Cover not available

In:New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax: Studies in honor of Yen-Hui Audrey Li
Edited by Andrew Simpson
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 272] 2022
► pp. 165–192

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Modal movement licensed by focus

 | Yale University
 | University of Southern California
Published online: 13 April 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.272.06yip
Abstract
This paper investigates the high position of root modals (such as keyi ‘may’) in Chinese, and its interaction with focus interpretations. We address a long-standing puzzle concerning their position: A-not-A questions appear to exceptionally license an otherwise unavailable high position of root modals preceding subjects and/or topics. Upon closer examination, we observe that (i) A-not-A questions do not always license the high position of root modals and that (ii) the position of focus plays a crucial role in licensing high modals. We propose that root modals undergo head movement across a focused element to the high position, and this movement is constrained by a focus version of output economy.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.High root modals and focus
    • 2.1Focus interpretations
    • 2.2A-not-A questions and polarity questions
  • 3.Previous approaches to high root modals
    • 3.1Base generation approaches
    • 3.2The interpretation of high root modals
  • 4.A movement approach
    • 4.1Modal movement and the calculation of the focus set
    • 4.2A-not-A questions and focus reading
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
References (57)
References
Beck, Sigrid. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14 (1): 1–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh. 1998. Ability modals and their actuality entailments. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 17, 74–87.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brennan, Virginia Mary. 1993. Root and Epistemic Modal Auxiliary Verbs. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Luis Vicente. 2013. Verb doubling in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 22 (1): 1–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai Shen. 2008. Deconstructing the shì … de construction. The Linguistic Review 25: 235–66. . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–156. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Linguistics, Michael Kenstowicz (ed), 1–52. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dong, Hongyuan. 2009. Issues in the Semantics of Mandarin Questions. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka. 2015. In defense of closeness: focus-sensitive adverb placement. Ms., McGill University. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Wh-quantification in Alternative Semantics. Paper presented at GLOW in Asia XII and SICOGG XXII.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Mandarin shì clefts and the syntax of discourse congruence. Ms., National University of Singapore. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feldman, Harry. 1986. Doing the Best We Can: An Essay in Informal Deontic Logic. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Danny. 2000. Economy and Semantic Interpretation. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine. 2006. Aspects of Modality. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Homer, Vincent. 2015. Neg-raising and positive polarity: the view from modals. Semantics and Pragmatics 8 (4): 1–88. . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsu, Yu-yin. 2016. Sentence-initial modals as focus operators at CP in Chinese. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS), Ksenia Ershova, Joshua Falk & Jeffrey Geiger (eds), 257–68. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Move wh in a language without wh movement. The Linguistic Review 1: 369–416. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, Audrey Yen-hui Li & Yafei Li. 2009. The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine & Hedde Zeijlstra. 2013. Negation, polarity, and deontic modals. Linguistic Inquiry 44 (4): 529–568. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotek, Hadas. 2016. On the semantics of wh-questions. In Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung 20, Nadine Bade, Polina Berezovskaya & Anthea Schöller (eds), 424–447.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Composing Questions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1977. What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(3): 337–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Modality. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 639–650. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lechner, Winfried. 2007. Interpretive effects of head movement. Ms., University of Athens. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Tommy Tsz-Ming. 2019. Quantifier-raising a head. In Universal Grammar and Its Cross-linguistic Instantiations (Proceedings of GLOW in Asia XII & SICOGG XXI), Sae-Youn Cho (ed), 160–172. Seoul: The Korean Generative Grammar Circle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. Asymmetries in doubling and Cyclic Linearization. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 30: 109–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Audrey Yen-hui. 1990. Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1989. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, Jo-Wang & Chih-Chen Jane Tang. 1995. Modals as verbs in Chinese: a GB perspective. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 66: 53–105.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah. 2011. Finiteness of clauses and raising of arguments in Mandarin Chinese.” Syntax 14 (1): 48–73. . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics 48 (1): 151–186. . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matushansky, Ora. 2006. Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 37 (1): 69–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2006. On the “undoing’’ property of scrambling: a response to Bošković. Linguistic Inquiry 37 (4): 607–624. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Optionality.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed), 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1990. Modality and the English Modals. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paris, Marie Claude. 1979. Some aspects of the syntax and semantics of the ‘lian…. ye/dou’ construction in Mandarin. Cahiers de Linguistique d’Asie Orientale 5: 47–70. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2009. Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1995. Interface Strategies. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics. Utrecht: Utrecht University, Research Institute for Language and Speech.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2015. Notes on labeling and subject positions. In Structures, Strategies and beyond: Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti, Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann & Simona Matteini (eds), 17–46. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige. 1996. Information structure in discourse: towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. OSU Working Papars in Linguistics 49: 91–136.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Information structure in discourse: towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics 5 (6): 1–69. . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rochemont, Michael. 1986. Focus in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with Focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1 (1): 117–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, John. 1969. Auxiliaries as main verbs. In Studies in Philosophical Linguistics, Series One, William Todd (ed), 77–102. Evanston, Illinois: Great Expectations Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schaffar, Wolfram & Lansun Chen. 2001. Yes-no questions in Mandarin and the theory of focus. Linguistics 39 (5): 837–870. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur & Luigi Rizzi. 2018. Criterial freezing in small clauses and the cartography of copular constructions. In Freezing: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Domains, Jutta Hartmann, Marion Jäger, Andreas Kehl, Andreas Konietzko & Susanne Winkler (eds), 29–65. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shyu, Shu-ying. 1995. The Syntax of Focus and Topic in Mandarin Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
Teng, Shou-hsin. 1979. Remarks on cleft sentences in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 7 (1): 101–114.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, Cheng-yu Edwin. 2015. Toward a Theory of Mandarin Quantification. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2015. On the topography of Chinese modals. In Beyond Functional Sequence, Ur Shlonsky (ed), 275–294. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan & Ching-yu Helen Yang. 2015. Inner vs. outer A-not-A questions. Paper presented on International Workshop on Cartography of Syntax, Beijing Language and Culture University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan, Ching-Yu Helen Yang & Seng-hian Lau. 2017. Modal licensing and subject specificity in Mandarin and Taiwan Southern Min: a cartographic analysis. In Studies on Syntactic Cartography, Fuzhen Si (ed), 75–104. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi. 1999. Modal verbs must be raising verbs. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 18, 599–612.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Yip, Ka-Fai
2025. A unified biclausal approach to right dislocation in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 34:4 ► pp. 631 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Sze-Wing
2022. On the syntax of rhetorical questions: evidence from Cantonese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 31:3 ► pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. The Unity of Movement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 283], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue