In:Competition in Word-Formation
Edited by Alexandra Bagasheva, Akiko Nagano and Vincent Renner
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 284] 2024
► pp. 208–246
Chapter 7Competition between affixation and conversion in Present-Day
English denominal verbs
Published online: 8 May 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.284.07deb
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.284.07deb
Abstract
This study investigates the competition between
conversion and affixation in forming denominal verbs (to
pixel / to
pixelate, to
glass / to
glassify, to
acronym / to
acronymize) in a dataset of 588
verbs first attested since 1950 and collected from the Oxford
English Dictionary and the Corpus of
Contemporary American English. The morphophonological
analysis of the inputs reveals constraints preventing the formation
of doublets, while the semantic analysis of the outputs shows how
conversion and affixation are used for the expression of different
semantic categories, thus limiting the number of semantic
competitors. We argue that the tension between economy of expression
and transparency of meaning is resolved by each verb-forming process
specialising in distinct niches. Our analyses thus reveal some
complementary distribution between conversion and affixation: each
process tends to select different types of inputs and tends to
convey different meanings.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Conversion and affixation in Present-Day English
- 2.1Noun-to-verb conversion
- 2.1.1Definition of conversion and delimitation of its scope
- 2.1.2Semantic specifications of conversion
- 2.2Noun-to-verb affixation
- 2.2.1Prefixation
- 2.2.2Suffixation
- 2.1Noun-to-verb conversion
- 3.Competition between conversion and affixation
- 3.1Competition on a formal level
- 3.1.1Definition of formal competition
- 3.1.2Competition within the onomasiological approach
- 3.2Competition on a semantic level
- 3.2.1Definition of semantic competition
- 3.2.2The issue of synonymy
- 3.3The resolution of competition
- 3.4Previous studies on morphological competition
- 3.1Competition on a formal level
- 4.Hypotheses and methodology
- 4.1Hypothesis and aims of this study
- 4.2Data selection
- 4.2.1Dictionary data
- 4.2.2Corpus data
- 4.2.3Collecting formal doublets
- 5.Results and discussion
- 5.1Morphological and etymological features of the base
nouns
- 5.1.1Etymology and origin of the simplex inputs
- 5.1.2Morphological analysis of the complex inputs
- 5.2Phonological features of the base nouns
- 5.2.1Number of syllables
- 5.2.2Vowel versus consonant phonemic ending
- 5.3Semantic analysis of the denominal verbs
- 5.3.1Verbal semantics categories
- 5.3.2The semantics of converted and affixed verbs
- 5.3.3The semantics of doublets
- 5.3.4Semantic competition in doublets
- 5.1Morphological and etymological features of the base
nouns
- 6.Conclusion
Notes References
References (43)
Algeo, John. 1991. Fifty
Years Among the New Words: A Dictionary of Neologisms
1941–1991. Cambridge: CUP.
. 2016. Competition
and the
lexicon. In Livelli
di Analisi e fenomeni di interfaccia. Atti del XLVII
congresso internazionale della società di linguistica
Italiana, Annibale Elia, Claudio Iacobini & Miriam Voghera (eds), 39–52. Roma: Bulzoni Editore.
. 2019. Competitors
and alternants in linguistic
morphology. In Competition
in Inflection and Word
Formation, Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), 39–66. Cham: Springer.
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The
Oxford Reference Guide to English
Morphology. Oxford: OUP.
Booij, Geert. 2007. The
Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Linguistic
Morphology. 2nd
edition. Oxford: OUP.
Crystal, David. 2019. The
Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English
Language, 3rd
edition. Cambridge: CUP.
Davis, Mark. 2008–. The
Corpus of American English
(COCA). Available online
at [URL]
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2014. Making
New Words: Morphological Derivation in
English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fernández-Alcaina, Cristina. 2017. Availability
and unavailability in English
word-formation. In Competing
Patterns in English
Affixation, Juan Santana-Lario & Salvador Valera (eds), 163–205. Bern: Peter Lang.
. 2021. Competition
in the Derivational Paradigm of English
Verbs. PhD
dissertation, University of Granada.
Fernández-Alcaina, Cristina & Čermák, Jan. 2018. Derivational
paradigms and competition in English: A diachronic study on
competing causative verbs and their
derivatives. SKASE Journal of
Theoretical
Linguistics 15(3): 69–98.
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús. 2017. Methodological
and procedural issues in the quantification of morphological
competition. In Competing
Patterns in English
Affixation, Juan Santana-Lario & Salvador Valera (eds), 67–117. Bern: Peter Lang.
Gardani, Francesco, Rainer, Franz & Luschützky, Hans Christian. 2019. Competition in morphology: A historical outline. In Competition
in Inflection and
Word-Formation, Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), 3–38. Cham: Springer.
Geeraerts, Dirk. 1997. Diachronic
Prototype Semantics: A Contribution to Historical
Lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gottfurcht, Carolyn A. 2008. Denominal
Verb Formation in
English. PhD
dissertation, Northwestern University.
Guzmán Naranjo, Matías and Olivier Bonami. 2023. A
distributional assessment of rivalry in word
formation. Word
Structure 16(1): 87–114.
Haspelmath, Martin & Sims, Andrea. 2010. Understanding
Morphology, 2nd
edition. London: Hodder Education.
Huyghe, Richard & Varvara, Rossella. 2023. Affix
rivalry: Theoretical and methodological
challenges. Word
Structure 16(1): 1–23.
Kastovsky, Dieter. 2005. Conversion
and/or zero: Word-formation theory, historical linguistics,
and
typology. In Approaches
to Conversion /
Zero-Derivation, Laurie Bauer & Salvador Valera (eds), 7–17. Münster: Waxmann.
. 2005. English
word-formation processes: Observations, issues, and thoughts
on future
research. In Handbook
of Word-Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 375–427. Dordrecht: Springer.
Lindsay, Mark. 2012. Rival
suffixes: Synonymy, competition, and the emergence of
productivity. In Morphology
and the Architecture of Grammar: On-Line Proceedings of the
8th Mediterranean Morphology
Meeting, Angela Ralli, Geert Booij, Sergio Scalise & Athanasios Karasimos (eds), 192–203. Rio: University of Patras.
Lindsay, Mark & Aronoff, Mark. 2013. Natural
selection in self-organizing morphological
systems. In Morphology
in Toulouse, Selected Proceedings of Décembrettes
7, Nabil Hathout, Fabio Montermini & Jesse Tseng (eds), 133–153. Munich: Lincom.
Marchand, Hans. 1969. The
Categories and Types of Present-Day English
Word-Formation. 2nd revised
edition. München: C.H. Bech.
Martsa, Sándor. 2013. Conversion
in English: A Cognitive Semantic
Approach. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Nagano, Akiko. 2008. Conversion
and Back-Formation in English: Toward a Theory of
Morpheme-Based
Morphology. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
OED
Online. OUP. Available
online at [URL]
Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological
Productivity: Structural Constraints in English
Derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Plag, Ingo, Andreou, Marios & Kawaletz, Lea. 2018. A
frame-semantic approach to polysemy in
affixation. In The
Lexeme in Descriptive and Theoretical
Morphology, Olivier Bonami, Gilles Boyé, Georgette Dal, Hélène Giraudo & Fiammetta Namer (eds), 467–486. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Renner, Vincent. 2020. An
ecosystem view of English
word-formation. The Mental
Lexicon. 15(1): 4–20.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2016. English
Morphology and Word-Formation: An
Introduction, 3rd
edition. Berlin: Schmidt.
Štekauer, Pavol. 2005. Onomasiological
approach to
word-formation. In Handbook
of Word-Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 207–232. Dordrecht: Springer.
. 2017. Competition
in natural
languages. In Competing
Patterns in English
Affixation, Juan Santana-Lario & Salvador Valera (eds), 15–31. Bern: Peter Lang.
Tribout, Delphine. 2010. Les
conversions de nom à verbe et de verbe à nom en
français. PhD
dissertation, Paris Diderot University.
