In:Differential Object Marking in Romance: Towards microvariation
Edited by Monica Alexandrina Irimia and Alexandru Mardale
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 280] 2023
► pp. 85–104
Clitic doubling in Brazilian Portuguese as a DOM strategy
Published online: 27 November 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.280.04bon
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.280.04bon
Abstract
This article shows that clitic doubling in Brazilian
Portuguese is possible if the direct and indirect objects correspond to a
first or a second person pronoun. We posit that the clitics are required
whenever the doubled object carries a familiar [topic] feature,
whose presence depends on the semantic properties of the nominal item. We
postulate that the clitics are merged in the head Do to value the
uninterpretable φ-feature of the head Do and the uninterpretable
topic feature of the object. This proposal entails that there is a transfer
of the topic feature from Ko to Do, which explains why
the clitic is spelled out on the head of DP. We claim that the phenomenon of
clitic doubling can be viewed as a side effect of differential object
marking. This mechanism contrasts with typical DOM in Romance
languages in the sense that it does not licence a preposition in a
prenominal position.
Keywords: clitic doubling, DOM, person feature, topic and case
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Empirical data: Clitic doubling of direct and indirect objects
- 2.1Summary of the section
- 3.Theoretical assumptions
- 4.The syntactic and semantic effects of clitic doubling
- 5.The syntactic derivation of clitic doubling in BP
- 5.1Derivation of the indirect object constructions
- 6.Final remarks
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (24)
Aboh, E. O. (2004). Topic
and focus within D. Linguistics in
the
Netherlands, 21, 1–12.
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential
object marking: Iconicity vs.
economy. Natural Language and
Linguistic
Theory, 21(3), 435–483.
Anagnostopoulou, E. (2006). Clitic
doubling. In M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The
Blackwell companion to
syntax (pp. 519–581). Blackwell.
Bernstein, J., Ordóñez, F., & Roca, F. (2018). DOM
and DP layers in Romance. Paper
presented at the international workshop
DOM in Romance – Towards
microvariation, Inalco,
Paris, November.
Butt, M., & King, T. H. (2004). The
status of
case. In V. Dayal & A. Mahajan (Eds), Clause
structure in South Asian
languages. Springer.
Carvalho, D. (2008). A
estrutura interna dos pronomes pessoais em
português (Tese (Doutorado em
Linguística). Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceió, AL.
Chomsky, N. (2008). On
phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero, & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational
issues in linguistic theory in honor of Jean-Roger
Vergnaud (pp. 133–166). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Croft, W. (1988). Agreement
vs. case marking and direct
objects. In M. Barlow & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Agreement
in natural language: Approaches, theories,
descriptions. The University of Chicago Press.
Delfitto, D. (2002). On
the semantics of pronominal clitics and some of its
consequences. Catalan Journal of
Linguistics, 1, 29–57.
Diniz, C. R. (2007). Eu
te amo você: O redobro de pronomes clíticos sob uma abordagem
minimalista (Dissertação de
Mestrado). UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Fale.
Dobrovie-Sorin, C. (1987). Syntaxe du Roumain: Chaines Thématiques. Thêse de Doctorat d’État. Université de Paris 7.
Giusti, G. (2006). Parallels
in clausal and nominal
pheriphery. In M. Frascarelli (Ed.), Phases
of interpretation: Studies in generative
grammar (pp. 163–186). De Gruyter Mouton.
Giusti, Giuliana. (2012). On
force and case, fin and
num. In V. Bianchi & C. Chesi (Eds.), Enjoy
linguistics! (pp. 205–217). Centro Interdipartimentali di Studi Cognitivi sul Linguaggio.
Haegeman, L. (2004). DP-periphery
and clausal periphery: Possessor doubling in West
Flemish. In D. Adger, C. De Cat, & G. Tsoulas (Eds.), Peripheries:
Syntactic edges and their
effects (pp. 211–240). Kluwer.
Hill, V., & Mardale, A. (2019). Patterns
for differential object marking in the history of
Romanian. Journal of Historical
Syntax, 3, 1–47.
Miyagawa, S. (2010). Why
Agree? Why Move? Unifying agreement-based and
discourse-configurational
languages. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Rocha, R. M. (2016). O redobro de clítico no português brasileiro
dialetal (Tese,
Doutorado em
Linguística). Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG.
Rocha, R. M., & Ramos, J. (2016). Clitic
doubling and pure agreement person
features. Revista de Estudos da
Linguagem, 24(2), 378–416.
Suñer, M. (1988). The
role of agreement in clitic-doubled
constructions. Natural Language and
Linguistic
Theory, 6, 391–434.
