Cover not available

In:Discourse Particles: Syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and historical aspects
Edited by Xabier Artiagoitia, Arantzazu Elordieta and Sergio Monforte
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 276] 2022
► pp. 1–10

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Introduction

Discourse particles: syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and historical aspects

 | University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
 | University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
 | University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
Published online: 17 May 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.276.int
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Issues under discussion in current research on discourse particles
  • 3.Contributions of this book
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (44)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1991. Discourse particles in German: How does their illocutive force come about. In Discourse particles: descriptive and theoretical investigations on the logical, syntactic, and pragmatic properties of discourse particles in German, Werner Abraham (ed), 203–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Modality in Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexander-Bakkerus, Astrid. 2011. Some Cholón discourse particles and Quechua homologues. In Lenguas indígenas de América: morfología y sintaxis, Andrés Romero-Figueroa (ed), 11–28. Caracas: Mercantil/ Universidad Católica Andrés Bello.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balusu, Rahul. 2019. Fine tuning the Dravidian left periphery: The three ‘complementizers’ in Telugu. In Proceedings of the workshop “Clause typing and the syntax-to-discourse relation in head-final languages”, Josef Bayer & Yvonne Viesel (eds), 13–38. Konstanz: Fachbereich Linguistik der Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 2012. From modal particle to interrogative marker: a study of German denn. In Functional Heads. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Laura Brugé (ed), 13–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef, Hinterhölzl, Roland & Trotzke, Andreas 2015. Discourse-oriented syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Struckmeier, Volker. 2017a. Discourse Particles: Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Volker Struckmeier. 2017b. The status quo of research on discourse particles in syntax and semantics. In Discourse Particles: Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 1–14. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhadra, Diti. 2017. Evidentiality and questions: Bangla at the interfaces. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
Biberauer, Theresa and Sheehan, Michelle. 2011. Introduction: particles through a modern syntactic lens. The Linguistic Review 28(4): 387–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boeder, Winfried. 2002. Speech and thought representation in the Kartvelian (South Caucasian) languages. In Tom Güldemann & Manfred von Roncador. (eds), 3–49, Reported discourse: A meeting ground for different linguistics domains. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2011. German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review 28(4): 493–531. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco. 2007. German modal particles in the IP-domain. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 32: 3–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Modal particles in Italian. Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 91–129.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corr, Alice. 2016. Ibero-Romance and the Syntax of the Utterance. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola. 2013. Discourse markers and modal particles: Categorization and description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Del Gobbo, Francesca, Munaro, Nicola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2015. On sentential particles: A crosslinguistic study. In Final particles, Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow & Margje Post (eds), 359–386. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Euskaltzaindia. 1987. Euskal gramatika. Lehen urratsak II. Bilbo: Euskaltzaindia.
Farkas, Donka. & Bruce, Kim. 2010. On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of Semantics 27: 81–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedmann, Naama, Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 2021. Growing trees: The acquisition of the left periphery. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics. 6(1: 131): 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick. 2006. German discourse particles are weak sentence adverbs. In Proceedings of the ‘XXXII Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Maria C. Picchi & Alan Pona (eds), 79–91. Florence: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Information structure and discourse particles. In The Oxford handbook of information structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 336–358. Oxford: Oxford University Press. < Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hack, Franziska M. 2014. The particle po in the varieties of Dolomitic Ladin – grammaticalisation from a temporal adverb into an interrogative marker. Studia Lingüística 68(1): 49–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2014. West flemish verb-based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layer. Studia Lingüística 68(1): 116–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie, Haselow, Alexander & Post, Margje. 2015. Final particles. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Johannes, Keupdjio, Hermann, Lam, Zoe W.M., Osa-Gómez, Adriana, Thoma, Sonja & Wiltschko, Martina. 2016. Intonation and particles as speech act modifiers: A syntactic analysis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 37(2): 109–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Munaro, Nicola. 2015. On the interpretation of modal particles in non-assertive speech acts in German and Bellunese. In Discourse-oriented syntax, Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds), 41–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Mitsuko N. Izutsu. 2013. From discourse markers to modal/final particles. In Discourse markers and modal particles: Categorization and description, Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie & Paola Pietrandrea (eds), 217–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim. 1991. On the semantics of modal particles. In Discourse particles: descriptive and theoretical investigations on the logical, syntactic, and pragmatic properties of discourse particles in German, Werner Abraham (ed), 141–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuong, Io-Kei J. 2008. Yes/no question particles revisited: The grammatical functions of mo4, me1, and maa3. In The 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-20), Marjorie Chang (ed), 715–733. Ohio: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuwabara, Kazuki. 2013. Peripheral effects in Japanese questions and the fine structure of CP. Lingua 126: 92–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lam, Zoe W. 2014. A complex ForceP for speaker-and addressee-oriented discourse particles in Cantonese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 35(2): 61–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Modicom, Pierre-Yves and Duplâtre, Olivier. 2020. Information-structural perspectives on discourse particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pankau, Andreas. 2018. The Syntax of ‘n in North East Berlin German. In the workshop Recent Issues in the Syntax of Questions. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz, 2018/10/8–10.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. 2014. Why particles are not particular: Sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica 68 (1): 77–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rijk, Rudolf P. G. de. 2008. Standard Basque: A progressive grammar. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scherf, Nathalie. 2017. The syntax of Swedish modal particles. In Discourse Particles: Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 78–99. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Struckmeier, Volker. 2014. Ja doch wohl C? Modal Particles in German as C-related elements. Studia Lingüística 68(1): 16–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tan, J. 2019. Evidentiality in Tagalog. PhD dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Thurmair, Maria. 1989. Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie & Leuschner, Torsten. 2015. Dutch (’t) schijnt and German scheint (') s: on the grammaticalization of evidential particles. Studia Lingüística 69(1): 86–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Eys, Willem J. 1879. Grammaire comparée des dialectes basques. Paris: Maisonneuve.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Kemenade, Ans & Links, Meta. 2020. Discourse particles in early English: Clause structure, pragmatics and discourse management. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5(1): 3. 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 2017. Ergative constellations in the structure of speech acts. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon (ed), 419–446. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue