In:Differential Object Marking in Romance: Towards microvariation
Edited by Monica Alexandrina Irimia and Alexandru Mardale
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 280] 2023
► pp. 253–266
Differential object marking in kinship terms and animacy hierarchies in Old Sardinian
Published online: 27 November 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.280.10kan
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.280.10kan
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to illustrate the
characteristics of Differential Object Marking (DOM) in kinship
terms in Condaghe di San Pietro di Silki written in
Logudorese Sardinian, and to demonstrate that the animacy hierarchy which
governs the occurrence of DOM varies depending on the grammatical
number of the direct object. In singular numbers, kinship terms are
distinguished from animate common nouns in relation to the occurrence of
DOM. On the other hand, in plural numbers, kinship terms and
animate common nouns are not distinguished from each other as regards the
occurrence of DOM. To conclude, we will structure animacy
hierarchies regarding the occurrence of DOM and of the definite
article.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous studies on DOM in Sardinian
- 3.DOM with singular nouns
- 4.DOM with plural nouns
- 5.Analysis
- 5.1Singular vs plural in the animacy hierarchy
- 5.2Parallel distribution of DOM in other Romance languages
- 6.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes Abbreviations References
References (25)
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential
object marking: Iconicity vs.
economy. Natural Language and
Linguistic
Theory, 21(3), 435–483.
Benincà, P. (2010). L’ordine
delle parole e la struttura della
frase. In G. Salvi & L. Renzi (Eds.), Grammatica
dell’italiano
antico (Vol. I., pp. 27–59). Il Mulino.
Boeddu, D. (2020). The
differential object marking of the Arborense dialect of Sardinian in
language contact
setting. In A. Mardale & P. Karatsareas (Eds.), Differential
object marking and language
contact. Special issue
of Journal of Language
Contact, 13(1), 17–56.
Bossong, G. (1982). Der
Präpositionale Akkusativ im
Sardischen. In O. Winkelmann & M. Braisch (Eds.), Festschrift
Johannes Hubschumid zum 65.
Geburstag (pp. 579–599). Francke.
(1991). Differential
object marking in Romance and
beyond. In D. Wanner & D. A. Kibbee (Eds.), New
analyses in Romance linguistics. Selected papers from the XVIII
Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Urbana-Champaign, April
7–9,
1988 (pp. 143–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(1998). Le
marquage différentiel de
l’object. In J. Feullet (Ed.), Actance
et valence dans les langues de
l’Europe (pp. 193–258). Mouton de Gruyter.
Cappellaro, C. (2016). Tonic
pronominal system:
Morphophonology. In A. Ledgeway & M. Maiden (Eds.), The
Oxford guide to the Romance
languages (pp. 722–740). Oxford University Press.
Cennamo, M., Ciconte, F. M., & Andriani, L. (this
volume). Syntactic and semantic constraints on differential object marking in Old Sardinian.
Dahl, Ö., & Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (2001). Kinship
in
grammar. In I. Baron, M. Herslund, & F. Sørensen (Eds.), Dimensions
of
possession (pp. 201–226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heusinger, K. von, & Chiriacescu, S. (2013). The
discourse structuring potential of differential object marking, the
case of indefinite and definite direct objects in
Romanian. Revue Roumaine de
Linguistique, 58, 439–456.
Iemmolo, G. (2010). Topicality
and differential object marking: Evidence from Romance and
beyond. Studies in
Language, 34(2), 239–272.
Jones, M. A. (1995). The
prepositional accusative in Sardinian: Its distribution and
syntactic
repercussions. In J. C. Smith & M. Maiden (Eds.), Linguistic
theory and the Romance
languages (pp. 37–75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kanazawa, Y. (2018). A
typological analysis of differential object marking in Old
Sardinian. In M. G. Martínez, M. C. Moral del Hoyo, & J. T. Williams Camus (Eds.), Aplicaciones
de la lingüística de corpus al estudio de lenguas
modernas (pp. 101–112). Real Sociedad Menéndez Pelayo.
López, L. (2016). (In)definiteness,
specificity, and differential object
marking. In S. Fischer & C. Gabriel (Eds.), Manual
of grammatical interfaces in
Romance (pp. 241–265). Walter de Gruyter.
Neuberger, K. A., & Stark, E. (2014). Differential
object marking in Corsican: Regularities and triggering
factors. Linguistics, 52(2), 365–389.
Putzu, I. (2005). Introduction. In I. Putzu (Ed.) Sprachtypologie
und
Universalienforschung, 58(2–3), 151–162.
(2008). Per
uno studio dell’accusativo preposizionale in sardo antico: Emergenze
dallo spoglio del Condaghe di San Pietro di
Silki. In R. Lazzeroni, E. Banfi, G. Bernini, M. Chini, & G. Marotta (Eds.), Diachronica
et synchronica. Studi in onore di Anna Giacalone
Ramat. (pp. 397–428). Edizioni ETS.
Rohlfs, G. (1972). Autour
de l’accusatif prepositionnel dans les langues
romanes. Revue de Linguistique
Romane, 35, 312–334.
