Cover not available

In:New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax: Studies in honor of Yen-Hui Audrey Li
Edited by Andrew Simpson
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 272] 2022
► pp. 431–444

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

On the syntax of mirativity

Evidence from Mandarin Chinese

 | National Tsing Hua University
 | National Chung Hsing University
Published online: 13 April 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.272.15tsa
Abstract
This chapter proposes a unified analysis of Mandarin miratives in terms of their syntax and pragmatics. We examine the rather curious behavior of sentential adverbs such as yuanlai ‘turn out’ and zenme ‘how come’ in conjunction with the sentence final particle a. Specifically, the construals in question encode unexpectedness from the viewpoint of the speaker, as observed in other languages with overt morphology. It is argued extensively that the mirativity involved is syntactically represented by a functional projection in the left periphery, i.e., Speech Act Phrase. The evidence is drawn from the sentence-initial position of yuanlai and zenme, as well as their distribution in relation to evaluative adverbs and their exclusion from certain embedded clauses. Furthermore, the compatibility between Mandarin mirative expressions and indicative/interrogative mood presents a strong case for the separation of Force and Mood in cartographic terms.
Article outline
  • 1.Setting the stage
  • 2.Mirativity as a distinctive category
  • 3.The syntax of speech act and mirativity
  • 4.Further issues
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (34)
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2004. Evidentiality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology, 16(3), 435–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. The grammar of knowledge: a cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic typology, 1, 51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan A. & Dan I. Slobin. 1986. A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In Chafe & Nichols (eds.) 1986, 159–167. DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1. 33–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1991. On the typology of wh-questions. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, L. L. S. 1997. On the typology of wh-questions. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Issues in adverbial syntax. Lingua 114(6): 683–710. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco & Iulia Zegrean. 2012. Splitting up force: Evidence from discourse particles. In Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds.) Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 229–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, S. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 369–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16: 529–564. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. 2014. West Flemish verb-based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layer. Studia Linguistica 68 (1): 116–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, Virginia 2007. Vocatives and the Pragmatics-syntax Interface, Lingua 117: 2077–2105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C. T. J., & Ochi, M. 2004. Syntax of the hell: Two types of dependencies. In Proceedings-nels 34 (1): 279–294.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Boya. 2006. Chinese sentence-final particles and the syntax of the periphery. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lü, Shu-Xiang et al.. 1980. Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [Eight Hundred Words in Modern Chinese], Peking: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, Victor Junnan. 2015. Mandarin Peripheral Construals at the Syntax-Discourse Interface. The Linguistic Review 32.4:819–868. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. 2014. Why particles are not particular: sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica 68:77–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. New perspectives on Chinese syntax. De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peterson, Tyler. 2016. Mirativity as Surprise: Evidentiality, Information, and Deixis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45(6): 1327–1357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2009. Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. On Some Properties of Criterial Freezing. In The Complementizer Phase: Subjects and Operators, E. Phoevos Panagiotidis (ed.), Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Cartography and further explanation: The role of interface Principles, and Locality. Paper presented at Journées suisses de linguistique 9.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, P., & Tenny, C. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. Asymmetry in grammar 1: 315–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, Weiqun. 2006. Fuci ‘yuanlai’ de duo jiaodu kaocha [Examination of adverbial yuanlai from multiple perspectives]. Changjiang xueshu [Yangtze River Academic] 4: 117–123.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2008. Left periphery and how-why alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17(2): 83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. On the topography of Chinese modals. In Beyond functional sequence, Ur Shlonsky (ed.), 275–294. Oxford. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Y. F., Goodman, D., Chen, S. Y., & Hsiao, Y. H. 2011. Making claims and counterclaims through factuality: The uses of Mandarin Chinese qishi (‘actually’) and shishishang (‘in fact’) in institutional settings. Discourse Studies 13(2): 235–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watters, David E. 2002. A grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, Jiun-Shiung. 2012 “One-way Contrast vs. Two-way Contrast: On the Semantics of běnlái and yuánlái in Mandarin Chinese.” Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 41(2): 163–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, R.R.-J. 2004. Stance in Talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xing, Fuyi. 1985. Cong yuanlai de cixing kan cide guilei wenti [On the issue of syntactic categorization from the syntactic category of yuanlai]. Hanyu xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 6: 1–4.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Yang, Zhaole
2025. Three yěs in Mandarin. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
2024. On Projecting Causality. Nordlyd 48:1 ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
2025. A guide to construct non-canonical wh-questions. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 51:2 ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Wenjiang Yang
2024. From temporal adverbials to discourse markers: The development of Chinese yuánláiand its Japanese cognate ganrai. Russian Journal of Linguistics 28:4 ► pp. 771 ff. DOI logo
Łukasz Jędrzejowski & Carla Umbach
2023. Non-Interrogative Subordinate Wh-Clauses, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue