds). 2017. Per la storia della formazione delle parole in italiano: un nuovo corpus in rete (MIDIA) e nuove prospettive di studio. Florence: Franco Cesati.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio. 1980. Guida all’uso delle parole. Rome: Editori Riuniti.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Storia linguistica dell’Italia repubblicana dal 1946 ai nostri giorni. Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Thornton, Anna Maria. 1991. Doppie basi e binarismo nella morfologia italiana. Rivista di Linguistica 3(1): 3–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fabrizio, Claudia. 2013. The meaning of a noun converted into a verb: A semantic exploration on Italian. Rivista di Linguistica 25(2): 175–219.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fally, Irene & Goryczka, Pamela. 2021. Quid manet? A diachronic approach to the Italian derivational suffixes ‑izzare and ‑eggiare. Lingue e linguaggio 20(1): 57–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gause, Georgy F. 1934. The Struggle for Existence. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
GDLI = Battaglia, Salvatore (ed). 1961–2009. Grande dizionario della lingua italiana. Turin: Utet. [URL]
GRADIT = Tullio De Mauro (ed). 1999–2007. Grande dizionario italiano dell’uso. Turin: Utet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grossmann, Maria. 2004a. Verbi denominali. In La formazione delle parole in italiano, Maria Grossmann & Franz Rainer (eds), 450–459. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004b. Conversione in verbi. In La formazione delle parole in italiano, Maria Grossmann & Franz Rainer (eds), 534–546. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grossmann, Maria & Rainer, Franz (eds). 2004. La formazione delle parole in italiano. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grossmann, Maria & Iacobini, Claudio. 2022. Concorrenza tra parasintesi, suffissazione e conversione nella storia dell’italiano: la formazione dei verbi deaggettivali. Paper presented at the XXXème Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes, La Laguna, 4–9 July.
Huyghe, Richard & Varvara, Rossella. 2023. Affix rivalry: Theoretical and methodological challenges. Word Structure 16: 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iacobini, Claudio. 2004. Parasintesi. In La formazione delle parole in italiano, Maria Grossmann & Franz Rainer (eds), 167–188. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Les verbes parasynthétiques: de l’expression de l’espace à l’expression de l’action. De Lingua Latina 3: 1–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Parasynthesis in morphology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Mark Aronoff (ed-in-chief), 1–20. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iacobini, Claudio & Thornton, Anna Maria. 1992. Tendenze nella formazione delle parole nell'italiano del ventesimo secolo. In Linee di tendenza dell'italiano con­temporaneo, Lugano 19-21 settembre 1991: Atti del XXV Congresso Internazionale di Studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana, Bruno Moretti, Dario Petrini & Sandro Bianconi (eds.), 25–55. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov. 1941. Atristar-entristecer: Adjectival verbs in Spanish, Portuguese, and Catalan. Studies in Philology 38: 429–461.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melloni, Chiara & Dal Maso, Serena. 2022. For a topology of derivational paradigms. In Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and Applications, Cristina Fernández-Alcaina, Alba E. Ruz & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 21–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peša Matracki, Ivica. 2006. Linee di tendenza nella formazione delle parole nell’italiano contemporaneo. Studia Romanica et Anglica Zagrabiensia 51: 103–146.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz. 1988. Towards a theory of blocking: The case of Italian and German quality nouns. In Yearbook of Morphology 1988, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 155–185. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Morphological metaphysics: Virtual, potential, and actual words. Word Structure 5(2): 165–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thornton, Anna Maria, Iacobini, Claudio & Burani, Cristina. 1997. BDVDB: Una base di dati sul vocabolario di base della lingua italiana. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valera, Salvador. 2020. Semantic patterns in noun-to-verb conversion in English. In Complex Words: Advances in Morphology, Livia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 311–334. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Villalva, Alina. 2022. Complex verbs: The interplay of suffixation, conversion, and parasynthesis in Portuguese and English. In Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and Applications, Alba E. Ruz, Cristina Fernández-Alcaina & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 249–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue