Cover not available

In:Competition in Word-Formation
Edited by Alexandra Bagasheva, Akiko Nagano and Vincent Renner
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 284] 2024
► pp. 72–103

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 3
Actional nominalization in Present-Day English in the light of the Referenced Index of Competition

ORCiD logo with link | University of Granada
Published online: 8 May 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.284.03fer
Abstract
The suffix ‑ment is a nominalizer which has been portrayed as practically “defunct” (Anshen & Aronoff 1999: 24), although recent coinages cast doubts on conclusive statements (Bauer et al. 2013). This investigation is based on nonce formations from the BNC and COCA and aims at exploring nominalizations which compete for the meaning action in order to understand the current degree of productivity of the processes involved. This is done through a corpus-based quantitative approach which considers ‑ment in the light of its relationship to other competitors, e.g. ‑ing or conversion. The results reveal that ‑ment is normally surpassed by other processes, but also that it has found a niche of application which secures a minimal productive status.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method
  • 3.Competition, productivity and nominalization
    • 3.1Morphological competition
    • 3.2The synchronic status of -ment
  • 4.The environment of competition in English nominalization
    • 4.1The Referenced Index of Competition
    • 4.2An assessment of cluster competition through C*
    • 4.3General trends and particularities
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (87)
References
Anshen, Frank & Aronoff, Mark. 1988. Producing morphologically complex words. Linguistics 26: 641–655. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Using dictionaries to study the mental lexicon. Brain and Language 68: 16–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arndt-Lappe, Sabine. 2014. Analogy in suffix rivalry: The case of English ‑ity and ‑ness. English Language and Linguistics 18(3): 497–548. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Competition and the lexicon. In Livelli di Analisi e Fenomeni di Interfaccia. Atti del XLVII Congresso Internazionale di Studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana, Annibale Elia, Claudio Iacobini & Miriam Voghera (eds), 39–52. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Competitors and alternants in linguistic morphology. In Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation, Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), 39–66. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark & Cho, Sungeun. 2001. The semantics of ‑ship suffixation. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 167–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark & Lindsay, Mark. 2014. Productivity, blocking, and lexicalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 67–83. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald. 1992. Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1991, Geert E. Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 109–149. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 899–919. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, & Lieber, Rochelle. 1991. Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics 29(5): 801–843. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald & Renouf, Antoinette. 1996. Chronicling The Times: Productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. Language 72: 69–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baeskow, Heike. 2010. His Lordship’s ‑ship and the King of Golfdom. Against a purely functional analysis of suffixhood. Word Structure 3(1): 11–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. -Ness and ‑ity: Phonological exponents of n or meaningful nominalizers of different adjectival domains? Journal of English Linguistics 40(1): 6–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Productivity: Theories. In Handbook of Word-Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 315–334. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Competition in English word-formation. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 177–198. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. The importance of marginal productivity. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 12(1): 72–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Rethinking Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Valera, Salvador & Díaz-Negrillo, Ana. 2010. Affixation vs conversion: The resolution of conflicting patterns. In Variation and Change in Morphology: Selected Papers from the 13th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2008, Franz Rainer, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), 15–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berg, Kristian. 2020. Changes in the productivity of word-formation patterns: Some methodological remarks. Linguistics 58(4): 1117–1150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rose nbaum (eds), 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbin, Danielle. 1987. Morphologie Dérivationnelle et Structuration du Lexique, 2 vols. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowie, Claire & Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 2002. Diachronic word-formation and studying changes in productivity over time: Theoretical and methodological considerations. In A Changing World of Words: Studies in English Historical Lexicography, Lexicology and Semantics, Javier E. Díaz Vera (ed), 410–437. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2004. British National Corpus (from OUP). 〈[URL]〉 (11 July 2022).
. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). 〈[URL]〉 (11 July 2022).
Dokulil, Miloš. 1968. Zur Theorie der Wortbildung. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Karl-Marx-Universität Leipzig, Gesellschafts‑ und Sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe 17: 203–211.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fabb, Nigel. 1988. English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6(4): 527–539. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández-Alcaina, Cristina. 2021. The Competition of Word-Formation Processes in the Derivational Paradigm of Verbs. Berlin: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús. 2017. Methodological and procedural issues in the quantification of morphological competition. In Competing Patterns in English Affixation, Juan Santana-Lario & Salvador Valera (eds), 67–117. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fill, Alwin. 1980. Wortdurchsichtigkeit im Englischen. Eine nicht-generative Studie morphosemantischer Strukturen. Mit einer kontrastiven Untersuchung der Rolle durchsichtiger Wörter im Englischen und Deutschen der Gegenwart. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fradin, Bernard. 2019. Competition in derivation: What can we learn from French doublets in ‑age and ‑ment? In Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation, Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), 67–93. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaeta, Livio & Ricca, Davide. 2006. Productivity in Italian word-formation: A variable-corpus approach. Linguistics 44(1): 57–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gause, Georgij Frantsevich. 1934. The Struggle for Existence. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J. 2001. Synonymy blocking and the elsewhere condition: Lexical morphology and the speaker. Transactions of the Philological Society 99(1): 65–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guz, Wojciech. 2009. English affixal nominalizations across language registers. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 45(4): 447–471. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Klaus. 1977. Gegenstand und Beschreibungsaspekte der Wortbildungslehre (am Beispiel des Englischen). Linguistische Studien 36: 37–68. Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften, ZIS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heyvaert, Liesbet. 2001. Deverbal -er suffixation as morphological equivalent of the clausal subject-finite unit. Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium. Preprint 176.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hohenhaus, Peter. 2005. Lexicalization and institutionalization. In Handbook of Word-Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 353–373. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter. 1986. The problem of productivity in word formation. Linguistics 24: 585–600. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Hans Marchand and the Marchandeans. In Handbook of Word-Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 99–124. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaunisto, Mark. 2007. Variation and Change in the Lexicon: A Corpus-based Analysis of Adjectives in English Ending in -ic and -ical. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. The rivalry between English adjectives ending in ‑ive and ‑ory. In Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on New Approaches in English Historical Lexis (HEL-LEX 2), Roderick W. McConchie, Alpo Honkapohja & Jukka Tyrkkö (eds), 74–87. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kawaletz, Lea. 2023. The Semantics of English -ment Nominalizations. Berlin: Language Science Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kawaletz, Lea & Plag, Ingo. 2015. Predicting the semantics of English nominalizations: A frame-based analysis of ‑ment suffixation. In Semantics of Complex Words, Laurie Bauer, Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 289–319. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical morphology and phonology. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm: Selected Papers from SICOL-1981, The Linguistics Society of Korea, 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran. 2001. Why weaken but not *strongen? On deadjectival verbs. English Studies 82(2): 154–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lapesa, Gabriella, Kawaletz, Lea, Plag, Ingo, Andreou, Marios, Kisselew, Max & Padó, Sebastian. 2018. Disambiguation of newly derived nominalizations in context: A distributional semantics approach. Word Structure 11(3): 277–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lara-Clares, Cristina. 2017. Competition in Present Day English nominalization by zero-affixation vs. ‑ation. In Competing Patterns in English Affixation, Juan Santana-Lario & Salvador Valera (eds), 207–244. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lees, Robert. 1960. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne. 1995. Prefixes in English word formation. Folia Linguistica 29(1–2): 133–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. English word-formation processes. Observations, issues, and thoughts on future research. In Handbook of Word-Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 375–427. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Methodological issues in studying derivation. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 84–94. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. English Nouns: The Ecology of Nominalization. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindsay, Mark. 2012. Rival suffixes: Synonymy, competition, and the emergence of productivity. In Morphology and the Architecture of Grammar: On-line Proceedings of the 8th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM8), Angela Ralli, Geert E. Booij, Sergio Scalise & Athanasios Karasimos (eds), 192–203. Patras: University of Patras. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindsay, Mark & Aronoff, Mark. 2013. Natural selection in self-organizing morphological systems. In Morphology in Toulouse: Selected Proceedings of Décembrettes 7, Nabil Hatout, Fabio Montermini & Jesse Tseng (eds), 133–153. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lipka, Leonhard. 1992. An Outline of English Lexicology. Lexical Structure, Word Semantics, and Word-Formation. Second edition. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lipka, Leonhard, Handl, Susanne & Falkner, Wolfgang. 2004. Lexicalization & institutionalization. The state of the art in 2004. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 1(1): 2–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marchand, Hans. 1955. Synchronic analysis and word-formation. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 13: 7–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach. Second edition. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melloni, Chiara. 2007. Polysemy in Word Formation: The Case of Deverbal Nominals. PhD dissertation, University of Verona.
. 2011. Event and Result Nominals: A Morpho-Semantic Approach. Bern: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Naya, Ryohei. 2017. Competition in word-formation: Deverbal nominalization by ‑ment vs. conversion. JELS 34: 271–277.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neuhaus, Heinz J. 1973. Zur Theorie der Produktivität von Wortbildungssystemen. In Linguistische Perspektiven: Referate des VII. Linguistischen Kolloquiums, Abraham P. ten Cate & Peter Jordens (eds), 305–317. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Chris C. 2015. Measuring productivity diachronically: Nominal suffixes in English letters, 1400–1600. English Language and Linguistics 19(1): 107–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. On the mechanisms of morphological rivalry: A new look at competing verb-deriving affixes in English. In Anglistentag 1999 Mainz Proceedings, Bernhard Reitz & Sigrid Rieuwerts (eds), 63–76. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Word-Formation in English. Second edition. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo, Kawaletz, Lea, Arndt-Lappe, Sabine & Lieber, Rochelle. 2023. Analogical modeling of derivational semantics: Two case studies. In The Semantics of Derivational Morphology, Sven Kotowski & Ingo Plag (eds), 104–141. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Proffitt, Michael. 2019. The Oxford English Dictionary. 〈[URL]〉 (25 August 2022).
Rainer, Franz. 2016. Blocking. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Mark Aronoff (ed-in-chief), 1–19. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renner, Vincent. 2020. An ecosystem view of word-formation. The Mental Lexicon 15(1): 4–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riddle, Elizabeth M. 1985. A historical perspective on the productivity of the suffixes ‑ness and ‑ity. In Historical Semantics: Historical Word-Formation, Jacek Fisiak (ed), 435–461. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1985. Variability in word formation patterns and productivity in the history of English. In Papers from the 6th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Jacek Fisiak (ed), 451–465. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryder, Mary Ellen. 1999. Bankers and blue-chippers: An account of ‑er formations in present-day English. English Language and Linguistics 3: 269–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scherer, Carmen. 2015. Change in productivity. In Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), vol. 3, 1781–1793. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Viktoria, Kawaletz, Lea & Kotowski, Sven. In preparation. Eventualities in nominalization semantics: The case of denominal ‑ment-formations.
Spencer, Andrew. 2019. The nature of productivity (including word formation versus creative coining). In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Mark Aronoff (ed-in-chief), 1–27. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Compounding from an onomasiological perspective. In The Semantics of Compounding, Pius ten Hacken (ed), 54–68. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Competition in natural languages. In Competing Patterns in English Affixation, Juan Santana-Lario & Salvador Valera (eds), 15–32. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol, Chapman, Don, Tomaščíková, Slávka & Franko, Štefan. 2005. Word-formation as creativity within productivity constraints. Sociolinguistic evidence. Onomasiology Online 6: 1–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trips, Carola. 2009. Lexical Semantics and Diachronic Morphology. The Development of -hood, -dom and -ship in the History of English. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Marle, Jaap. 1988. On the role of semantics in productivity change. In Yearbook of Morphology 1988, Geert E. Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 139–154. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue