Cover not available

In:Differential Object Marking in Romance: Towards microvariation
Edited by Monica Alexandrina Irimia and Alexandru Mardale
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 280] 2023
► pp. 253266

References (25)
References
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21(3), 435–483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benincà, P. (2010). L’ordine delle parole e la struttura della frase. In G. Salvi & L. Renzi (Eds.), Grammatica dell’italiano antico (Vol. I., pp. 27–59). Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boeddu, D. (2020). The differential object marking of the Arborense dialect of Sardinian in language contact setting. In A. Mardale & P. Karatsareas (Eds.), Differential object marking and language contact. Special issue of Journal of Language Contact, 13(1), 17–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bossong, G. (1982). Der Präpositionale Akkusativ im Sardischen. In O. Winkelmann & M. Braisch (Eds.), Festschrift Johannes Hubschumid zum 65. Geburstag (pp. 579–599). Francke.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In D. Wanner & D. A. Kibbee (Eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics. Selected papers from the XVIII Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Urbana-Champaign, April 7–9, 1988 (pp. 143–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Le marquage différentiel de l’object. In J. Feullet (Ed.), Actance et valence dans les langues de l’Europe (pp. 193–258). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cappellaro, C. (2016). Tonic pronominal system: Morphophonology. In A. Ledgeway & M. Maiden (Eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages (pp. 722–740). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cennamo, M., Ciconte, F. M., & Andriani, L. (this volume). Syntactic and semantic constraints on differential object marking in Old Sardinian.
Corbett, G. G. (2000). Number. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2003). Typology and Universals (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö., & Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (2001). Kinship in grammar. In I. Baron, M. Herslund, & F. Sørensen (Eds.), Dimensions of possession (pp. 201–226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heusinger, K. von, & Chiriacescu, S. (2013). The discourse structuring potential of differential object marking, the case of indefinite and definite direct objects in Romanian. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, 58, 439–456.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, M. A. (1995). The prepositional accusative in Sardinian: Its distribution and syntactic repercussions. In J. C. Smith & M. Maiden (Eds.), Linguistic theory and the Romance languages (pp. 37–75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Sintassi della lingua sarda. Condaghes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanazawa, Y. (2018). A typological analysis of differential object marking in Old Sardinian. In M. G. Martínez, M. C. Moral del Hoyo, & J. T. Williams Camus (Eds.), Aplicaciones de la lingüística de corpus al estudio de lenguas modernas (pp. 101–112). Real Sociedad Menéndez Pelayo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López, L. (2016). (In)definiteness, specificity, and differential object marking. In S. Fischer & C. Gabriel (Eds.), Manual of grammatical interfaces in Romance (pp. 241–265). Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neuberger, K. A., & Stark, E. (2014). Differential object marking in Corsican: Regularities and triggering factors. Linguistics, 52(2), 365–389. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Putzu, I. (2005). Introduction. In I. Putzu (Ed.) Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 58(2–3), 151–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Per uno studio dell’accusativo preposizionale in sardo antico: Emergenze dallo spoglio del Condaghe di San Pietro di Silki. In R. Lazzeroni, E. Banfi, G. Bernini, M. Chini, & G. Marotta (Eds.), Diachronica et synchronica. Studi in onore di Anna Giacalone Ramat. (pp. 397–428). Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohlfs, G. (1972). Autour de l’accusatif prepositionnel dans les langues romanes. Revue de Linguistique Romane, 35, 312–334.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salvi, G. (2000). La formazione del sistema V2 delle lingue romanze antiche. Lingua e Stile, 35(4), 665–692.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soddu, A., & Strinna, G. (Eds.). (2013). Il Condaghe di San Pietro di Silki. Ilisso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (1998). The dependencies of objects. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Virdis, M. (Ed.) (2003). Il condaghe di Santa Maria di Bonarcado. Ilisso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue