In:Discourse Particles: Syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and historical aspects
Edited by Xabier Artiagoitia, Arantzazu Elordieta and Sergio Monforte
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 276] 2022
► pp. 13–40
Chapter 1On the adverbial origin of German modal particles
Published online: 17 May 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.276.01con
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.276.01con
Abstract
All German modal particles share important common properties. However, in a diachronic perspective, their
origin has often been explained by assuming that they have grammaticalized from different types of lexemes belonging
to several word classes: adjectives, adverbs, conjunctions, etc. The present paper intends to dissipate some erroneous
assumptions about the grammaticalization paths of modal particles and to offer a novel syntactic approach that
explains their origin and development. By following and elaborating on some recent ideas, I will explore the
hypothesis that modal particles have an adverbial origin and will provide corresponding evidence. In the syntactic
analysis, I will claim that all modal particles originate from specific types of (strong) lower adverb(ial)s that
become weak sentential adverbs under reanalysis.
Keywords: adverbial, grammaticalization, modal particle, sentence adverb
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Definition and general properties of modal particles
- 3.Origin and grammaticalization of German modal particles
- 3.1Donor lexemes – a short state of the art
- 3.2Donor lexemes – hypotheses
- 4.Which donor lexemes? Some empirical facts
- 4.1“Real” adverbs
- Einfach
- 4.2Predicatives
- Ruhig
- 4.3Sentence adverbs
- Eigentlich
- Vielleicht
- 4.4Temporal adverbs
- Denn
- 4.5Conjunctions
- Aber
- Doch
- 4.6Degree particles
- Nur
- Bloß
- 4.7Interim conclusions
- 4.1“Real” adverbs
- 5.Syntactic analysis of the grammaticalization of modal particles
- 6.Conclusions
Acknowledgments Notes References Appendix
References (57)
Abraham, Werner. 1991a. The
grammaticization of the German modal
particles. In Approaches to
Grammaticalization vol. 2 [Typological
Studies in Linguistics 19:2], Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 331–380. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1991b. Discourse
particles in German: How does their illocutive force come
about?. In Discourse
Particles, Werner Abraham (ed), 203–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Autenrieth, Tanja. 2002. Heterosemie
und Grammatikalisierung bei Modalpartikeln: Eine synchrone und diachrone Studie anhand von »eben«, »halt«,
»e(cher)t«, »einfach«, »schlicht« und »glatt« [Linguistische
Arbeiten 450]. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Axel, Katrin. 2007. Studies
on Old High German syntax. Left sentence periphery, verb placement and
verb-second [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics
Today 112]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Axel-Tober, Katrin & Müller, Kalle. 2017. Evidential
adverbs in German. Diachronic development and present-day meaning. Journal of
Historical
Linguistics 7(1–2): 9–47.
Bayer, Josef. 2012. From
modal particle to interrogative marker: a study of German
denn. In Functional
heads [The cartography of syntactic
structures 7], Laura Brugè et al.. (eds), 13–28. Oxford: OUP.
Burkhardt, Armin. 1994. Abtönungspartikeln
im Deutschen. Bedeutung und Genese. Zeitschrift für germanistische
Linguistik 22: 129–151.
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2007. Für
eine syntaktische Analyse von
Modalpartikeln. In Gesprochene Sprache –
Partikeln, Eva-Maria Thüne & Franca Ortu (eds), 89–101. Frankfurt: Lang.
. 2011. German
and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic
Review 28(4): 493–531.
. 2015. Italian
verb-based discourse particles in a comparative
perspective. In Discourse-oriented
Syntax, Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds), 71–91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michal. 1999. The
typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of
pronouns. In Clitics in the Languages of
Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed), 145–233. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs
and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Oxford Studies in Comparative
Syntax]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2001. ‘Restructuring’
and the order of aspectual and root modal
heads. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays
Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 137–155. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
. 2006. Restructuring
and Functional Heads. The Cartography of Syntactic
Structures, Volume 4 [Oxford
Studies in Comparative
Syntax]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cognola, Federica & Cruschina, Silvio. 2020. From
time to discourse: a syntactic analysis of Italian
poi. Handout for Seminari di Linguistica Ca’ Foscari –
VeReWebLing, 17th November 2020.
Coniglio, Marco. 2005. Deutsche
Modalpartikeln: eine syntaktische
Analyse. Diplomarbeit, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia.
. 2011. Die
Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln: ihre Distribution und Lizenzierung in Haupt- und
Nebensätzen. Berlin: Akademie.
. 2014. The
fine structure of Force. On the interaction of modal particles with illocutionary force and clause
type. In On Peripheries. Exploring Clause Initial and
Clause Final Positions [Hituzi Linguistics in
English 23], Anna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque & Yoshio Endo (eds), 103–140. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Coniglio, Marco & Zegrean, Iulia. 2012. Splitting
up Force. Evidence from discourse particles. In Main
Clause Phenomena. New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics
Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 229–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Diewald, Gabriele. 1997. Grammatikalisierung.
Eine Einführung in Sein und Werden grammatischer Formen [Germanistische
Arbeitshefte 36]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
. 1999. Die
dialogische Bedeutungskomponente von
Modalpartikeln. In Dialogue Analysis and the Mass
Media. Proceedings of the International Conference, Erlangen, April 2–3,
1998 [Beiträge zur
Dialogforschung 20], Bernd Naumann (ed), 187–199. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
. 2011. Pragmaticalization
(defined) as grammaticalization of discourse
functions. Linguistics 49(2): 365–390.
Diewald, Gabriele & Ferraresi, Gisella. 2008. Semantic,
syntactic and constructional restrictions in the diachronic rise of modal particles in German: A corpus-based
study on the formation of a grammaticalization
channel. In Theoretical and Empirical Issues in
Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in
Language 77], Elena Seoane & María José López-Couso (eds), 77–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dohi, Atsushi. 2020. CP-internal
Discourse Particles and the Split ForceP
Hypothesis. Lingua 233: 102757. < >.
Ebert, Robert P., Reichmann, Oskar, Solms Hans-Joachim and Wegera, Klaus-Peter 1993. Frühneuhochdeutsche
Grammatik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Ferraresi, Gisella. 2005. Word
order and phrase structure in Gothic. A comparative
study. Leuven: Peeters.
. 2014. Grammatikalisierung [Kurze
Einführung in die Germanistische
Linguistik 15]. Heidelberg: Winter.
Frey, Werner. 2004. The
grammar-pragmatics interface and the German prefield. Sprache und
Pragmatik 52: 1–39.
Grosz, Patrick. 2005. “Dn”
in Viennese German. The Syntax of a Clitic Version of the Discourse Particle
“denn”. MA thesis, Universität Wien.
Gutzmann, Daniel. 2008. On
the Interaction between Modal Particles and Sentence Mood in
German. Magisterarb. Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
Haegeman, Liliane & Hill, Virginia. 2013. The
syntactization of discourse. In Syntax and its
limits [Oxford Studies in Theoretical
Linguistics 48], Raffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali & Robert Truswell (eds), 370–390. Oxford: OUP.
. 2014. Vocatives
and speech act projections: a case study in West
Flemish. In On peripheries: Exploring Clause Initial
and Clause Final Positions, Anna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque & Yoshio Endo (eds), 209–236. Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.
Hentschel, Elke. 1986. Funktion
und Geschichte deutscher Partikeln:‘Ja‘,‘doch‘,‘halt‘ und
‘eben‘. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Jacobs, Joachim. 1986. Abtönungsmittel
als Illokutionstypmodifikatoren. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen
Linguistik 27: 100–111.
Kluge, Friedrich. 2011. Etymologisches
Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 25.
Auflage. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. Thoughts
on grammaticalization. 2nd revised
edition [ASSidUE 9]. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.
Meibauer, Jörg. 1994. Modaler
Kontrast und konzeptuelle Verschiebung: Studien zur Syntax und Semantik deutscher
Modalpartikeln [Linguistische
Arbeiten 314]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Molnár, Anna. 2002. Die
Grammatikalisierung deutscher Modalpartikeln.
Fallstudien [Metalinguistica 12]. Frankfurt: Lang.
Müller, Kalle. 2019. Satzadverbien,
Evidentialität und Non-At-issueness. PhD
dissertation, Eberhard Karls Universität
Tübingen.
Müller, Sonja. 2018. Distribution
und Interpretation von
Modalpartikel-Kombinationen. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Ormelius-Sandblom, Elisabet. 1997a. The
modal particle schon: Its syntax, semantics and
pragmatics. In Modality in Germanic Languages.
Historical and Comparative Perspectives [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and
Monographs 99], Toril Swan & Olaf J. Westwik (eds), 75–131. Berlin: de Gruyter.
. 1997b. Die
Modalpartikeln “ja“, “doch” und “schon”. Zu ihrer Syntax, Semantik und
Pragmatik. Lund: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Petrova, Svetlana. 2017. Left-Peripheral
Modal Particles in Older Germanic? In Syntax and
Semantics of Modal Particles, Volker Struckmeier & Josef Bayer (eds), 304–331. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Remberger, Eva-Maria. 2020. Discourse
and Pragmatic Markers in the Romance
Languages. In The Oxford Encyclopedia of Romance
Linguistics, Michele Loporcaro & Francesco Gardani (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Advance online publication. [[URL]].
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna. 2003. Syntactic
change. A minimalist approach to grammaticalization [Cambridge Studies in
Linguistics 100]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schifano, Norma & Cognola, Federica. 2020. From
macro to nano: A parametric hierarchy approach to the diatopic and diachronic variation of Italian
ben. In Syntactic architecture
and its consequences I: Syntax inside the grammar [Open Generative
Syntax 9], András Bárány, Theresa Biberauer, Jamie Douglas & Sten Vikner (eds), 233–250. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Thurmair, Maria. 1989. Modalpartikeln
und ihre Kombinationen [Linguistische
Arbeiten 223]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
. 1993. Äußerungsform
oder Äußerungsfunktion? Zu den Bedingungen für das Auftreten von
Modalpartikeln. Deutsche
Sprache 21: 22–43.
van Gelderen, Elly. 2004. Grammaticalization
as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2011. The
Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language
Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Kemenade, Ans & Links, Meta. 2020. Discourse
particles in early English: Clause structure, pragmatics and discourse
management. Glossa: A Journal of General
Linguistics 5(1): 3.
Wegener, Heide. 2002. The
Evolution of the German Modal Particle “denn”. In New
Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in
Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 379–393. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Axel-Tober, Katrin, Marco Coniglio, Kalle Müller & Katharina Paul
2025. Grammaticalization of sentence adverbs and modal particles revisited. In Historical Linguistics 2022 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 369], ► pp. 232 ff.
Coniglio, Marco & Sergio Monforte
Paul, Katharina & Marco Coniglio
2025. Adjectival adverbs or adverbial adjectives?. In The Diachrony of Word Class Peripheries [Studies in Language Companion Series, 238], ► pp. 60 ff.
Schoonjans, Steven
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
