In:Discourse Particles: Syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and historical aspects
Edited by Xabier Artiagoitia, Arantzazu Elordieta and Sergio Monforte
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 276] 2022
► pp. 229–254
Chapter 9Three German discourse particles as speech act modifiers
Published online: 17 May 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.276.09sch
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.276.09sch
Abstract
This work attempts to reduce the properties of three German discourse particles (DPs), ja,
nicht and etwa, to the basic building blocks of a formal discourse model (Farkas & Bruce 2010). We propose a definition of DPs as speech act
modifiers that restricts the space of allowed variation of their meanings, arguing against previous approaches in
terms of speaker attitudes. Speech acts modified by ja update the Common Ground
(CG) directly; previous characterizations of the epistemic status of the proposition arise as
descriptions of common justifications for such an imposed CG update. Etwa and
nicht turn open polar questions with two default resolutions into questions with only one
unmarked resolution; epistemic or bouletic attitudes arise as frequent connotations.
Keywords: German discourse particles, ja, nicht, etwa, Farkas, Bruce's discourse model
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The discourse model
- 3.Ja
- 4.Etwa & nicht
- 4.1Nicht
- 4.2Etwa
- 5.Conclusion
Notes References
References (24)
AnderBois, Scott. 2019. Negation,
alternatives, and negative polar questions in American
English. In Questions in Discourse – Volume 1:
Semantics [Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics
Interface 35], Klaus von Heusinger, Malte Zimmermann & Edgar Onea (eds), 118–171. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
AnderBois, Scott, Brasoveanu, Adrian & Henderson, Robert. 2015. At-issue
proposals and appositive impositions in discourse. Journal of
Semantics 32(1): 93–138.
Bayer, Josef & Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 2011. Discourse
particles, clause structure, and question types. The Linguistic
Review 28: 449–491.
Csipak, Eva & Zobel, Sarah. 2014. A
condition on the distribution of discourse particles across types of
questions. In Proceedings of
NELS 44(1), Jyoti Iyer & Leland Kusmer (eds), 83–94. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Döring, Sophia. 2016. Modal
Particles, Discourse Structure and Common Ground Management. PhD
dissertation, HU Berlin.
Egg, Markus & Mursell, Johannes. 2016. The
syntax and semantics of discourse
particles. In Discourse Particles: Formal Approaches
to their Syntax and Semantics [Linguistische
Arbeiten 564], Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier, 15–48. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
Farkas, Donka. 2007. The
grammar of polarity particles in
Romanian. Manuscript, <[URL]> (17 March
2021).
Farkas, Donka. & Bruce, Kim. 2010. On
reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of
Semantics 27: 81–118.
Gieselman, Simone & Caponigro, Ivano. 2013. Two
sides of the same pragmatic move: the German discourse particles etwa and
nicht. In Proceedings of
NELS 40(1), Seda Kan, Claire Moore-Cantwell & Robert Staubs (eds), 231–244. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Goodhue, Daniel. 2019. High
negation questions and epistemic bias. In Proceedings
of Sinn und Bedeutung 23(1), M. Teresa Espinal, Elena Castroviejo, Manuel Leonetti, Louise McNally & Cristina Real-Puigdollers (eds), 469–486. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Grosz, Patrick. 2014. German
doch: an element that triggers a contrast
presupposition. In Proceedings of the Forty-Sixth
Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic
Society 46(1), Rebekah Baglini, Timothy Grinsell, Jon Keane, Adam Roth Singerman & Julia Thomas (eds), 163–177. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Gunlogson, Christine. 2008. A
question of commitment. Belgian Journal of
Linguistics 22(1): 101–136.
Gutzmann, Daniel. 2016. Modal
particles ≠ modal particles (= modal
particles). In Discourse Particles: Formal Approaches
to their Syntax and Semantics [Linguistische
Arbeiten 564], Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier, 144–172. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
Jacobs, Joachim. 1991. On
the semantics of modal particles. In Discourse
Particles: Descriptive and theoretical investigations on the logical, syntactic and pragmatic properties of
discourse particles in German [Pragmatics & Beyond New
Series 12], Werner Abraham (ed), 141–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kaufmann, Magdalena & Kaufmann, Stefan. 2012. Epistemic
particles and performativity. In Proceedings of
SALT 22, Anca Chereches (ed), 208–225. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1999. Beyond
ouch and oops: how descriptive and expressive meanings interact. Handout for a
talk at the Cornell Conference on theories of context dependency, Cornell University: Ithaca, NY.
Kratzer, Angelika & Matthewson, Lisa. 2009. Anatomy
of two discourse particles. Handout for a talk at SULA
5, Harvard.
Ladd, Robert. 1981. A
first look at the semantics and pragmatics of negative questions and tag
questions. In Papers from the Seventeenth Regional
Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic
Society 17(1), Robert A. Hendrick, Carrie S. Masek & Mary Frances Miller (eds), 164–171. Chicago Linguistic Society.
Lindner, Katrin. 1991. ‘Wir
sind ja doch alte Bekannte’ The use of German ja and doch as modal
particles. In Discourse Particles: Descriptive and
theoretical investigations on the logical, syntactic and pragmatic properties of discourse particles in
German [Pragmatics & Beyond New
Series 12], Werner Abraham (ed), 163–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Romero, Maribel & Han, Chung-Hye. 2004. On
negative yes/no questions. Linguistics and
Philosophy 27: 609–658.
Rudin, Deniz. 2020. Intonational
Commitments. Manuscript, USC, <[URL]> (17
March 2021).
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
